Anonymous #2 22h

Two wings of the same authoritarian bird

3

Anonymous #2 21h

I find it funny how Rightists pretend to fight censorship, no respect for rule of law (felony tax fraud banned from doing business in NY), criminalizing dissent (putting reporters in prison), consolidating power (by gerrymandering and filling supreme court in order to overturn ancient cases), use of violence (idk sending in natl guard, use of ICE who pledged to the pres, not the consitition.) ALL while worshipping the man who does it right in front of them. Great job you've just described DJT

8

Anonymous #4 21h

What reporter was put in jail for what they reported on?

0

Anonymous #1 20h

Nah he’s based

1

Anonymous #2 20h

Fascism is by definition a right-wing movement, authoritarianism can exist on both sides of the political spectrum Watching stupid, propagandized rightoids with no understanding of basic political theory try to own online liberals and leftists is physically painful

0

Anonymous #2 20h

Don Lemon and Georgia Fort

1

Anonymous #5 20h

Fascism is not by definition a right wing movement lol

4

Anonymous #4 20h

I find it funny how Leftoids pretend to fight censorship while calling for censorship of political opponents, pretend to respect rule of law while calling for light sentences on murderers and rapists, consolidate power by whitewashing and gentrification, use violence by sending in ATF or IRS, all while worshipping the guy in front of them. Thanks Mamdani

5

Anonymous #3 20h

When your political opponents are actively trying to commit genocide against trans people and are violently targeting non-white immigrants to enforce a white supremacist agenda, censorship doesn’t sound so ridiculous does it? “Liberal judges” giving “light sentences” is merely a propaganda point that misrepresents how the criminal justice system works, light sentences are usually due to a weak prosecutorial effort or lack of evidence rather than legitimate leniency

1

Anonymous #5 20h

Tu quoque fallacy

0

Anonymous #3 20h

Whitewashing and gentrification are left-wing, how? I may ask? The ATF and IRS are left-wing, how? I may ask? Leftists don’t universally worship Mamdani. Just ask a tankie what they think about mamdani lmfao

1

Anonymous #5 20h

1) Gentrified areas tend to vote left 2) ATF is anti gun, IRS is pro tax 3) They almost universally dislike him for being too moderate which isn't any better than liking him imo

0

Anonymous #3 20h

Brother, do you not see the difference in censoring hate speech and censoring the people saying the hate speech isn’t okay? Censoring people supporting armed masked men kidnapping grandmas for being illegal versus censoring the people saying maybe it’s gone too far? Censoring the people saying trans people are dangerous or ungodly instead of censoring trans people? To apply censorship standards equally to everyone only benefits those in power to be able to marginalize those with less power

1

Anonymous #5 20h

No I don't see any difference in censoring political speech besides the ones judging what you can or can't say

0

Anonymous #3 20h

1) Gentrification is generally opposed by large portions of the left who actually see it as displacing marginalized and underprivileged communities 2) The left is not universally “anti-gun” Lmfao 3) The right is not universally “anti-tax” if you wanna characterize the left as “pro-tax” 4) Neither of those classifications have anything to do with left and right really at all 5) I’d say it’s mixed

1

Anonymous #5 20h

I'm sure the left would support masked men kidnapping grandmas too if it was under Biden and the ATF doing it instead of Trump and ICE

0

Anonymous #3 20h

I just think labeling shit like, “Immigrants are poisoning the blood of our country” (something Trump actually said) as “political speech” and not something to be condemned is just telling on yourself lmfao "All great cultures of the past perished only because the originally creative race died out from blood poisoning." - Adolf Hitler 💀

1

Anonymous #3 20h

Lol, why would the ATF kidnap grandmas? Unless they had illegal firearms, explosives, or were arsonists? 💀

1

Anonymous #5 20h

I just think labeling it as apolitical speech because you believe it's immoral is moronic.

0

Anonymous #5 20h

Immoral and political are certainly not mutually exclusive labels

0

Anonymous #3 20h

If you don’t see Hitler-esque speech as immoral, I would say you’re naive and simply allowing history to repeat itself.

1

Anonymous #5 20h

I didn't say that I don't think its immoral

0

Anonymous #3 20h

But sitting back and allowing that rhetoric to happen isn’t immoral?

1

Anonymous #5 19h

If it were I would have a lot more people to shut up than just the Nazis

0

Anonymous #3 19h

Yeah, that’s where we disagree then, I don’t think allowing fascist-adjacent speech by our leaders and sitting back is a moral thing to do. I think resisting is categorically the only moral thing to do. But, we can agree to disagree on that.

1

Anonymous #5 19h

If it were up to me just know you commie fucks would be sittin in the camps with them

0

Anonymous #3 19h

Who said I’m a communist lmfao

1

Anonymous #5 19h

Nobody its intended as an insult

0

Anonymous #3 19h

lol, did I strike a nerve somehow?

1

Anonymous #5 19h

I generally dislike when people want to oppress others, it's nothing about you

0

Anonymous #3 19h

So, you must dislike Trump wanting to oppress immigrants, trans people, homeless people, Hispanic people in general, poor people, etc.?

0

Anonymous #5 19h

LMAO

5

Anonymous #5 19h

Almost as much as I dislike the idea of losing the 1st or 2nd amendments

0

Anonymous #3 19h

Why would censoring hate speech or preventing people that are a danger to themselves or others from having firearms be so awful to you?

1

Anonymous #2 19h

Literally is, ask any political science scholar

1

Anonymous #2 12h

Don Lemon is the only recognizable name but there's been others and he's tried to strip press passes from democratic news outlets

1