Anonymous blue__wave 2w

No lol. And he was illegally carrying his firearm let’s don’t forget that

-3

Anonymous #1 2w

You’re comparing apples to oranges brother

-3

Anonymous OP 2w

Pls explain

1

Anonymous OP 2w

How was he what are you sourcing?

11

Anonymous blue__wave 2w

He didn’t have his ID on him. In Minnesota you must have your ID while conceal carrying otherwise it’s breaking the law

-2

Anonymous OP 2w

Even if that was true breaking the law doesn’t mean you get executed on the spot lol. Is that supposed to also be the proof that he was planning to illegally kill people?

11

Anonymous #1 2w

One was impeding a law enforcement operation and the other was protecting property during a violent riot/protest. Kyle did not interfere or target LEO. Two very different things.

-3

Anonymous blue__wave 2w

In situations like that our LEO have to make split second decisions which can result in a fatality. Don’t want to die then don’t interfere with an operation and most importantly don’t bring a gun.

-1

Anonymous blue__wave 2w

There were hundreds of Minnesotians that didn’t get shot that day, wanna know why? They were at home minding their damn business and not looking for trouble

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

Lmao I’m glad you moved away from that restarted point.

11

Anonymous blue__wave 2w

Huh?

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

That’s super cool they aren’t executing random people. That’ doesn’t have any relevance if that specific shooting was justified or not.

3

Anonymous OP 2w

Yeah and they made the wrong choice.

6

Anonymous OP 2w

I’m calling you a dipshit sorry I have to censor my self but I want you to know.

5

Anonymous blue__wave 2w

How am I a dipshit? Literally all that could’ve been avoided if he listed to his parents and stayed home. That’s what most people don’t understand. All these incidents with ICE would be completely avoided if they just chill out an stay home

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

It’s ok you’re confused I’ll explain to you why you’re a dispshit. Even if I agreed with you that he was acting inappropriately that doesn’t justify the ice agent. This would be like if I j walked and someone beat me with a hammer. Then you walked by and said “this could have been avoided if you didn’t j walk”.

7

Anonymous OP 2w

I don’t even have to disagree with you on the facts bc your logic is stupid. Even if everything you’re saying is true that wouldn’t justify it.

6

Anonymous #3 2w

The gun was on his persons. He didn’t have to brandish it but it literally takes less than a milla second for someone to draw and shoot. So he was physically capable of harming people. I didn’t say nobody with gun looking for peace however interfering a law enforcement operation with a gun isn’t peaceful

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

The gun was not on him you can watch footage of an agent taking the gun away. Unless it was a gun with the same coloring and scope that the agent was randomly taking away, and that he magically pulled out after digging in his belt.

10

Anonymous blue__wave 2w

This was before he was shot.

4

Anonymous blue__wave 2w

It don’t matter. He had it at one point. And he touched the ICE agents. Humans can process that level of movement and speed. So the delayed reaction is justified.

0

Anonymous OP 2w

Someone grabbed the gun from him what are you talking about?

4

Anonymous OP 2w

Someone not only grabbed the gun but took it away before he was murdered.

3

Anonymous OP 2w

Kyle was 17 and didn’t even have the legal right to cross states with a gun didn’t even have a fucking permit…

6

Anonymous blue__wave 2w

Yes but he still had the gun before they grabbed it from him. That’s when he was a threat and when the ice agents were ready to shoot. The gun was removed but that removal wasn’t mentally processed yet. If he didn’t have any guns at all none of this would occur

0

Anonymous blue__wave 2w

He shouldn’t have had the gun in the first place. Then nobody would’ve need to take it away from him or shoot him. It’s not that complicated brother

0

Anonymous OP 2w

This isn’t serious you literally just learned the gun wasn’t even on him. So if you have a gun on you then police start wrestling you and one takes it away from you that means they can shoot you ten times?

5

Anonymous blue__wave 2w

If the police wrestling you doesn’t know your gun was removed yet then yes. And it would not be the police fault it would be yours for starting shit with the police and escalating it by bringing a gun

0

Anonymous OP 2w

Ok we’re back to the dipshit argument. People have the right to carry guns in this country if they don’t have their id with them then you charge them to execute them. Again someone breaking the law doesn’t justify the police breaking the law.

2

Anonymous blue__wave 2w

If I have a gun on me and a charge towards cops and they shoot me who’s at fault? Me or the cops?

0

Anonymous blue__wave 2w

Not*

5

Anonymous OP 2w

He didn’t start shit he was recording them which is 100% legal.

4

Anonymous blue__wave 2w

But he still interfered which is illegal

0

Anonymous OP 2w

No charged towards the cops why are you making up random things lol?

6

Anonymous OP 2w

Shouldn’t the police communicate that they removed the gun so they don’t kill people who aren’t threats? Wouldn’t that be better than executing people?

6

Anonymous OP 2w

Recording isn’t interfering how did he interfere?

6

Anonymous blue__wave 2w

1. Unlawful Carrying of a Concealed Firearm Without a identification 2. Interference With or Obstruction of an Ongoing Law Enforcement Operation 3. Disorderly Conduct 4.Unlawful Recording of Law Enforcement Personnel While Failing to Maintain the Required Distance

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

the way none of this is true

4

Anonymous OP 2w

And by breaking all those laws he essentially is illegally possessing the firearm which is a felony

0

Anonymous OP 2w

Again none of that means that ice can execute you I don’t know how many times you’re gonna make the same points about nothing. How did he interfere you keep saying that?

7

Anonymous #5 2w

The way all of it is true. Anybody who interpret the law would agree

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

Recording isn’t unlawful you don’t have expectation of privacy in public areas.

5

Anonymous blue__wave 2w

Did you not watch the video? He got in the middle of ice, he touched one of the agents, then he proceeded to get in between ice and a suspect. There’s more too

0

Anonymous OP 2w

We get it baby. You want to suck their 🍆 after licking the boots clean from blood. Unfortunately, your desperate desire to defend them won't make any of that true.

1

Anonymous blue__wave 2w

Yes but you must record at a safe distance or somewhere that’s not imedpeding the law

0

Anonymous OP 2w

Omg he’s gonna list off more irrelevant or imaginary shit.

9

Anonymous blue__wave 2w

Can we just agree he should’ve listens to his parents and stayed home. Would have been better for everybody

0

Anonymous OP 2w

Ok shouldn’t the police communicate when they grab a gun instead of executing people. We’re gonna go question by question.

9

Anonymous blue__wave 2w

This isn’t a superhero movie bother it’s real life. Things move in nanoseconds. The gun was removed so quick. Far faster than people can process. Unless one of the ICE agents is the Barry Allen the flash I don’t see how you can try to pin millisecond changes on them

0

Anonymous OP 2w

I’ll maybe agree with that if you give any responsibility to the people who shot him. Law enforcement is supposed to have higher standards than random people on the street.

4

Anonymous OP 2w

“Just don’t speak out against the government bro and they won’t be forced to execute you bro. Those Iranian protesters could have just stayed home.”

5

Anonymous OP 2w

It wasn’t removed quickly the agent was able to wrestle it away from him and run away. That’s not nanoseconds. Again should agents communicate when they take someone’s gun?

6

Anonymous OP 2w

Actually didn’t even wrestle it away the guy didn’t even have hands on it.

2

Anonymous blue__wave 2w

If you don’t bring guns to law enforment operations which you have no business being at then agents won’t have to communicate when they take someone’s guns

-1

Anonymous OP 2w

Should they have communicated? stop talking about random shit. You have tik tok brain you’re talking about the flash I’m asking you a simple question, stop spazzing out.

6

Anonymous OP 2w

So you think that anyone with a gun on them should be executed immediately?

10

Anonymous OP 2w

Yeah don’t trust this guy around your drinks.. grade A victim blaming

9

Anonymous OP 2w

Oh so it’s okay to point guns at civilians but not have the holstered around Pigs? It’s okay for a civilian to put someone to death but not for someone to carry a gun as given in the second amendment? Mental gymnastics are Olympic level

11

Anonymous OP 2w

He did nothing but try to help a lady how got shoved to the ground, while getting pepper sprayed and beaten. He never tried to fight back. His last words were literally “are you okay?” You’re either a lying fucking scumbag, or a gullible moron.

10

Anonymous OP 2w

OP, do you live in a Clint Eastwood movie???

1