Sidechat logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
US Politics icon
US Politics 2w
“obey the law” “don’t protest armed forces” THEY WERE AND THEY HAVE THE FUCKING RIGHT TO. what the fuck is wrong with these people.
comment

17
upvote 19 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

You are right to a certain extent. People absolutely have the right to protest, but that right only extends so much. There is a difference between the Pretti and Good shootings. The Pretti one was absolutely awful and unjustified, as he did nothing wrong in that situation, and the ICE agent abused his power. The Good shooting was justified, since she used violence against the officers, and they shot in self defense. The right to protest is only for NONVIOLENT protest.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

They agree with ICE’s mission.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

Yep, this. Hopefully the courts will reflect this

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

but she wasn’t!!!!! she was driving away in fear for her life and the agent overreacted and shot her instead of getting his ass out of the way

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

none of these protests have been violent. the agents make them violent cause they want to cause problems. sure obstructing traffic is annoying, but they had no right to try and force her out of her car and shoot her when she wasn’t even armed.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

They had every right to shoot her when she was trying to hit an ICE agent with her car. Look at the bodycam footage from the agent. Makes it seem pretty evident that she was trying to hit the officer and not trying to escape.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

no she wasn’t bro open your eyes or get some glasses holy fuck

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

Looking at the video through a biased lens will do that to you. If you came upon the video not knowing what it was, I guarantee you would think that woman was trying to hit the officer with her car.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

it appears that way yes but it’s been proven that she wasn’t. talked about biased lens bffr

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

can you cite the proof if it’s been proven?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

also you told me to “open my eyes and get some glasses” and then proceeded to say that “it appears that way” that Good was trying to hit the officer. Stay consistent, my man.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

i have more important things to do than prove something to a stranger on the internet when they have the exact same resources as me.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

of course you’d assume i’m a man. typical

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

Clearly, you don’t, given that you responded in less than a minute lmaooo. You made a claim, now prove it. If not I’m just gonna have to regard it as false.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

It’s just a way to regard you. If I called you “dude” would you say I was assuming you’re a man? I call women “my man” or “my dude” all the time. Soft as Cottonelle fr

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

because you just so happened to conveniently respond while i was still in the app 🤡

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

yes, hence why i said “of course you’d assume i’m a man”

upvote 1 downvote