
Battle plans for going to war with Iran, along with 6 other Muslim countries we would go on to invade in the years to come were leaked to the public in 2001. You should read manufacturing consent to get an idea of how the propaganda system actually works, as well as the history of our country—otherwise you would have no need to ask this in the first place. But it’s good that you are, even if rhetorically, because it potentially hints at curiosity, which is necessary for us to understand things
Israel has been trying to get us to go to war with Iran since the 90s, this is in the public record rather humorously with Netanyahu’s speeches saying Iran is “weeks away from getting a nuke” since at least 1995, there’s a compilation you can see online. In fact we supported Saddam Hussein as a proxy with chemical weapons in the Iran-Iraq war in the 80s, so they’ve been considered an enemy for some time now. If you read the foreign policy work of Zbigniew Brzezinski this is made fairly evident
Legitimacy rests upon truth, the truth is a name of God in Islam. Islam is a description, meaning submission to God, and a means of guidance for humanity in embodying, actualizing, and having a relationship with the transcendent. It is the means of having truth itself, and its proper manifestation is truth. So what you’re really asking is: is it legitimate to criticize that which is legitimate? No. What there’s logical room for is having legitimate criticism of Muslims & our faulty actualization
That movie, which is propaganda, distorts its own alleged story upon which it is based to edit out the Muslim men & women who helped her leave the country. The goal is to dehumanize & vilify Muslim society but chiefly its men as abusive monsters that must be defeated, which underwrites a moral support for war in the public consciousness. Are there bad Muslim men? Of course. Are there good Muslim men? Obviously. This isn’t a new strategy at all, much the same was employed against Germans in WW1
The German hun is framed as a brutish monkey, to be defeated so white women can be “liberated.” Similar verbiage was used by Tucker Carlson to dehumanize Iraqis as illiterate monkeys in the lead up to the Iraq war, which resulted in many cases of rape committed by American soldiers, who will likely find themselves in the excruciatingly fiery gaping pits of hell once their sad lives end. Fundamentally: the media and imperial ecosystems in this country always work in concert with one another
How are you being subliminally influenced to view your fellow human beings who happened to be born on some other plot of land on the other side of the world? What do you actually know about them truly or what they believe truly? Does this give you the right to take their life, their children’s life, their cat’s life, their property, their dignity? All this has to be agreed to by first framing the other as unhuman, immoral, etc. There are terrible abusive alcoholic child molesting Christian
And Jewish and irreligious men in this country. There are also plenty of decent normal men though. What if someone decides to make that the primary framing of Americans as the ugliest of us? Highlighting the fact our government executes genocide while covering up for Epstein, a government we supposedly voted in. Does that give the world license to view us that way? Do we deserve death & worse for this sensationalized depiction of us? No. Any moral person can see such a depiction to be propaganda