Anonymous #1 8w

What are u even talking about like I cannot think of a single person that would agree with u on this

2

Anonymous #2 8w

Why would anyone want to have children with women who built a whole movement around making TikTok’s about killing their own kids…

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

Yeah ur an idiot go back to ur 4chan cave

0

Anonymous #2 8w

No.

0

Anonymous #1 8w

U don’t even make sense, I’m yet to see a woman defending the fact that Lindsay Clancy murdered those kids beyond incel comments claiming that they are. I see a lot of people claiming that she should be allowed to get off for on mental health reasons the same way that men are able to get away with things with that claim. I also don’t think it’s some crazy thing for people to push for further investigation in a case that is so public and has a lot of gaps to the story.

1

Anonymous #2 8w

You realize they had a whole trial about this and in the trial what was being argued wasn’t about if she did or did not kill her kids… But I’ll be curious before overtly judgmental and ask what the leading theory is as to who killed the kids if there is sincere belief she wasn’t the person who did it?

1

Anonymous #2 8w

I’ll even bridge the gap on the her google searches because anything digital is here-say and can/could be a deepfaked/hacked. What are the gaps?

1

Anonymous #1 8w

I mean obviously her lawyer is going to bring up any point he possibly can like that’s his job lol? Also the whole point here is that she just goes straight to life while men get to get off of prison sentences to go to mental facilities etc when they claim it so why can’t she do the same? If she goes to prison the men should too. Ur missing the point entirely bc of ur echo chambers

1

Anonymous #2 8w

If you’re referring to the Deccarius Brown Jr. stabbing (or similar murders), I’m not aware of anyone who thought putting that guy in a mental facility was the correct move. That judge must have been insane to take the insanity plea. Main

1

Anonymous #2 8w

2/2 Main* differences the judge might have accepted was there didn’t appear to be premeditation but again, that was also murder and he absolutely should have gotten the death penalty. There were laws like this in the 1970s (common law) dating back to ancient times. I say this often enough, when you let people off for rape and murder rather than issue the death penalty, go figure, they multiply, or at least the behavior does. There’s a good reason there was capital punishment for both.

1

Anonymous #1 8w

What demographics are you talking about?

1