Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Downvote and cry all you want about it, bury your head deeper in the sand, it doesn’t matter. Your time is ending and you know it. The day will come when your ideology is dispensed in the dustbin of history and all you’ll have left is your snide remarks and your oversized egos

0

Anonymous #1 1w

Cool you’re welcome to be a moron

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

It’s especially funny because liberals are the entire reason we are here. They literally created the conditions necessary for this to happen. Literally everything the left has stated would happen has come to pass, while the neoliberal project is in tatters, its vanguard being Matt Yglesisas and Richard Hanania, and yet they still think they’re winning. Comical

3

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

This guy has to be having a bad acid trip rn

0

Anonymous #1 1w

Look man if you wanna keep ur head in the sand that’s on you I really don’t give a fuck

0

Anonymous #1 1w

In fact I hope you do so when your order collapses it falls right on your neck

0

Anonymous #2 1w

This is you

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Index is invalid because you don’t like the outcome?

-1

Anonymous #2 1w

Made up number by western institute make China look bad. I must believe this because I love the west - you

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

“ Anything that speaks negatively about China is western propaganda, I get my information directly from China where there is no propaganda 😀 “

-1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Damn those excluded factors sure seem important for human development. Almost like they left them out intentionally

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

“ Ignores environmental sustainability” oh shit my bad dawg I forgot China was leading the world in that

-1

Anonymous #2 1w

Continue to base your opinions on outdated propaganda I suppose

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Head in the sand etc etc. I love when you idiots prove my point

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Yikes

-1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Shucks

-1

Anonymous #2 1w

Damn it’s almost like leading in environmental sustainability is about the investments you’re making in green technology and the rate of progress in transition and not net carbon emissions which are literally just a population metric

4

Anonymous #2 1w

Again, keep regurgitating your outdated propaganda. You’ve lost! It doesn’t matter! Your head in the sand only hurts you at this point

5

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

“Outdated propaganda” and it’s recent numbers? Come on man you’re better than regurgitating the same Reddit response

-1

Anonymous #2 1w

Aww poor little chud isn’t gonna reply to the main point of analysis I provided?? Why? Cause acknowledging it means you have to take your head out of the sand?

1

Anonymous #2 1w

What part of the “undisputed global leader in environmental sustainability” do you not understand? Do you think they didn’t take those numbers into account? Of course they did. They just have nothing to do with the measure of environmental sustainability!!!

3

Anonymous #2 1w

Also I love how you solely focused on the environment, and not the main point about how your dumb development index is just a measure of income without taking into consideration quality of life, which is by far the dumbest fucking measurement of a country every LMFAO

3

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

You’re saying that China is a global leader and environmental sustainability, I’m saying they lead the globe in pollution. Both are true

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Yea cause “net carbon emissions” are a population metric not a metric of anything that matters in terms of development you fucking idiot

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

That's crazy. So I would assume if it's just based on population, then India would have a similar pollution, right?

-1

Anonymous #2 1w

Damn it’s almost like a large population country that is more industrialized will have more carbon emissions than a similar sized country that is not industrialized. Do you morons solely operate on a first grade understanding of the world? How incapable of nuance are you? As bad as MAGA fr

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

You’re obviously uneducated about what the human development index even encapsulates and it’s pretty apparent because you think it’s just income

-1

Anonymous #2 1w

If you want a carbon emissions chart that actually matters, oh look who’s on top!

3

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

I just wanna make it clear that you’re conceding that it’s not solely a population metric

-1

Anonymous #2 1w

It used incomes as proxy to make its determinations on essentially all of its factors LMFAO

1

Anonymous #2 1w

I’m not conceding anything. It is p much exclusively a population metric with some room for nuance, something that you are incapable of

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Per capita metrics are great as long as you want to “ bury your head in the sand” when it comes to ecosystem damage and global climate impact. Both things that are driven by absolute totals and not averages

-1

Anonymous #2 1w

dawg you are so intellectually bankrupt LMAO. Talking in circles like a dumb dog chasing his tail

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Goodbye dipshit. Keep screaming into the sand like a moron

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

It also doesn’t use income as a proxy, further cementing that you’re uneducated

-1

Anonymous #2 1w

No actually it literally does you illiterate fuck

0

Anonymous #2 1w

It exclusively measures three factors: life expectancy, education, and income. It also cannot get accurate data on the first two a lot of the time so it uses Income as a proxy to determine them!

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

What you’re saying is factual incorrect, being so dead set on making that up is pretty sad

0

Anonymous #2 1w

No it literally isn’t. That’s the main critique of the HDI!!!

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Like bro LMAO. Are you always this dishonest?

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Where in that does it show income being used as a substitute for life expectancy or education?

0

Anonymous #2 1w

lol stay married to your fundamentally flawed burger America institute numbers

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Are you legitimately using Google’s AI summary? “Google does hdi use income as a proxy for the standard of living”

0

Anonymous #2 1w

I just figured you were incapable of reading the actual report that info comes from LMFAO

0

Anonymous #2 1w

You have no argument! Give up!

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

If HDI was truly using income as a proxy for health and education then that paper would be calling the index invalid instead of debating income scaling

0

Anonymous #2 1w

You rn

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Your entire argument is based on something you can’t prove, or at least past what google’s ai overview tells you. Show me a source that says HDI substitutes income for health and education

0

Anonymous #2 1w

I literally did. You can’t read. That’s ok🫶

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

The paper quite literally says otherwise

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Is it dishonesty or illiteracy? The world may never know

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Your rebuttal was just a meme you have nothing

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Dude I replied with a meme because that’s all you deserve. You keep talking in circles and proving nothing, focusing on minute details that aren’t even wrong and ignoring my broader argument. You are intellectually bankrupt and not worth my time

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

You think its flawed because you think it uses income to proxy health and education, it doesn’t You said net carbon emissions was a population metric when its not

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Uh huh except I’ve proven both and you just keep repeating yourself. Kept talking in circles like doggy

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

You argue just like maga, “ if I say this enough, it will be true”

0

Anonymous #2 1w

And using ai summaries

0

Anonymous #2 1w

LMAOOO ok boss whatever you say

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

You legitimately cant produce anything to substantiate your claim but you’re so confident

0

Anonymous #2 1w

I have. You just cant read and reject anything I produce that doesn’t align with your narrative

1

Anonymous #2 1w

Classic neoliberal dog. You want some headpats lil pup for being such a good bitch for capital?

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Brother your own paper doesn’t agree with you

0

Anonymous #2 1w

You obviously didn’t read anything past the abstract if you can read at all

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

“Classic neoliberal dog” 🤓

0

Anonymous #2 1w

And you continue to disregard any other critique I levied against the HDI because you have literally zero argument for it

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Aww who’s a good bitch?

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

My brother in christ you only sent the abstract, find in the paper where it agrees with you instead of copy pasting the first link after searching “does hdi use income as a proxy for health and education”

0

Anonymous #2 1w

You have google and can read LMAO

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

I don’t disagree because of your political affiliation, I think you’re stupid. Theres a big difference

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Not my job to do the intellectual heavy lifting for you just because you are incapable

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

The burden of proof is on YOU is this your first time or something?

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

“Yeah you’re wrong also look it up I cant prove how” like bro💀

0

Anonymous #2 1w

LMAO I already proved it brother. If you can’t read just say that!

0

Anonymous #2 1w

I literally put the report in your hands. It would take you 2 seconds to find it. You’re inability to do any intellectual work at all ever is not my fault :)

0

Anonymous #2 1w

But you’re being such a good doggy!! Maybe you’ll get some dog treats for being so obedient 😋😋

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

If it takes “2 seconds” to find it and the burden of proof is on you. Why can’t you find the proof? Why can’t you substantiate your claim

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Idk what’s up with you and the dog thing bro but I’m not here to engage in your weird kinks

0

Anonymous #2 1w

You keep acting like a dumb bitch so I figured I’d treat you like one

0

Anonymous #2 1w

I did. You’re too stupid and ideologically blinded to see it. You also CONTINUE to fail to address any of the other critiques of the HDI I’ve levied because you KNOW the HDI is bunk

1

Anonymous #2 1w

But anyways here’s your treats BITCH

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Textbook performative communist

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Eat up bitch. It’s the most you’re ever gonna get from your masters

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Also do you not have a life? You reply in two seconds no matter how long it’s been. Maybe get some pussy or do some homework or something LMFAO

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Brother you cant levy a single valid point, the best you could do was an ai summary

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Says the guy responding in seconds? Way to tell on yourself

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Proven now, you’re not intelligent

0

Anonymous #2 1w

I’ve made at least 3 valid and substantiated critiques of the HDI, only one of which you replied to, because you have no answer to the other two. Even if one falls, the other two prove you’re wrong :) I get that this kind of advanced, high school level thinking is hard for someone who’s just a dog

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Tf do you mean I’ve taken well over an hour to reply several times LMAO. And then after I’ve been gone for an an hour your still here twiddling your thumbs like a loser

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Oh no. You are calling me dumb cause dumb is in my username? What ever will I do! It can’t be that I put that there because my intelligence is so obviously proven and clear that it is the least of my insecurities. You ain’t even original with your jabs. BITCH

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Your other point being “made up numbers to make china look bad” and that net carbon emissions are a population metric (which later agreed it isnt) Keep up the larp lil bro

0

Anonymous #2 1w

If you were able to read above a kindergarten level you’d see that I also pointed out how it fails to take into consideration quality of life and rather uses gross income of a country as a raw metric which is horribly inaccurate

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

The ai overview said its true

0

Anonymous #2 1w

No. The academic report says it’s true. You know. The one you’re too stupid to read

0

Anonymous #2 1w

I get that you can do this all day, because you don’t have a life outside yikyak and gooning to anime girls, but I have things to do, people to see, women to sleep with, modeling shoots to shoot. Keep being a loser tho it suits you

-2

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

The academic report that you literally cant find where it proves your point? The one where you said “you have google look it up”?

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Again with the self report, you wanna goon to anime thats on you. Ive been getting paid this whole time, on the clock and reached my metrics. Get your game up lil bro

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Mhmm sure boss I just got cast for the editorial modeling team in a huge magazine so I really don’t give a fuck about you at all anymore. Keeping being a dipshit✌️

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

If HDI used gross national income then smaller countries couldn’t rank high, but they do so objectively not true

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Bro is flexing being a model that moonlights as a performative communist on yy, hell yeah man im proud of you

0

Anonymous #2 1w

LMAOO im hotter, smarter, more interesting, and a better person than you

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Goodbye loser I’m going to the stratosphere

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

So smart you cant find in the report where it proves your point btw

0

Anonymous #2 1w

You are so far beneath me at this point it’s hard to even register your chattering as human writing

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

You just cant stay away can you, back with the most reddit responses imaginable

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Omg I almost forgot about my court jester hiiiiii

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Like a moth to a flame

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Hiiiiii I’m high off an 1000mg edible and you make me laugh really hard

0

Anonymous #2 1w

It’s like watching a toddler crash their bike

1

Anonymous #2 1w

Do you do anything except sit on yikyak? I was gone like 6 hours and yet here you are when I ring my lil bell!!

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Holy fried dopamine receptors, lowkirkenuinely explains a lot

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

This guy hasn’t discovered notifications yet chat

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Oh don’t worry lil guy it’s not a common thing for me I’m celebrating! Didn’t you hear? I’m gonna be famous!

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

I like this comment thread, it reminds me that even when I feel dumb there’s still people out there who make me feel smart

0

Anonymous #2 1w

No that’s what I mean! I ring my lil bell and it sends you a notification and you come right to me! Nothing else to do but wait dutifully for the notification to entertain me :) my court jester!

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Dumbegg is becoming a chicken, hurrah

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Awww that’s cuteeee. I’m sure feeling (emphasis on feel) smart is all you have

1

Anonymous #2 1w

Mmmm try again that one wasn’t funny it was just stupid :( bad court jester

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Didn’t make any sense

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Just like dumbegg I like to keep the humor low iq. Easier to digest ya feel

0

Anonymous #2 1w

No no no it has to make sense that’s not how humor works at all. Bad court jester

1

Anonymous #2 1w

Don’t make me leave you all alone! Keep entertaining me properly or I’m gonna have to go away for awhile and then you’ll have nothing left ;(

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Chicken comes after egg, chicken hatches from egg, you just got your big BREAK, like an egg

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

I’m playing Balatro, im sorry egg but you’ll never come close to being as interesting as Balatro

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Bad👎🏻 keep it up and it’s to the dungeon with you

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

I cant dumb down this humor any more 🫩

0

Anonymous #2 1w

67 hahah get it 67

0

Anonymous #2 1w

See that’s a good one! I like that you are pretending that you have any choice but to reply to me whenever I desire :)

1

Anonymous #2 1w

Mmm outdated. Overplayed. Go back to pretending you have any ounce of joy in your life

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

You obviously need this more than I do, don’t mind doing a little charity work now and then

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Idk my court jester, I disappear for hours without thinking about you and you come to my beck and call whenever I want! Seems someone is far more eager than they are letting on 😆

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Damn nobody fucked with your great news at all in the slightest huh

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Not even one updoot, yikes man maybe you do need this

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Oh the sex advice post? Upvotes only go to memes and hot women on there but all my friends on there saw and DMed me :)) not to mention that I have a lot of people who love me outside this app I celebrated with. I’m sorry all you have is me but it’ll have to do

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Lowkey reactivated the whole discord with the news tbh ngl haha. What can I say people love me :)

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

I’ve posted there a couple times and got upvoted, got like 20 something when I got a raise. They can sense those that are pure of heart

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Court jester, you do realize that relationships and people exist off of yikyak too right? I’m concerned for you :(

-3

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

All your friends didn’t leave a comment congratulating you?

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Funny enough they ended up coming into the comments of my USPol posts off there. Clicked my profile to see em and liked my posts on this board so much they engaged on here :)

5

Anonymous #2 1w

Wish I could see your post history but I can see why you don’t leave it on. I can imagine it’s pretty sad

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

They still couldn’t congratulate you tho

0

Anonymous #2 1w

They literally did when I DMed them after a few comments :) do you think all interaction on here must happen in public court jester?

1

Anonymous #2 1w

Or is that simply the way you do it because you require the external validation so much that if you didn’t get it you’d end it all?

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Seems a tiny bit hypocritical to talk about external validation when I’m talking about a post that you posted for external validation

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Why are you assuming such things jester? I posted it to let the people on there who know me about what’s up in my life :) and also I kinda use sex advice as a lil journal. Therapy stuff😋

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Its okay egg, I used to sit next to this kid at school who would talk about his “friends” like this too

-1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Ya know, the things social media were used for before everyone become attention hungry freaks. But I know you wouldn’t get that ;(

1

Anonymous #2 1w

I know it’s hard for you to conceive of the idea of making real genuine connections online or in person but it is possible :)

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Who is letting this self obsessed model talk about the downfalls of social media and attention seeking :(

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Your existence is the pursuit of vanity, a performance companies use to try to get my money

0

Anonymous #2 1w

It’s it that hard for to comprehend that maybe I’m far more complex of a person than you are able to glean from a yikyak argument? I hope you sit with this one jester. I’m gonna let you go and ruminate for a bit on the complexity of people. A narcissistic model communist who is hyper aware of and anti-attention seeking social media behavior

-1

Anonymous #2 1w

Maybe like modeling because I like to wear cool clothes and I love fashion and I love photography? Not everything is as narrow as you assume. Think about this jester and I’ll be back in the morning

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Keep performing little model boy, I just might throw your boss a couple dollars to buy whatever product they sell

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Nothing I do is a performance. Authentic people exist. I don’t pretend. I don’t put on a mask. It’s far too exhausting. Every word I’m telling you is genuinely me. Comprehend that for a while jester. Your king has given you great wisdom

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Modeling is a performance, your job is to look a certain way so that I the consumer is compelled to consume

0

Anonymous #2 1w

You have a fundamental misunderstanding of the profession from the lens of a model. It’s an art to me. My body and face are the canvas and the set is the frame and clothing is the paint. Not everyone views the world so strictly

5

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Yes, my goal is to compel you. But not to buy. To feeeeeel something. Because it is a masterpiece work of art

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Your body is the canvas in which the product is displayed to be sold, but don’t worry egg if you do a good job performing, they will let you canvas nicer clothes!

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

If that’s what you need to tell yourself sure

0

Anonymous #2 1w

None of that matters to me? Does the canvas care what its painter paints? Or why? No. It only cares if it’s beautiful

1

Anonymous #2 1w

Ur deeply cynical and strict view of the world makes me genuinely, for the first time, feel bad for you.

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

It seems at the end of the day, the canvas really only does care for its own vanity, not for the message or for the art

-1

Anonymous #2 1w

No? It cares explicitly for the art. It must be beautiful. It must be artistic. It must compel people to feel something

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

I’m not going to torture myself over the fact that the purpose fundamentally is to sell, because so many people find such greater purpose and meaning to it

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

That’s art. That’s always been art.

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

At least you know that your primary function is to sell clothes, because at the end of the day that’s the real art…. Overconsumption

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Just think someday you might make it on TV! People all around the country can listen to your ad while looking at their phones waiting for the commercial break to end

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Every job that everyone has serves that purpose. What am I to do hm? I simply find my purpose, find my beauty, and commit to it for a greater reason than that. Nothing more revolutionary except actual revolution

1

Anonymous #2 1w

I do editorial. The shoots I do are explicitly artistic. I’m not even a commercial model!

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Capitalism is the greatest evil ever inflicted upon humanity, Americans are just Stockholm syndrome’d + Red Scare’d into thinking communism is when no food and billions dead

8

Anonymous #1 1w

Tell me you’ve never read political theory without telling me

4

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Americans don’t read, don’t bother explaining material conditions or political theory to them, it’s in one ear and out the other, they still think a free market works 😭

4

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

OH damn my bad homie, you said model and I thought you were like one of those real models or something

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Almost as if poorer countries were the countries where material conditions made revolution / leftist governance more likely 😱

4

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Only a model would think that every other job is pushing over consumption

0

Anonymous #2 1w

Editorial models are a step above commercial models. You’re simply demonstrating your lack of knowledge on this subject. The highest level is Couture models

1

Anonymous #2 1w

U.S. is higher than China per capita in 2025 btw which is why you needed the outdated chart

3

Anonymous #3 1w

He said per capita doesn’t matter as much as net emissions when comparing scale because “it’s the net total that warms the climate” as if we aren’t explicitly trying to scale this properly

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

That’s pretty cool, so if not a company that sells things what do you model

0

Anonymous #2 1w

I model for fashion magazines and such. Highest level would be like Vogue

1

Anonymous #3 1w

Oh damn my bad, so you telling me China produces less pollution than the other countries on that list?

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

You might get there someday

0

Anonymous #2 1w

I genuinely could I actually have pretty clear path

1

Anonymous #2 1w

On a per capita basis yes, ofc a country with 1.4 billion people will have more emissions than a country with 300 million, they have, idk, 1.1 billion more people?? Do you have any thoughts behind that thick skull?

4

Anonymous #3 1w

India is lower than the USA no? And they have, idk, 1.1 billion more people

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Good for you

0

Anonymous #3 1w

He said that doesn’t matter cause some big countries still pollute less. I mentioned that’s because of different levels of industrialization and he then ignored that argument

0

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Oh wait he didn’t ignore it. He circled back to “oh no but that mean they pollute more still” or some shit like that.

1

Anonymous #2 1w

They’re also way poorer, people who don’t have electricity are obv not gonna use as much fuel, lots of India still relies on burning wood / organic material for fuel, people in poverty don’t use fossil fuels like those of us in the developed world

2

Anonymous #3 1w

I think that your point is valid but I think the main distinction between state capitalism and socialism with a market is how much is the leader a true believer tbh. And xi is a true believer

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

Are they really gonna transition to socialism and are they clearly lead by a leader who is firm in their beliefs and has a clear vision

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

If you’re just going to say “ermm well obviously it’s because theres more people duhh” then yeah its the easiest rebuttal

0

Anonymous #2 1w

No cause it’s completely circular. I already proved that point ur using to reply with wrong lol

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

yeah, and that’s why I think there’s nuance in this conversation, we have similar thoughts on this

1

Anonymous #3 1w

I figured from ur comment we would. I’m curious on ur thoughts on Xi? Everything I’ve read about him describes him as a full blooded true believer, from Chinese docs to US intelligence

1

Anonymous #2 1w

Not all countries exist in a vacuum, some countries, like Saudi Arabia (biggest polluter per capita) have economies that rely on fossil fuel exports and thus use a lot of their own resources, they don’t “hate the climate,” they’re just ran by a greedy royal family taking advantage of the most expensive asset they own India has less emissions than China bc they’re less developed, less developed = more people in extreme poverty, people in extreme poverty use less fossil fuels bc they can’t afford

3

Anonymous #2 1w

I hope you find ur art, and I think when you do you’ll remember this whole thread and chuckle at urself now

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

You’ll probably still think I’m a dick but that’s just cause I kinda am :)

1

Anonymous #3 1w

I think Saudi Arabia really is a perfect example of why per capita metrics are misleading, a small population with a fossil fuel driven economy of course would look terrible on that metric while having little total impact on the world compared to a massive industrial country. Per capita tells you more about the structure of the economy, total emissions tell you how it effects the planet

1

Anonymous dumbegg 1w

I have my art, to me its camping/hiking. I truly don’t think there’s a better feeling in the world

1

Anonymous #2 1w

Find a way to make that ur purpose and you’ll see what I mean

5