
Your logic is circular af. Name one instance where an activity becomes less morally acceptable when it’s consensual and maybe I could see your point. Until then, I will consider consent to be the baseline of basic morality. I’m simply asking you to provide evidence to support your point.
Does it improve the lives of as many people as possible with minimal detriment to others? If so it’s probably good. And we should pursue good because… people living comfortably provides a safe environment for personal and communal growth? Idk how to phrase it besides saying that good stuff is good. What would you suggest?