Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
call me crazy level of hater but republicans would scream snowflake if democrats abused power to prove one of their ideological stances. I can’t wait until the rest of this country gets mamdanistan’ifed so we can deal with real issues not made up bullshit
40 upvotes, 39 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in General. "call me crazy level of hater but republicans would scream snowflake if democrats abused power to prove one of their ideological stances. I can’t wait until the rest of this country gets mamdanistan’ifed so we can deal with real issues not made up bullshit"
you’re mad cause you got 6th to one person? this feels like crazy copium. it’s not like the other people in the top 4 were people who were born with more than average testosterone . Why didn’t you get better? You can’t outtrain one trans person?
upvote 40 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 12w

It’s also funny that they don’t realize a trans woman on E for at minimum a year are no higher in capabilities than your average cis woman. They’re just mad and want to control. And then cis women would blame the trans athletes for their losses even though it’s a fair game

upvote 20 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 12w

MAGA is a pedophilic cancer to this country

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 12w

I think you’d be surprised that the majority of democrat women also believe this. They’ll call a transgender person by their preferred pronouns, support them medically transitioning, but they do not want transwomen in women sports.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 12w

Fuck maga but also isn’t the burden of proof on the people claiming men can turn into women?

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 12w

I also love the phrase mamdanistan’ifed. I want to use it

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12w

just to be clear, trans women ARE women

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 12w

Yeah that’s called an assertion

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12w

It’s a fact, I’m asserting the fact at worst

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12w

look up “Trevor project ally to trans people” for a basic overview. look up “gender book second gumroad” for a free book on all things trans. there’s also so many other resources that can explain this. the burden of proof rests on a mountain of evidence.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 12w

Ur asserting it’s a fact but give no epistemological grounding, its ad bad argument

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12w

You haven’t asked for any. I however will ask. Are you willing to define sex and gender and if you are, do it.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 12w

How can someone stand for women’s rights when women isn’t even a term anyone agrees on, again u people have no epistemology it’s all just assertions and appeal to emotion

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12w

That’s not an answer. Great deflection. Go ahead. I asked. Engage honestly! You can’t!

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 12w

Well when you make a claim it’s on you to give grounding for the claim, sex and gender are biological and tied to the chromosomes, ur gonna bring up some bs about how there’s a difference between sex and gender but that difference is a modern aberration by the social sciences

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12w

I asked you to define the terms, not tell me how similar they are. Go ahead. One more time, this time do what I asked.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12w

girl the fields of biology, psychology, history, archeology, sociology and gender studies are WAY ahead of you. the proof is there in droves lol

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 12w

Lmao I gave a definition, chromosomes, XX XY, how it’s always been defined historically

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 12w

Are you slow? History is ahead of me? That’s not even what history is, it doesn’t ‘develop’. Biology agrees with me, psychology isn’t a field that can override biologies definitions, it studies the human mind which can study gender dysphoria but not sex and gender itself, same w gender studies, sociology can study how gender influences society but again doesn’t give concrete definition and cannot override biology

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12w

For both terns?

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12w

terms*

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12w

“why aren’t you giving any evidence!!!!1!” after I gave you an entire book that explains what you asked about lmao

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12w

wrong! ASAB has never been about chromosomes. you ask for burden of proof then refuse to back up your blatantly false info lmao

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 12w

The distinction between the terms is relatively novel, the case that they are different is only valid if you are saying male and female has traditionally been used to describe linguistic differences (masculine vs feminine language). Distinguishing is fine, but too often the line gets blurred to where the claim becomes that the actual biological categories change, which I reject

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 12w

That’s an appeal to authority, if u cant backup ur claim without me reading an entire book by a single author it’s not a position worth defending. JUST READ MORE MARX I SWEAR!!! Also idk what asab is so please enlighten me, im not saying sexuality is based on chromosomes, but im saying sex is

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12w

apparently linking evidence is an “appeal to authority” to the Reddit fake-intellectual who misuses high school rhetoric terms lmao

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 12w

You think think basic logical fallacies are just “high school rhetoric”. Another obvious flag that ur worldview is based on feels. You’ve clearly never given any thought to anything ‘True’.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12w

also it’s by multiple authors who use both real-world testimonies and back it up with studies. it’s literally made to be easily read. and I linked an article in case you were too stubborn to even look at the book. genuinely, how do you expect anyone to respect your opinion if you don’t look at the evidence YOU asked for? you’re a joke lol

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12w

it’s not a logical fallacy to tell you to read up on something that contains a lot of nuance. you don’t even know what an appeal to authority is lmao.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 12w

Because I asked YOU to define it, I didn’t ask YOU just for you to tell me to go lookup someone else’s explanation

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12w

“how DARE you make me go look at a source explaining this nuanced concept in-depth! you should overtly simplify it into a paragraph so I can be mad about it!” gonna ignore your comments until you suck it up and read any of the sources YOU asked for. ik you have the time to read it given how you responded so quickly 🫶

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 12w

Appeal to authority is when you act like just because these authors (who I presume are credentialed) say it it makes it ‘true’. I’ve read many sources from ur side and ooo shocker none of them agree even with each other, hence why I asked YOU to give me YOUR explanation so that I can engage properly. If the position is that women and men are categories we can arbitrarily redefine whenever then I’ve done everything I needed to do and have shown that you don’t even believe there is ‘Truth’

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 12w

Hahaha lmao u strawmanned me u clearly have 0 experience engaging in genuine debate

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12w

are you in school? if so, I’m really curious to know what you’re majoring in. It sounds counterintuitive, but history DOES develop, in the sense that our understanding of it develops as we discover artifacts, writings, etc. also, I hate to say that the field of biology does not agree with you unfortch.

upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 12w

I doubt engaging with him will do much, wish you luck tho

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 12w

yeah i really love how much yapping happens in these comments but im very appreciative someone else is actually doing the engaging. I was doing a day trip today and was in and out of signal and you two(one transphobic) silly beans kept serving me notifications

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 12w

one time someone told me she used my notifications as a vibrator during a car ride, so I comment a lot in case I see her again ❤️

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 12w

you seemed tapped out, so I thought I’d tap back in lol. I like the adrenaline of the fight

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 12w

i legit almost used a variation of this joke for you all. makes me thing home boy #2 is rage baiting to get attention

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 12w

Okay, then my next question. Can a woman have a penis?

upvote 5 downvote