Anonymous #1 4w

How is it any less than religion?

14

Anonymous OP 4w

What? Virtually no historians think Jesus is a mythical figure.

23

Anonymous #2 4w

Jesus isn’t real anymore, he lived and died

39

Anonymous #4 4w

Even in this case, saying “Jesus loves you” would be equivalent to saying “George Washington love you,” or any other person no longer with us for that matter

27

Anonymous OP 4w

George Washington does love me, you’re so right! Thanks for saying that 🥰

20

Anonymous #1 4w

Neither is Christianity

11

Anonymous #7 4w

How so?

-3

Anonymous #2 4w

Well unicorns have a huge horn on their head. Jesus got stabbed a bunch. Unicorns 1 Jesus 0

42

Anonymous #4 4w

I just feel like, with what ive read about this jesus fellow, he doesnt seem the type to enjoy nor endorse violent/aggressive tactics to enforce a belief. He seemed more into being nice to people

24

Anonymous #3 4w

He lived, died, was resurrected, and is alive in heaven.

-4

Anonymous #9 4w

There are also unicorns in heaven

27

Anonymous OP 4w

Relevant how?

-7

Anonymous #8 4w

Jesus literally rose from the dead and defeated death

-9

Anonymous #9 4w

Pics or it didnt happen

23

Anonymous #8 4w

lol

-1

Anonymous #2 4w

None of that exists. Grow up.

17

Anonymous #4 4w

Yeah, no, any possible extrabiblical evidence is scanty and hearsay at best.

9

Anonymous #10 4w

Right, but the Bible itself is good evidence, as it was written by real people who wrote about him. Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were real and knew him, we also have the letters of St. Peter (which were turned into the two books of the Bible). There’s also writings from historians such as Quadratus, Flavius Josephus, Tacitus, Suetonius, Lucian of Samosata, and Thallus. We’ve also found archeological evidence of Roman crucifixions and Nazareth existing.

-3

Anonymous #10 4w

But also, he was a wandering peasant. How many wandering peasants from 2000+ years ago leave evidence of their existence? He wasn’t important to anyone until after he died. So it makes sense there’s no archeological footprint. You don’t have to be a Christian to agree that yeah, a dude named Jesus who grew up in Nazareth was probably real, and was probably killed by the Roman’s in a crucifixion. But wether he is the son of god, the messiah, or magic healing man is up to you

-2

Anonymous #4 4w

And yet none of those were written until long after, the four gospels are inconsistent and contradictory, and very little is said beyond speculation or what was already established by early Christians that spread around in the same way we know about Greek/Roman myths. Roman crucifixion at the time contradicts biblical account of it as well. I can quote genetic engineering and SpiderMan comics and the places and events in the comics based on real-world ideas, still doesn’t make him real.

6

Anonymous #4 4w

Yeah, no. Still don’t have any archaeological proof of him nor anything not originating from the early cult. Time to grow up.

8

Anonymous #4 4w

Replied to me then immediately blocked me before I could even read the replies. What a waste of a comment

-1

Anonymous #4 4w

It’s ok I read it

1

Anonymous #9 4w

At least someone in the cosmos did 🫡

3

We know unicorns don't exist. We know Jesus does.

-3

Anonymous #1 4w

Neither do, actually.

4

Anonymous #10 4w

That's not true. What notable historians would agree with you?

0

Anonymous #1 4w

Some “so and so said and heard it from so and so” is not proof. If some little miracle worker was walking around and had a bunch of followers, we’d have extrabiblical confirmation. Not just “this is what christians believe”. I don’t care if they want to placate to the abrahamic cults, we don’t have any proof of some dude “Jesus”, and definitely none of miracles.

1

Anonymous #10 4w

I'll ask again, what significant historians are Jesus mythicists? If there are none, why do you think that you know better than those who have spent their lives studying history?

0

Anonymous #1 4w

Speculation to appease cultists≠proof. So, where is the proof?

1

Anonymous #10 4w

“[Jesus Christ] certainly existed, as virtually every competent scholar of antiquity, Christian or non-Christian, agrees, based on certain and clear evidence." Quote from Bart Ehrman, an agnostic biblical historian, who thinks that certain claims, such as the Divinity of Christ, are later additions to the Christan faith and not genuine teachings of Christ Himself. Do you think he said this simply to appeal to Christians? Do you think the other scholars he references also...

-1

Anonymous #1 4w

engage in the same level of dishonesty? He has a whole book on the subject called 'Did Jesus Exist?', which this quote is taken from.

-1

Anonymous #1 4w

Cool, saying he existed doesn’t make that so. Spider-Man’s got some comics and they have real world inspirations, Spider-Man still isn’t real.

10

I mean I’d argue any amount of time and energy is kinda too much for this, but also OP is ragebaiting in the comments so it’s not like they just tossed that out there and forgot about it.

1

Anonymous #10 4w

Ok, so just to be clear, you think that virtually every competent scholar of antiquity is either mistaken or engaging in dishonesty when it comes to the existence of Jesus of Nazareth? Is that an accurate summary of your position? I don't want to misrepresent you, so if I'm wrong, then please correct me.

-1

Anonymous #1 4w

Wow they engaged with you longer than me before blocking. Good on you 🫡

2

Anonymous #4 4w

I haven't been blocked, they just stopped responding lol. And I'm engaging moreso for anyone who comes across this post. They seem to have their mind made up, but others who are more open may be persuaded.

-1

Anonymous #11 3w

What is angry about my post?

9

You guys are still here?

-2