
Yea but HP isnt as harmful as animal agriculture is. Animal agriculture has a much larger negative effect radius, by ruining the environment, affecting marginalized communities, literally directly harming animals, and perpetuating many of the top diseases that affect and kill humans.
I didnt. I already said that that would be a survival reason and therefore justified, FOR THEM. Just because a select few are physically incapable of being vegan, doesnt give everyone else the right to exploit animals. And even then it’s still not exactly moral bc why does one person’s condition allow for them to harm others? We wouldnt accept that in any other injustice. Say someone has some condition where they can only eat dog and cat flesh, would it be morally acceptable for them to?
Depends on wether they’re alive or dead already and if they consent to being eaten. There’s ways to kill animals where they will not realise they’re going to die, and then die quickly, like separating a chickens skull from its spinal column. The chicken does not know what the axe does, it does not know it will die. If you lead a human to a guillotine, because we have previous knowledge of it, the person would know, and be afraid. So it depends on a few things for me. But morally neutral
I’d also say that I don’t believe many people would kill someone to eat them, even if they needed to survive. In most cases of survival cannibalism I know of, the people were previously dead. Unrelated, I know of some tribes that previously (and potentially currently) practice funerary cannibalism. I’d say it’s morally neutral because they believe that they are helping the persons soul. It’s not out of malice, but care.