
Adoption is pricey, like 20,000+ dollars pricey. It’s traumatic- the biological family is traumatized, the child (no matter the age) is traumatized, and the adoptive parents are often faced with difficult conversations, choices, and emotions around it. Adoption is NOT for everyone, and guilting young couples for not choosing it is NOT going to benefit anyone, certainly not the kids.
Literally! As someone who was born through IVF, I am not the least bit traumatized about knowing I was born like that because there's really nothing to be traumatized about. Oh no.. My parents had fertility issues so they seeked medical intervention... The horror. Like that is NOTHING compared to an old friend of mine who was literally separated from his siblings due to the foster care system.
IVF on the other hand is generally a less traumatizing experience- the kid knows fundamentally that they are wanted and loved, there is no fears of abandonment, there is no difficult family connections between bio family and adoptive family, and the parents do not need to navigate what is a long, exhaustive legal process. It is OK to prefer one method over another, ESPECIALLY SINCE ITS YOUR MONEY AND YOUR LIFE.
As an international adoptee this is particularly apt, when you adopt you are not ‘replacing’ having a child, you are taking a child someone already had, could not or would not take care of, and raising them in an environment foreign (quite literally in my case) to them as though they were your own, flaws and features all included. Adoption does not exist on the same page let alone book as IVF, foster care, or just having sex.
Lastly, I find these conversations particularly frustrating as an adoptee. Many people starting these arguments over bio kids vs adoption/fostering in reality are NOT adopted themselves and come from biological families. The issue is that their perspectives on the “issue” lack one key element- which is that adoption is TRAUMATIC. ALL THE TIME, EVERY TIME. And successful adoptions happen when adoptive parents are completely aware of this and are well equipped to deal with this trauma.
2. Have no issues feeling integrated to the culture I live in. Adopting a child is just as random as having a biological one, and typically they have more mental health problems associated with a lack of feeling of security as an infant. Whatever you do, do your research. Adoption is as beautiful as having a biological child, it just comes with different hardships.
1. Yes I have a twin sister who was adopted (she is my age so we’re essentially twins). Obviously my parents love both of us equally and did everything they could to enrich her in her own culture, but aside from the trauma of not knowing why her biological parents gave her up and that separation, she is a woman of color who was raised in a White environment. She has a TON of trauma associated with it all. Now I have many other friends adopted at the same time from the same culture, who seem to
As someone whose mother was adopted and who has a brother that was placed for adoption when my parents were in their teens, I can vouch and say that adoption is never as easy or cut and dry as other like to say. It’s why I’m pursuing a masters of social work. Even my professors barely talk about adoption
and I totally agree your whole “adoption is trauma” part. We’re both talking about the same thing. It’s the people who want to be parents for the “experience” and the blood relation, when they don’t consider something like adoption. I believe anyone who wants a kid should be trauma and psychology of development informed to be ready to be a parent. This would then qualify them for most any kid.
Unfortunately that is not a reality for many aspiring parents. Adopted children deserve to have meaningful parental relationships with people who are always intending to adopt and are willing to navigate those complicated relationships and mental states with their adopted children. For example, my adoption was an open adoption, meaning my birth mother and family were somewhat present in my life growing up. That is/was an incredibly difficult situation to navigate, and not everyone can.
IVF is not at all a long legal process, sure there are some papers for what to do with residual embryos but that is it. I am intimately aware of the process of IVF and the price points because 4 of my siblings were born through IVF. It is not at all similar to adoption in either price point or legal process. The only exception to this is if you have to do multiple rounds of IVF- only then can it get close to the price point of adoption.
Not necessarily- depends on the situation entirely. Family reunification should ALWAYS be priority but is not always an option depending on why the child is being put up for adoption. Truth is adoptions are not monolithic- no two adoptees have two similar backgrounds. What I can guarantee is that separating a child from their family is always traumatic, no matter the situation
I had an open adoption, but my siblings did not. They absolutely struggle(d) with feelings of abandonment and self esteem as a result of being adopted, even though they were babies. The feelings of loss and grief transcend age. I got more closure from my adoption being open where theirs were closed, but neither is less traumatic than the other. Happy to talk more about it in DMs if you’re genuinely curious
Uh no, if it were not for adoption, I would likely not be here writing this reply to you. While I love my parents (and I don't consider my biological 'parents', who never parented me, to be parents), l am unable to forget that my current livelihood is only by virtue of a decision that my parents made when I was two. It has shaped me into a person who is conservative in existential sense. Starting out in a foreign orphanage with nothing, I always seek to be secure in all that I have.