Anonymous #1 2d

🫩 ight man

5

Anonymous #1 2d

lol you sound so soft man. It was a bs red card. FIFA actually did the right thing at the end

3

Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 2d

There have been hundreds of BS red cards given in the history of FIFA not a single one came without a one game suspension. Two wrongs don’t make a right. What’s soft is acknowledging that the U.S. had no recourse so Diddy pedo president Trump called his pedophile buddy infantino and got this reversed

5

Anonymous #1 2d

So you’re mad someone had the balls to actually stand up against a BS call and do something about it and pressure FIFA into doing the right thing? Got it lmao

1

Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 2d

They didn’t do the right thing. A red card on field bad or not is a red card. There again have been hundreds of bad red cards this is the first to be overturned. Are you Ok with the idea that every red card should be looked into now? Every red card should be appealed? The precedent is unheard of and unsustainable. England is now considering protesting their player’s red yesterday. He got the ball is he right to go to the government and have it fixed? irrelevant to the call it’s procedural issues

1

Anonymous #1 2d

Yes every red card should be looked into just like every suspension in literally every other major league sport is looked into by a committee lmao The ref blatantly went out of his way to fuck us over and he knows it. It’s not the first time he’s done suspicious stuff. If anything, fifa is to blame for allowing him into the tournament in the first place. Look at his shady dealings in 2023. If something is rightfully bs, it should be overturned. It’s that simple

3

Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 2d

Ok. So right now England’s player should be eligible for the quarter finals?

1

Anonymous #1 2d

Did I say he should be eligible? No All I said is every red card should be looked into by a committee. It’s that simple

1

Anonymous #1 2d

Also lil bro this is not the first red card in history be overturned lol

1

Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 2d

Yes it is. They cite the Ronaldo situation but he served a game. He’s the first player to ever and serving a suspension for a red card. Many players have served a game and had a larger sentence knocked down to one or two games. Many have been suspended served an international game suspension by missing qualifying and friendly then played in the WC. NOT A ONE has avoided missing any time at all.

-2

Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 2d

Ever avoid serving a suspension**

1

Anonymous #1 2d

You do realize Balogun’s suspension is just suspended for a year, right? He’ll still have to serve it just like Ronaldo and just like the countless other red cards that were suspended or overturned whichever nomenclature you want to use

1

Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 2d

Yes and every other instance of this was a game served. It was a multi game ban where the 2nd, 3rd, and so on games in a suspension. Often because the international play WC qualifiers and Friendlies ended. So the next possible game to serve was literally a year out. Very different circumstances. It’s such a bad precedent and legit has no relation to the Ronaldo situation

-1

Anonymous #1 2d

It’s not different at all lol. Balogun still has to serve a 1 game suspension… just not right now

1

Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 2d

Every other player served a game then was told the rest is suspended it’s legit the most different it can be. He didn’t miss any time every other player DID

1

Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 2d

Again mostly done as a procedural thing because international reds don’t carry over to league play, fifa grants that exemption so that a foul in an international tournament doesn’t bar a player from playing in the prem or Bundesliga or any other league. this is a complete misuse of the rulebook

1

Anonymous #1 2d

He hasn’t missed time…. Yet Ronaldo didn’t have to serve his suspension until a year later. Balogun will have to do the same. It’s literally that similar

1

Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 2d

BECAUSE THERE WERE NO INTERNATIONAL GAMES TO SERVE. He then served it leading up to the WC

-3

Anonymous #1 2d

Ronaldo should have been suspended the first two games of his WC per the rules. He was not

6

Anonymous #1 2d

We got a pick-me american over here 😂

1

Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 2d

Yes he should have been suspended and the rule should never have been invoked. Again two wrongs don’t make a right. These are both disastrous decisions.

1

Anonymous #1 2d

But above and on other threads said this has never happened before and now you’re saying it’s the second instance of this happening. Which is it, buddy? 🤣

6

Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 2d

No it’s never happened because these situations are not the same. They aren’t close to the same FIFA is using an irrelevant Ronaldo situation to justify this one. That’s my point. This is singular and stands alone.

1

Anonymous #1 2d

A player (Ronaldo & Balogun) has been granted permission to not serve their red card suspension (Ronaldo the first two games of this WC and Balogun tonight’s game)

1

Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 2d

Yup. Completely dissimilar

1

Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 2d

He served a game of his three game suspension. He didn’t appeal until after his first game served. Literally different in every way

1

Anonymous #1 2d

FIFA accommodated him so that he could play in this WC despite the decision. The same is happening with Balogun. It’s the same

1

Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 2d

Wrongly in both dissimilar instances. Red card one game should be non negotiable even if wrong.

1

Anonymous #1 2d

That’s false. You don’t just reward wrong stuff. You fix wrong stuff

1

Anonymous greenquarter 1d

Peep the username

1

Anonymous thehatecentral 1d

Oh fair I just am dialed in on this match

1

Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 1d

But the issue wasn’t that it was not a red card offense. It’s that A) the ref on field was blowing dick and missed it and B) the VAR official only showed slow motion. The most wrong thing that happened was the official missing the original call.

1

Anonymous #1 1d

Exactly so you fix it as it was (:

1

Anonymous littlepenis_never_dies 1d

They did BY CALLING A RED CARD

1

Anonymous #1 1d

Calling a red card was a mistake lol

1

Anonymous greenquarter 1d

😂 what I tell you

1

Anonymous thehatecentral 1d

You spoke it into existence it’s your fault

1

Anonymous greenquarter 1d

Yes, yes I did 🫵😂

1