Anonymous #1 4w

Not all but some, our holy book doesn’t have rules for divorce, and 2nd marriages for girls who have yet to menstruate, nor did the greatest man in our religion marry a 6 year old

-4

Anonymous OP 4w

Yet, all of your Christian ancestors who were settlers from Europe, killed & r@ped all indigenous tribes that were here in the Americas lmao, all religions are stupid and made for scapegoating.

15

Anonymous #1 4w

Wrong

-1

Anonymous #1 4w

Wars were waged, battles were fought. A lot of raping and killing happened on both sides. Many native peoples were committing Genocide against each other long before, during, and after European settlers came. Many of my ancestors were also native to South America, and the Inca were not innocent people either

-1

Anonymous #1 4w

There’s only one religion that not just excuses, but glorifies a man in his 50s marrying a 6 year old, and consummating that marriage when she was 9 year old. There’s only one religion where their holy book has rules about the proper way to marry a prepubescent girl after she gets divorced. That religion is Islam

-3

Anonymous OP 4w

You can’t handle that your own religion is just as bad if not worse. You claim to be all enlightened, you’re just not. Critical thinking doesn’t work for you. Again all religions are scapegoats. Your whole disgusting ideology revolves around submitting yourself to a non existent capitalist god. Your Jewish brothers are involved in Brit Milah for newborns, sucking the foreskin of newborns claiming to be part of the religion. Haha You’re a clown.

7

Anonymous #1 4w

What does capitalism have to do my God? And yeah I don’t like Brit milah either. You said god doesn’t exist. Can you prove that?

-2

Anonymous OP 4w

Burden of proof is w u broski

6

Anonymous #2 4w

I would disagree, I think the burden of proof is on the people claiming that, the universe came out of nothing, and that life came from non-life. It’s much easier to claim that there is a god that live outside of time, that created our universe, and created living organisms.

1

Anonymous OP 4w

It has literally been proven that life can originate from no life, given the right conditions. In this case the burden of proof falls on you bc u claim the existence of a god. Someone who disagrees isn’t the one who has to prove something. The initial statement is yours, so you prove it

1

Anonymous OP 4w

Same difference, the main thing I was pointing to is that the organic building blocks of life can emerge from inorganic matter. There’s still theories on how organic matter led to cellular organisms and there’s debates on the importance of amino acids vs RNA, etc. However, the main point is that you’re being extremely disingenuous and frankly deflecting, because at the end of the day you can’t prove the existence of a god, much less your specific god.

1

Anonymous #2 4w

You do realize that organic means the bond between carbon and hydrogen, it doesn’t mean life forms.

1

Anonymous OP 4w

If you read one line further you would see ‘building blocks of life’. Must be hard when you’re illiterate so I’ll allow it. Keep deflecting though

1

Anonymous #2 3w

Building blocks doesn’t mean anything if there is no life in it. Everything that has a beginning must have a cause. Just because we can make organic matter doesn’t mean we can create life. It’s not a deflection it’s just a fact

1

Anonymous OP 3w

Genuine illiteracy at display. You’re deflecting on proving the existence of your god. Going on this whole tangent just bc you can’t fulfill the burden of proof. Once again, keep deflecting

1

Anonymous #2 3w

How is it “genuine illiteracy” and how am I deflecting

1

Anonymous OP 3w

It’s like talking to a wall 🤦‍♂️understand why the first commenter stopped responding. Keep living in your play pretend world

1