Anonymous #1 2w

Yeah his foot is planted he didn’t stamp eze

2

Anonymous #1 2w

You can watch hancko draw his foot away from eze at the moment the OG post screenshot, which is why it’s a screenshot

1

Anonymous OP 2w

There’s contact idk what to say if you don’t see it. If it’s not given initially that’s fine since it’s lowkey soft. But once it’s given there’s not just not enough to overturn it. 13 replays for a clear and obvious error?

1

Anonymous #1 2w

It depends on what part the foul was called, if the initial pen was for the coming together that didn’t happen before this it would be clear and obvious and then he wanted to inspect if the follow through was a pen, id never want to see this level of contact given so I’m happy with the outcome

1

Anonymous OP 2w

From refs pov the contact foot-foot is most likely what he saw to call it. Given there is contact there’s not enough to overturn it. It’s soft but the complaint is with the ref not following the rules of the game. I don’t think either team really deserved a win but it’s a big call to overturn it when it’s not clear and obvious and it’s a high stakes game

1