Anonymous #1 1d

Still crying about them "cheating"

0

Anonymous OP 1d

Oh you’re one of those people doesn’t think the scenario stank to high hell

3

Anonymous #1 1d

One of many. It's silly for trump to get involved but it wasn't a red card so no advantage was gained. There was still a net loss from it

0

Anonymous OP 1d

We can argue the severity of the card all day long. Doesn’t change the fact that a head of state getting involved sets a bad precedent

5

Anonymous #1 1d

Much worse has been done the past. That was pretty tame

0

Anonymous OP 1d

And much less has gotten a red as well. He did nearly break his ankle, in my opinion that’s a red.

5

Anonymous #1 1d

He was just running forward. This is why reviews aren't shown in slow motion

0

Anonymous OP 1d

Even in real time, that looked pretty bad. Studs on ankle is almost always a red. And just curious, how long have you been watching the game for?

5

Anonymous #1 1d

Looked like a completely normal play the ref was just planning on screwing up the game. Been watching for a very long time

0

Anonymous OP 1d

How long is very long? Because 99% of times that’s a red. And accusing the ref of bias is crazy lol, that was a fairly well officiated game all things considered

6

Anonymous #1 1d

For well over a decade. That ref flew in straight from Sarajevo

0