Soccer on Sidechat | Hate it when people try to debate a definitive “GOAT”. There’s 3 conversations. 1.) Greatest prime. 2.) Greatest overall career 3.) A combination of both. There can be 3 GOATs, all in different categories. It’s not simply black/white

Sidechat

Download

Join communities on Sidechat Download

Soccer 23h

Hate it when people try to debate a definitive “GOAT”. There’s 3 conversations. 1.) Greatest prime. 2.) Greatest overall career 3.) A combination of both. There can be 3 GOATs, all in different categories. It’s not simply black/white

Anonymous 21h

Ok but for example Messi, best ever prime for a player in 2011/12 and the greatest overall career, that is black and white. Ronaldo was great but he was never as consistent and Messi stayed consistently great his entire career. Not for every sport but that’s an example of a clear GOAT

Anonymous 21h

Does the goat of “3” not incorporate the arguments of “1” and “2”? I feel like that’s the definitive goat

Anonymous 21h

GOAT = Greatest Of All Time. It’s a combination of everything

Anonymous

#1 21h

i feel like 1 is for something like Hazard who had a great prime and at the moment was the best player on the planet

Anonymous

#4 20h

Hazard was never the best player on the planet 😂

Anonymous

#2 20h

maybe not the best player on but most inform player

Anonymous

#4 20h

Hazard is a legend and he had an insane prime but I’d still say there were better players in the world. If ur talking 2018/19 hazard then Messi was better or 2016/17 hazard Ronaldo was better

Anonymous

#2 20h

indeed, i agree with you but im saying for category 1; i guess thats debating like someone who at the time was insane rather than longevity

Anonymous

#4 20h

I see

Anonymous

#4 20h

not saying Hazard should be in the goat debate, i could name 15 more deserving players than him 😭