Anonymous #2 10w

Like from the vehicle or in general 😭

-4

Anonymous #2 10w

No visible injuries, very convenient. Don’t expect an ultrasound either.

17

Anonymous #2 10w

The visible injuries would most likely be bruising and swelling, not exactly worth mentioning when the internal bleeding is the clear result of the collision. It’s crazy what being hit by a 4000 lb object at 5 mph can do

-2

Anonymous #3 10w

Probably because he was in the hospital, which is why he rapidly left the scene after being hit

-8

Anonymous OP 10w

I will remain skeptical until hospital records of his injuries are published

39

Anonymous #3 10w

Considering the agent is protected by HIPPA, I doubt intimate records will be revealed

-7

Anonymous #4 10w

Like Portland?

-1

Anonymous OP 10w

They only tell the truth when it benefits their fascist agenda. They lie constantly to the point we should just assume they're lying whenever they say something.

6

Anonymous OP 10w

“At 5mph” Please be fr lmao, even if he did get hit, PLEASE be serious for once in your life. Yup that 5mph assumed hit warrants the *immediate* death penalty with no due process.

12

Anonymous OP 10w

We always demand transparency from our govt including when it comes to health issues like with the president. Only in this case it’s needed for prosecution and defense. He will end up in court for this, if not during this administration then during the next

31

Anonymous #3 10w

I highly doubt he sees a day in court for this and even further doubt he would be convicted. This is turning into a goal post moving effort that hasn’t been attempted in years

-6

Anonymous #5 10w

It’s called self defense and case law is pretty clear on this! Hope this helps

-4

Anonymous #4 10w

Guilty until proven innocent, that’s our nation’s standard right

-1

Anonymous #5 10w

Please tell me you recognize the issue here. Even if she’s guilty of what you think, and tried to hit the ice agent, that doesn’t warrant immediate death. She would’ve been arrested *after* fleeing the scene and given a date in court to have her case seen against a judge and jury. Instead, she was immediately executed with the administration responding with “the agent is wholly immune”. You genuinely can’t see any issue with that?

7

Anonymous OP 10w

Yeah in a court of law not when dealing with fascist traitors

1

Anonymous OP 10w

Doesn’t that seem wrong to you? The idea of federal agents being given the benefit of the doubt no matter what they do, the public being given no evidence as to his innocence, and him just vanishing away to live life quietly?

24

Anonymous #5 10w

I think there is plenty of legal precedent to defend that a suspect acting in an erratic manner in possession of a deadly weapon can be shot by law enforcement in order to protect themselves, their fellow LEOs and the community.

-1

Anonymous OP 10w

Honest question: how do you see this all ending? Everything in our political climate, international relations, and domestic events; how do you honestly predict this all ends?

8

Anonymous OP 10w

There’s historical precedent, indeed, from the 1930s era Germany as well…

4

Anonymous #3 10w

There is literally video evidence of his innocence. I think that if there is not enough evidence to bring a state or federal case against him, he shouldn’t have his life disrupted any further than the grief of having to kill a woman who attempted to kill/harm him

-6

Anonymous #5 10w

Let's hope it ends with Nuremberg style trials

13

Anonymous OP 10w

Oh no the poor Nazi murderer :(

13

Anonymous #5 10w

With Trump continuing to make idiotic claims in order to “own the libs” and never doing anything of value until he either dies or his term ends and we have another election like we have for centuries. He’s a lame duck, not hitler

0

Anonymous OP 10w

I highly, HIGHLY doubt that a woman who just dropped off her kids with no criminal record suddenly decided to kill an ice agent. I’m more inclined to think the guy who was told he has full immunity lost his nerve

22

Anonymous OP 10w

But, you realize that’s just living in denial, right? Things *are* happening right now. You sound exactly like the Germany citizens who claimed that everything was fine if they behaved. People, immigrants (documented and undocumented) and citizens, are being forcibly deported and abused, ice has been given more funding than most local police forces (which makes police afraid of arresting ice for crimes, for fear of conflict - for the few precincts actually willing to), LGBTQIA+ (but especially

5

You’re allowed to ask questions and I’m allowed to defend the officer on a legal basis. I don’t think she knew what she was getting herself into and it shows by her erratic behavior. Had she left when initially asked to and been a “legal observer” on the street like her wife, she’d still be alive

-3

Anonymous OP 10w

Us trans folk) are being targeted, see Texas as they’re testing new attempts to degrade my community’s rights, and have already started actively targeting some of us under the guise of domestic terrorism for “spreading radical gender ideology” (fucking seriously? They’re classifying us queer folk as terrorists as they degrade the constitution), and so much more What do you mean he just makes claims but doesn’t do anything? While I agree trump makes a bunch of idiotic claims, Stephen miller is

7

Anonymous OP 10w

Behind him ensuring the chaos we see is unfolding (along with the heritage foundation)

8

Anonymous #5 10w

Actual full citizens have not been deported that is objectively false. I don’t agree with the rapid pace of which trump is doing this and absolutely agree that there needs to be changes to ICE protocol, but that has been an issue since DHS was reshaped following 9/11. I’m saying that Trump is not hitler and his decisions regarding ICE protocol are only marginally worse than those of Obama or Biden

-2

Anonymous OP 10w

Look, I know things are really weird right now and heated, but I promise you a lot of dangerous things are happening at the hands of our government and this administration. Please be careful and just look out for others, the world is too scary and dangerous to add more to that danger. I can guarantee that the federal government, including Donald trump, does not have your interests in mind; just get prepared and start talking to all your neighbors. Love over hate yk

1

Anonymous #6 10w

If they said it the day of you guys would have said they were lying and defaming a dead woman before he even received medical care. They say it after he’s probably been released from the hospital and waived some of his hippa protections and you guys say they’re making it up. DHS can’t even tell the truth

1

Anonymous OP 10w

It’s not objectively false, you’re being lied to. There’s been citizens in congress testifying both to congress and noem about their partners being deported, and there’s countless other cases of citizens being deported. Regardless, plenty of immigrants here *legally* with valid visas have been deported as well. Additionally, there’s been hundreds of citizens that have been detained by ice and held in detention illegally as well. You don’t understand that it doesn’t matter how much you defend

1

Anonymous #5 10w

If you think I’m a Trump supporter or agree with pretty much anything he’s said or done over the past year, you’re very wrong. There is a massive difference between being an awful president who has made decisions that can be immediately reversed by the following administration and thinking that Trump will be the fall of the United States as a democratic country. If he starts suspending elections or takes actual military action against our allies, I’ll join you guys on the front lines

-1

Anonymous OP 10w

What’s going on. It will never justify it, and the world already sees trump and his clan as fascists. It’s genuinely a matter of yourself now. How comfortable are you with that, even if you delude yourself into thinking it’s all some “witch hunt attack”? Do you genuinely want to support someone known as a fascist, spreading what the world views as fascist white nationalism? It isn’t going to end well for trump in the long term, authoritarian coups like this normally don’t.

7

Anonymous #5 10w

He was democratically elected, wym a coup😭

-1

Anonymous OP 10w

he’s literally preparing the military against Greenland and just kidnapped a foreign leader (it doesn’t matter what Maduro was up to, we do not have jurisdiction). He’s joked about suspending the election under a war multiple times, and has joked about Elon “winning” them the last one. Do you genuinely think that the next election, if it happens, would be under genuine pretenses? And did you forget that he’s using the national guard against citizens (sending each states guard to different

1

Anonymous #5 10w

States) and send the marines to CA for a brief deployment?

1

Anonymous #5 10w

Biden placed a bounty on Maduro, Trump didn’t just vilify him overnight. Is Biden just older, more senile hitler?

-1

Anonymous OP 10w

Is he not forcibly attempting to change the rule of law while skirting the normal measures to do so? It would be classified under a “self-coup” or “auto-coup” Elected leaders can coup their own countries, if you weren’t aware. This is before you take into consideration the heritage foundation backing him legislatively

1

Anonymous OP 10w

I completely disagree with any involvement in Greenland, but once again I doubt Trump will do anything. His rhetoric is absolutely a problem, but his actions are never representative of what he says. That’s why “Trump Always Chickens Out” was trending for months. He is a lame duck and attempting to solidify himself in American history because he’s afraid of being forgotten

-1

Anonymous OP 10w

Did I bring up Biden, or did you? I didn’t justify Biden, you dipshit. Not everyone lives in a black-and-white world like you do. I don’t like Biden either, shocker. Also either way, Biden didn’t fucking kidnap the guy you dumbass.

1

Anonymous OP 10w

Is there a reason why you didn’t mention *anything* about the degradation and revocation of rights here? You couldn’t possibly be in favor of that, could you?

3

Anonymous #5 10w

He just offered $25 million dollars to anyone who did? That’s so much better than. I’m literally telling you that I don’t live in a black and white world either where everyone is hitler or not hitler😭 Trump is continuing many of the decisions that have been a part of the US foreign and domestic policy for decades. I’m saying it’s weird that only he’s considered the next hitler. We’ve had good presidents and bad presidents, history will remember Trump as a bad president, not American Hitler

-1

Anonymous OP 10w

Why won’t you comment on the degradation of civil rights? Is the reason you disagree with Greenland intervention/dissolution of NATO but agree with the rest of trump’s material policies due to being a fucking groyper nazi? What, is he not “nationalist and right wing” enough for you?

1

Anonymous #5 10w

It’s called a character limit and I thought other things were more important for a first message. I don’t believe in any transition support for children and only support adults needing it if deemed a necessary step by a healthcare provider. I also don’t think transition surgeries or hormones should be covered by insurance.

0

Anonymous OP 10w

As for Immigrants, I believe that is a broader problem with ICE than the Trump administration. The ACLU was suing Obama for mistreatment of migrants a decade ago. It’s a broader problem of law enforcement and mass incarceration than it is trump giving the order to harm immigrants

0

Anonymous #5 10w

I just did dumbass😭

0

Anonymous OP 10w

1. It’s not just trans rights being degraded, but effectively everyone who isn’t a cisgender straight white male 2. Take a look at the picture I attached, the rates for minors getting surgical transitions (see rates for gender-affirming surgery with TGD-related diagnosis(transgender and gender diverse, as described by article) are vastly dramatized in major media to achieve a politicized goal of further ostracizing the community from broader society.

1

Anonymous OP 10w

Article name: Prevalence of Gender-Affirming Surgical Procedures Among Minors and Adults in the US Why don’t you think that it should be covered by insurance though, especially for adults? Paste this into your google to see an article by the Lemkin Institute regarding the state of the government towards us trans individuals: Experts Warn U.S. in Early Stages of Genocide Against Trans Americans

1

Anonymous OP 10w

Well, there’s the issue of our immigration system which yes, has always existed because we’ve designed it to exploit immigrants (hence the potentially decades long wait time for naturalization), but you’re not recognizing how trump’s administration specifically is fueling DHS and changing the landscape of the US federal government. Ex: the “bit beautiful bill” provided so much funding to ice that they have more funds that some police precincts, and are more heavily armed

1

Anonymous #5 10w

1. I never said children transitioning was an epidemic, I said I was against it. 2. As for transitions not being covered by insurance, I see it very similarly to how cosmetic surgeries are treated. It may improve mental health, but it is not vital for your survival. 3. I think that ICE should have as much funding as necessary to remove illegal immigrants from this country, though they should be doing it more carefully

-1

Anonymous OP 10w

That's a good boot licker

26

Anonymous #4 10w

Oh my God dude they’re already doing the “Killing those women and children overseas made our soldiers sad :(“ propaganda play except now it’s women here at home

7

Anonymous #9 10w

I did. I’m just saying that the left has moved the goal posts constantly during the past week and one of the stops along the way was “she didn’t even touch him” despite video evidence

-1

Anonymous OP 10w

Oh yeah agreed, people also defend their beliefs even when they’re proved wrong. That goes for both parties though

0

Anonymous OP 10w

That’s not how HIPPA works

10

Anonymous #5 10w

“Even if she is guilty of what you think” OK, let’s break this down real quick: if you hit someone with a car, that is essentially battery with a deadly weapon. You know what you’re allowed to do if someone’s trying to do that? Defend yourself. If you have a gun and you have to defend yourself, you shoot to kill. You don’t shoot to maime or disable. That is firearm usage 101. stop trying to push that it was an execution, that’s fucking stupid.

1

Anonymous OP 10w

Hey, so any sane person would say that standing in front of someone’s car and threatening them eliminates you from claiming self-defense.

2