Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
We will stop calling you guys fascist when you stop acting like fascists. “Comply, submit, obey, capitulate” no actually, because they said the same things about the Gestapo and we know where that led. Go fuck yourself
This post is unavailable
upvote 31 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

“all you have to do is use the grok-powered genital compliance scanner before you’re allowed into the bathroom, wokie, it’s no big deal”

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

Don’t forget pedophiles! Can’t forget that!

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 9w

So you must support Jan 6ers who believed their liberty was being taken away from them in a stolen election?

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

There’s no evidence the election was stolen, which makes that a wholly irrelevant comparison, you twit.

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

They didn’t riot to make a change to the system that disenfranchised them. They rioted to block a democratic process because their leader lost fair and square. Those aren’t even remotely comparable. Yall will grasp at any straws in sight and it’s pathetic

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

What change did Renee Good try to make? She died not complying with the law because of a legal agency she found unjust. She took personal action. Right wingers will tell you ICE is just and there’s no evidence ICE is an illegitimate agency so you have no right not to comply.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

You either support all calls for action when you find something unjust or you don’t. You can’t willfully not understand why other people take arms against what they find unjust but you don’t, when you insist others understand why you take arms against what you find unjust but they don’t

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

ICE shot an unarmed man in broad daylight with no justification, and that doesn’t even narrow down which incident I’m talking about. I don’t give a single fuck what right wingers tell me, I look at the actual facts. ICE has repeatedly disobeyed court orders and that’s just the tip of the iceberg for their illegal actions. do better, bootlicker.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

why do you neglect to acknowledge that factual information exists?

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 9w

In what world do you think “ICE did something bad so the entire agency should be abolished” is a fact? It’s an opinion. Just like “weird things happened in some polling centers so the election results should be overturned” is an opinion. Both opinions are based in clear personal bias, not fact

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

except weird things demonstrably didn’t happen in polling centers. this has been legally adjudicated time and time again. ICE systematically disregards the judiciary. Those two are not comparable.

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 9w

“The judicial system decided you were wrong and absolutely nothing weird happened, therefore absolving the government that conducted the investigation from wrongdoing” “Also the judicial system is unjust and protects the government ruling class” Totally not coming from a place of personal bias

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

The 2020 Election has been verified through innumerable different methods. I turned to the courts because they are treated as dispositive finders of fact in many contexts. If you have a specific claim about the 2020 election, then raise it, or stop using it as nonspecific justification.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 9w

Like I said, it wasn’t stolen, but a leap is being made by those who say it is. From “weird things happened” to “stolen.” Just like the leap of “bad thing happens” to “systematically disregards the judiciary”

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

there’s not a leap because they systematically ignore court orders. (ik this is ai overview, I assure you it is true but i can get a proper source if you want)

post
upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

You do not have to support all calls to action 😭😭 “call to action to bring back slavery” I am NOT supporting that because someone thinks they have a right to own another person

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 9w

That’s missing my point. Back when slavery was a global norm, you could understand why people would push back on what they claimed to be their rightful property being stolen from them. In a modern lens, obviously owning people is wrong so we don’t see that as a righteous cause. Only point was that you can’t preach noncompliance with laws/issues you disagree with, and then criticize those who preach noncompliance with laws they disagree with.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

The problem with your argument is that while it superficially appears to be consistent, violent insurrection is fundamentally not the same thing as civil disobedience. One obeys the laws of democracy, while the other does not

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 9w

No I can’t actually, because of people like Thomas Day and Samuel Johnson who both disliked how Washington and Jefferson were “signing the Declaration of Independence with one hand and brandishing a whip with the other” people knew slavery was wrong back them. Stop with this “arrogance of Moderna” shit. It was wrong by their standards as well

upvote 3 downvote