Anonymous #1 3w

YES THIS EXACTLY

3

Anonymous OP 3w

We need to watch out for leftist grifters. I think they realize there’s an audience of desperate people rn

8

Anonymous #1 3w

nick fuentes is slightly leaning into it. obviously he doesn’t position himself as a leftist, but he’s clearly intelligent enough to lean into it occasionally (even with anti-semitic backings on the zionism issues) but yes, for sure. i mean dean withers isn’t exactly leftist leftist, but we had a mutual friend a few years back. dean is a grifter and i, looking at it from a logical standpoint and ignoring ethics, get it and understand that appeal

6

Anonymous #1 3w

No it doesn’t. Socialism is a step in a process of moving toward communism.

4

Anonymous #1 3w

Karl Marx, inventor of these concepts primarily, did not even distinguish between socialism and communism. They were effectively the same thing to him, just taking place at different points in a nations transition to the end state that is communism.

5

Anonymous #2 3w

massive massive oversimplification and misrepresentation of what socialism and communism are

6

Anonymous #2 3w

Doesn’t “socialist” imply you want socialism but no further transition towards communism?

6

Anonymous OP 3w

It’s literally exactly how Marx described it.

-1

Anonymous #1 3w

No, not really, even if they believe that to be the case. Because socialism can only really ever be a transition to communism. I self describe as a socialist, but I understand socialism is a stepping stone.

-1