Anonymous #1 1w

Is that really the most important takeaway here

9

Anonymous #3 1w

Yeah, the duke, not the fucking town crier

6

Anonymous #4 1w

Dude chill 😂 My point was a WORLD war was started by the actions of one

1

Anonymous #3 1w

The assassin was part of an organized serbian nationalist group it’s not even a similar situation

1

Anonymous #2 1w

I don’t think I can certainly say it was a single person who shot kirk and not a organized group. I don’t think I can certainly say all the details have come out. I don’t think all the details WILL come out, at least for a while. I can’t say I certainly believe the story. I can’t say I certainly trust. But I can certainly say that only one person pulled each trigger…

1

Anonymous #3 1w

An accurate comparison would be if antifa was an armed organization in the US receiving assistance from Canada that was assassinating political leaders, so the US declares war on Canada. You can’t justify calls for a civil war on WWI because this situation is in no way even close to similar

2

Anonymous #2 1w

It’s a very important point

1

Anonymous #3 1w

Sure, but I'm just saying there's a drastic difference- a countries political leader being assassinated by a nationalist group is very different than a Republican mouthpiece being assassinated. The latter is definitely not means to wage a war against an entire political party.

1

Anonymous #3 1w

That was the “direct precipitating event,” but there were a series of other factors. A group carried out the assassination and following it, an ultimatum was issued. Terms weren’t agreed. Then sides were drawn. But this is why we learn about history so we don’t repeat it.

1