Anonymous #1 11w

Yeah except republicans have no standards and that's how we end up with rapist criminals as president

6

Anonymous #2 11w

So? Your solution to that is to put a Leftist rapist criminal as president?

1

Anonymous #1 11w

What are you even talking about man 🫩

1

Anonymous #1 11w

You’re basically saying your own standards are basically under the ground. How can you say “so?” to the fact our president rapes ppl and then we go after our own if they rape ppl. You have literally no standards

0

Anonymous OP 11w

You’re moving the goalpost dude. “So” is because what does Trump being a rapist have to do with being upset about having to hold your candidates to your own standards?

1

Anonymous #1 11w

My point is that we're at a disadvantage when the other side would vote for fucking Hitler. It's a good thing to have standards but the reality is it's a political disadvantage if the other side doesn't hold their politicians accountable.

1

Anonymous #1 11w

Because you guys vote for literally anyone who has done literally anything if they toe the line. We don’t.

1

Anonymous #2 11w

If you believed your standards made for a better candidate it wouldn’t be a disadvantage. No one votes for Trump BECAUSE he’s a rapist, they just don’t care that he is. The fact that you’re frustrated that your candidate isn’t allowed to be a rapist is weird

1

Anonymous #1 11w

Not my argument at all don't put words in my mouth

1

Anonymous #1 11w

We’re frustrated that your candidates ARE allowed to be rapists. You even tried putting a proven kid diddler in charge of the dept of justice, and no one cared, he’d be in there now if Congress didn’t blow it up and he stepped out

1

Anonymous #2 11w

Cool that you think I am, but it’s OP’s point I’m responding to

1

Anonymous OP 11w

Not what you said bud. Plus you keep saying “you.” Just because I point out that what you say is stupid does not make me a rapist-defending republican. Resorting to ad hominem is something you should work on

1