Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
You do you OP, very respectable position, but personally? I don’t think an imaginary line on a map is enough to justify ANYthing close to the violence it’s historically been used to justify
I hate that opposing ICE somehow equates to opposing immigration enforcement
upvote 31 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

I work in a school where thirty nine different languages are spoken across the student body and the first thing you realize after figuring out how to communicate with everyone is that EVERY. SINGLE. KID. No matter where they came from or what language they speak - is willing to lie to you that their need to use the bathroom at ANY given moment is ALWAYS an emergency

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

As OP where did I say anything about justifying violence. You can justify immigration enforcement in 2026 without justifying the historic precedent that immigration enforcement has had.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Like - we really are the same and maybe that sucks sometimes but “cultural incompatibility” is complete and utter horseshit

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

“Enforcement,” to be frank. Because that implies state-sponsored violence.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

I don’t think enforcement implies state sponsored violence at all. There’s police officers in charge of traffic enforcement. As members of a state police force does that imply state sponsored violence?

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

I want you to describe to me - exactly, in specific terms - how ICE “non-violently” enforces someone’s illegal status by deporting them. Cause the way I see it? Even if it’s a completely compliant affair, where both the ICE officers and the detainee are doing exactly what they’re supposed to - ICE is still actively uprooting someone’s life that they’ve built and throwing them out to start over. I consider that violent. Why don’t you?

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Different angle: if someone ripped YOU away from everything you’d worked to build and stuck you halfway across the globe with nothing, would you consider it NON-violent?

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

I openly said I oppose ice in my post. Ice has only existed since 2003. Immigration enforcement existed before ice. What are you not understanding

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

So… how was it enforced before ICE? Again - I’m asking for specifics.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

And I don’t care about specifics right now. My post was just me stating I don’t like ICE but I support the concept of enforcing immigration law (as does like every other country on the planet).

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Too slow! I did the research for you. Prior to ICE, the “Immigration and Naturalization Service” existed. Or, INS. They deported people too. So AGAIN - if someone ripped you away from everything you’d worked to build and stuck you halfway across the globe….

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

(and again - their justification for DOING SO is an IMAGINARY LINE WE MADE UP.)

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

I was never going to research it 😭😭

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

I appreciate the honesty, while simultaneously realize you aren’t going to do any self reflection because of it

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

You’re going down this deep rabbit hole of theoreticals

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

No, I’m not. INS - and the deportations they committed - are not a hypothetical. I’m asking you to put yourself in someone else’s shoes. Someone else who LITERALLY, ACTUALLY, AND PROVABLY lived througu what I’m describing. Or, in simpler terms: I’m asking you to have a little fucking empathy.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

I hope tomorrow is a better day.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

And THEN - AFTER the empathy - I’m asking you to consider an extremely simple question. If it happened to you, would you consider it non-violent?

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

If I didn’t have empathy I wouldn’t oppose Ice

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Not what I asked If it happened to you - would you consider it non-violent?

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

I’m not going to keep responding to you. I’m not getting anything out of this conversation at all. I know what you’re trying to get it and I just don’t see anything productive coming out of this.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

I know you’re not getting anything from this. *You’re completely refusing to engage with the question.* So ONCE AGAIN - if someone ripped you away from everything you’d worked to build and stuck you halfway across the globe with NOTHING AT ALL - would you consider that to be non-violent?

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

🙏🏻🙏🏻

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

Silence and/or redirection is an answer too. Do you realize that? I do.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

I told you what I believe already. Cut your hyper fixation on this conversation and do something productive with your time like I’m about to.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

no that’s most definitely a thing cannibalism is a cultural thing in some tribes we don’t cohabitate with cannibals

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 3w

and yet the brown and black kids i’m basing this statement off of AREN’T cannibals. so why would you try and EQUATE my students to cannibalism?

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

and the worst part is? you were so close to confronting the fact your belief system is wrong, but you chose to ignore the evidence anyway

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

Whatever helps you sleep at night unc

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 3w

five hours of reply formulation just to end up with "unc." sad.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

I told you I had better things to be doing. It’s a Saturday. Not everyone is chronically online like you

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

I knew from the minute you started this get your point was and I just completely disagreed with it from a logic point of view. You can claim I’m not knowledgeable on it or whatever to make yourself feel better or whatever but I am. You made it really hard for someone to have a rational debate with you given your speaking from emotion.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

well i’m not. I wasn’t comparing anything i was just listing an example when culture can go too far i don’t know you’re students and i’m not in the business of badmouthing them sorry

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 3w

but like do you agree that cultural incompatibility is in fact a thing because of cannibalism?

upvote 1 downvote