“The US sunk an Iranian warship that *thought* it was safe in international waters”
No, they “thought” they were safe because they were an unarmed ship leaving a military event that India invited both Iran AND THE US to
The ship wasn’t unarmed it had 76 mm auto cannon, 20 and 40mm auto cannons, 4 SSMs(surface to surface missiles), 2 triple torpedo launchers and 4 SAMs
6
Anonymous3w
It seems like international law is clear on this. It’s a bit weird that they were still around 10-12 days after the event, but it’s shitty that they had no reason to even expect an attack
4
Anonymous3w
Source?
1
Anonymous#13w
Trump is don’t worry. Decades of international reputational damage in the span of 14 months
3
Anonymous#33w
Type “Iris Dena” into Google
1
Anonymous#23w
The quote is from Hegseth
1
Anonymous#23w
Sorry that was supposed to be directed to OP. But I shall read this🫡 appreciate it
1
Anonymousevil_sheep3w
Reports I saw say it had no munitions on board (the actual weapons platforms aren’t exactly removable) because of the event they were invited to. It’s possible they had weapons anyway, but again reports are suggesting otherwise
1
AnonymousOP3w
I’m thinking it did. You don’t really remove munitions just for joint training. You might put them in long storage on the ship and not in combat storage but usually it’s not fully removed from the ship
I may be wrong though