US Politics on Sidechat | “The US sunk an Iranian warship that *thought* it was safe in international waters” No, they “thought” they were safe because they were an unarmed ship leaving a military event that India invited both Iran AND THE US to

Sidechat

Download

Join communities on Sidechat Download

US Politics 35w

“The US sunk an Iranian warship that *thought* it was safe in international waters” No, they “thought” they were safe because they were an unarmed ship leaving a military event that India invited both Iran AND THE US to

Anonymous 35w

Someone needs to knock the US down a peg

Anonymous 35w

The ship wasn’t unarmed it had 76 mm auto cannon, 20 and 40mm auto cannons, 4 SSMs(surface to surface missiles), 2 triple torpedo launchers and 4 SAMs

Anonymous 35w

It seems like international law is clear on this. It’s a bit weird that they were still around 10-12 days after the event, but it’s shitty that they had no reason to even expect an attack

Anonymous 35w

Source?

Anonymous

#1 35w

Trump is don’t worry. Decades of international reputational damage in the span of 14 months

Anonymous

#3 35w

Type “Iris Dena” into Google

Anonymous

#2 35w

The quote is from Hegseth

Anonymous

#2 35w

Sorry that was supposed to be directed to OP. But I shall read this🫡 appreciate it

Anonymous

evil_sheep 35w

Reports I saw say it had no munitions on board (the actual weapons platforms aren’t exactly removable) because of the event they were invited to. It’s possible they had weapons anyway, but again reports are suggesting otherwise

Anonymous

OP 35w

I’m thinking it did. You don’t really remove munitions just for joint training. You might put them in long storage on the ship and not in combat storage but usually it’s not fully removed from the ship I may be wrong though