Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
It’s REALLY bad bruh
20 upvotes, 22 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "It’s REALLY bad bruh"
Aint no way
22 upvotes, 2 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in US Politics. "Aint no way"
upvote 20 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 5d

Young could mean 18

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5d

Ewwwww fuck off you creep

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5d

Learn laws

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5d

Larry Nasser infamously assaulted children, when monsters like this say young they don’t mean 18 or older

upvote 22 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5d

You know what they say about assumptions

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5d

Actually it was EPSTEIN who said in a letter to Nasser that they were young. So it’s actually worse

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5d

literally majority of the victims are underage and you’re going to pretend there is nuance here? why give a convict the benefit of the doubt?

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 5d

He has not been convicted of anything related to sexual crimes

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5d

Ah we are in the bargaining stage of denial now

upvote 16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5d

he… was found liable for the sexual abuse of E. Jean Carrol so… that is factually incorrect.

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 5d

That was a Mickey Mouse case

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5d

It is still a fact that Trump *has* been found liable for sexual crimes, so your prior statement was a complete falsehood. This is where you would concede to that fact in an ordinary good faith discussion, especially so on the rule of law.

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 5d

Nope. It don’t count

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5d

so by your logic, Charles Manson was an innocent man bc his convictions of murder don’t count if he & his crew thinks it was a Mickey Mouse case… correct?

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 5d

Except those were legit

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5d

okay so that’s legit bc he was guilty… so the case against OJ Simpson was a sham bc he was not guilty… but wait, Trump was found guilty of sexual abuse by a jury… wouldn’t that just follow your Manson case logic?

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5d

Hard drive. Now. 🫴

upvote 11 downvote
user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5d
post
upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5d

You guys are fuckin strange

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 5d

The far right has always been into this. They fetishize power for the sake of power. And this is the logical endpoint

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 5d

Like let’s even just assume they are magically talking about 18 yos, and how they now think a dude in his 70s groping teenagers is fucking normal

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 5d

It’s fucking disgusting and anyone trying to provide cover for it should be monitored for similar behavior.

upvote 4 downvote