Larry Nasser infamously assaulted children, when monsters like this say young they don’t mean 18 or older
22
Anonymous#25d
You know what they say about assumptions
-2
Anonymous#25d
Actually it was EPSTEIN who said in a letter to Nasser that they were young. So it’s actually worse
10
Anonymous#15d
literally majority of the victims are underage and you’re going to pretend there is nuance here? why give a convict the benefit of the doubt?
11
Anonymous#35d
He has not been convicted of anything related to sexual crimes
-3
Anonymous#15d
Ah we are in the bargaining stage of denial now
16
Anonymous#15d
he… was found liable for the sexual abuse of E. Jean Carrol so… that is factually incorrect.
9
Anonymous#35d
That was a Mickey Mouse case
-3
Anonymous#15d
It is still a fact that Trump *has* been found liable for sexual crimes, so your prior statement was a complete falsehood. This is where you would concede to that fact in an ordinary good faith discussion, especially so on the rule of law.
14
Anonymous#35d
Nope. It don’t count
-3
Anonymous#15d
so by your logic, Charles Manson was an innocent man bc his convictions of murder don’t count if he & his crew thinks it was a Mickey Mouse case… correct?
9
Anonymous#35d
Except those were legit
-3
Anonymous#15d
okay so that’s legit bc he was guilty… so the case against OJ Simpson was a sham bc he was not guilty…
but wait, Trump was found guilty of sexual abuse by a jury… wouldn’t that just follow your Manson case logic?
8
Anonymous#15d
Hard drive. Now. 🫴
11
Anonymous#15d
12
Anonymous#15d
You guys are fuckin strange
11
Anonymous#65d
The far right has always been into this. They fetishize power for the sake of power. And this is the logical endpoint
3
Anonymous#45d
Like let’s even just assume they are magically talking about 18 yos, and how they now think a dude in his 70s groping teenagers is fucking normal
13
Anonymous#65d
It’s fucking disgusting and anyone trying to provide cover for it should be monitored for similar behavior.