Anonymous #1 4w

preferably the ones who support the killing of innocent palestinian children face karmic justice (exactly proportional response to what they support) and the ones who don’t just chill

6

Anonymous OP 4w

and you determine who that is how

0

Anonymous #1 4w

The Israelis who live on land they developed that wasn’t arable or livable before should stay. That is one of the few things I admire them for

0

Anonymous #2 4w

and the ones who don’t, but were born there and didn’t support the oppression, but have no money to go elsewhere? what about them?

1

Anonymous #1 4w

#1, have you ever met an Israeli citizen that was willing to shut the fuck up for 2 seconds? No? That’s how you determine. Israeli genocide supporters are FAMOUSLY willing to be loud about it

4

Anonymous OP 4w

oh ok so ur whole argument is based on vibes. got it

-1

Anonymous #3 4w

We need to reach a settlement. All that military aid we gave the IDF can be used to help resettle Israelis either back in Europe or in communities alongside Palestinians where a peacekeeping force will stop communal violence

5

Anonymous #3 4w

It’s incredible how you interpreted that as “vibes” and not “multiple years of social media history and public statements”

1

Anonymous #2 4w

you’re using one tragedy - the founding of Israel - to justify another tragedy, posting ten million people from their homes, many of whom are children, many of whom are innocent. collective punishment is a war crime.

3

Anonymous #3 4w

ousting * not posting

1

Anonymous #3 4w

If they want to stay there they need to do right by the ppl who were ejected 70 years ago. Reparations, placement in universities, land rights etc

0

Anonymous #2 4w

who needs to do the Palestinians right in ur eyes? just the Israelis who were alive 70 years ago? or every civilian of Israel? does the 19-year-old whose never left tel aviv need to spend the next twenty years paying her share $5000 due to the next gov’t of palestine? how will this work? literally all yall do is speak vibes w/ no realistic thought

0

Anonymous #3 4w

Yes. Literally, objectively, yes. She does need to pay her $5000 share. Because even though she never PARTICIPATED in the direct exploitation, her life is DIRECTLY POSSIBLE BECAUSE OF IT. Is this a hard concept to understand?????

1

Anonymous #3 4w

Or rather - is it an UNCOMFORTABLE concept to understand? As someone who lives in America, as a non-native-American? I know the answer. Do you?

1

Anonymous OP 4w

Ur assertion that benefit alone creates personal liability is wrong, unsound & straight up perilous because moral and legal culpability require agency — intent, participation, control — rather than just inheriting the circumstances. Attributing individual debt for historical wrongs is punishment innocents who have done nothing to deserve punishing. You are arguing for the collective punishment of an entire group of people. You’re no better than the Israeli oppressors.

0

Anonymous OP 4w

Yeah, it is pretty uncomfortable, #3. I learned our history here in the U.S.; I learned when our government taxed Black Americans more for just being Black; I learned when our government detained Japanese civilians for just being Japanese. I consider collective punishment to be horrible. I’m surprised you don’t.

0

Anonymous #3 4w

OP* not #3

0

Anonymous #1 4w

By asking

1