Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
How is this not blatantly unconstitutional?
link

Texas makes Bible passages required reading for millions of public school students

www.theguardian.com

upvote 21 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 19w

It is, they just don’t care

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 19w

christians nationalists don't think laws or precedents should apply to them

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 19w

It will probably get ruled unconstitutional by a judge

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 19w

No one’s forcing you to believe it lol

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 19w

"indoctrination is ok when we do it"

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 19w

So studying a religious text, which btw was one important to the culture of the founding peoples of the country is indoctrination?

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 19w

Yeah actually. Do you know what kind of hell would be raised if the Quran became required reading for public schools. Not being forced to study a certain religion is literally the whole point even if nobody’s forced to ‘believe it’ lmfaoo

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 19w

So make it required by law to read excerpts from the Torah and Quran. If thats the defense you're trying to use.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 19w

You could do that in certain states. Good luck though, might be hard to find reasonable context outside of the world religions class.

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 19w

I think you're missing the point. And not understanding how malleable the minds are of children.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 19w

Yes they are malleable. They can absorb lots of information, that’s why we teach young

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 19w

the founding peoples of the country who explicitly defined separation of church and state. the founding peoples who were not all christian and those that were were not the same type. what bible should we be teaching then if it was a part of their “culture,” should we tell the children that they started their days with beer and were a bunch of drunk young men? if we’re having the kids literally read the bible for it then we should also let the kids drink the beer as it was a part of the culture.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 19w

You’re conflating learning about a culture and participating in it. Also, as far as I’m concerned, the separation of church and state in the constitutional sense applies exclusively to federal government.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 19w

Virtually all them were. They started their days with Alcohol then because they didnt have clean fucking water

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 19w

It does.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 19w

you are too. reading the bible since it was their culture. instead of simply stating that christianity was their beliefs

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 19w

that is not why they drank alcohol girl do some research

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 19w

I literally don’t care why they drank alcohol.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 19w

I mean I suppose you can do it like that if you want absolutely no substance at all in a subject. What if for WW1 I just said it was “a big war with a lot of trenches”.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 19w

Well it was but world war 1 was started by the Austro-Hungarian empire because s bunch of Serbian military officers calling themselves the black hand decided they were going to kill the crown prince which set in motion a chain of events that led to the war. The assassination was actually 112 years ago tomorrow. The existing alliances turned into a global war when they failed to stop it from spiraling out of control.

upvote 1 downvote