
A powerful executive in a presidential system could also be seen as a mix of those two ideas but that we have also seen can go downhill very fast. The problem is that people who aren’t truly benevolent will attempt to get into power, and if you give the state too much power they will misuse it. And even if we had a theoretically benevolent dictator, they can’t know everything and would be manipulated by those around them.
The balancing act is that democracy limits the power of the government to keep it from being abused, but that limits the government from taking actions which may be necessary but unpopular. But when you give more power to the government with less of a democratic safeguard, that then enables abuses because people are flawed.
We have seen that happen with our own Supreme Court, for example. It was made with the intent that the people aren’t informed enough to choose good justices. But that has caused there to be corrupt unaccountable justices. An example of where this can be good would be with like NOAA or the FWS where people are SUPPOSED to be employed there because they are experts and make the decisions necessary with their expertise. But that’s all gotten fucked lately with DOGE cuts and bad appointments.