Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
If not for colonialism, Africa would be one of the best continents and the DRC specifically would be one of the top.
upvote 12 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 11w

Why’d #1 delete his comment lmao I thought it was funny

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 11w

I am anti-colonial but I think it’s hard to truly picture a world without colonialism given that the Industrial Revolution was spurred on by colonialism.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 11w

Be a lot better for many non-Eurocentric nations.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 11w

Like without colonialism happening how long would industrialization even take to occur?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11w

I feel like it’d be better in some ways but worse in others. Africa wouldn’t have been set back by colonial depopulation and the world would be more multipolar, Africa would be more competitive with Europe and the Arab world. But you also have the aspect where industrialization and the associated healthcare advancements would take longer to occur. So like there’d be upsides and downsides. Africa would be more competitive but in an alternate 2026 would probably be at a lower level of development.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 11w

I wouldn’t say healthcare developments would slow, I’d say these advances would just be more spread out throughout the world. If it weren’t for slavery or colonialism, we’d be far better off. The person deemed the “father of gynecology” probably wouldn’t have been the horrible man we know today who’d defile black living bodies but could have been a black man or a native.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11w

The rapid technological development we saw with the Industrial Revolution was a product of English colonial hegemony. The English accumulated wealth in their colonial metropole, then invested in machines to turn American slavery cotton into textiles to sell to their colony in India. The world has been progressing at a slow pace for thousands of years. But technology exploded in the last 200.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 11w

The reality is that without colonialism, the world would be more multipolar. That carries obvious benefits. But it wasn’t destined that the Industrial Revolution would happen when it did. It only happened because of a specific set of circumstances in Europe right then. The Congo has been progressing at its own pace for thousands of years. That would have kept happening, but it wouldn’t industrialize suddenly without a catalyst.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 11w

I think that without European colonial dominance it would have happened eventually. China, Japan, the arab world, and a number of states in west and east Africa all had their own intellectual traditions. But I do think conquest would have happened either way too. Europe didn’t invent it. With better technology would have come more advanced war no matter what.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Deleted 11w

Comment Deleted

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 11w

Colonization apologist try not to be uninformed about history challenge: level - impossible

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 11w

That comment wasn’t even reportable lmao

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 11w

Misinformation is reportable but your comment can also be taken down if it gets too many downvotes i believe.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11w

It had 5 downvotes You’re right that it was misinformation though

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 11w

Yeah 5 or more I believe gets it taken down.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11w

No, it’s -25

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 11w

This is not apologism for colonial atrocities. That shit was never justified. I just think we have to be realistic about what caused the Industrial Revolution to occur when it did. There’s no universal timer that says “it happens in 1800.” The Industrial Revolution was an aberration in the normally slow, methodical progression of technological advancement.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 11w

It wouldn’t have been as bad as it was. America would’ve still belonged to the Natives. Britain didnt invent it true, but they were the ones who excelled the most. At one point the British empire spanned 25% of the world. I’d rather have a delay in the Industrial Revolution than what we see today.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11w

I think that’s a respectable belief to have! You can certainly think that a more multipolar world with less colonial atrocities is worth it even if it means the Industrial Revolution is delayed. I just want to make sure that delay is acknowledged.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 11w

I also want to say that anyone trying to justify historical atrocities with “look where we are today” is a piece of shit, particularly because the people committing those atrocities had no noble goals they were just exploitative monsters. I myself am very into the history of non-European civilizations and I just wanted to make it clear what them continuing to progress at their own pace would look like.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11w

It def used to be 5, it still might be on your schools yak

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 11w

#1 is that weirdo that keeps reposting my original post on colonialism attempting to defend it.

upvote 1 downvote