Sidechat logo
Download TikTok Instagram X
Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
US Politics icon
US Politics 2w
Embryos are not human beings
comment

25
upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Pro-choicers always making the dumbest unscientific claims šŸ˜‚

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

What are they?

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Whatā€™s your ethical standard of when personhood begins?

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

At what point does it magically become a human being, then? Is it a praying mantis? An eagle? What else would it be other than a human? Please, enlighten me.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

you need test accommodations if you think this is a human being

post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

Go ahead and look up the scientific definition of a human being

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

Scientifically, a human being is defined as a member of the genus Homo, specifically the species Homo sapiens (Latin for "wise man" or "thinking man"). Here's the first result.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

Honey AI pops up for everyone. Just bc it pops up doesnā€™t mean itā€™s accurate.

post
upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

Human beings are fully developed.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

How exactly does this definition rule out embryos grim being human persons?

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

Are children fully developed?

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

I didnā€™t say human persons!

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

An individual organism of the species Homo sapiens

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

And every ā€œpro-lifeā€ individual Iā€™ve seen always condolences straight up murder by cops!

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

A human being is independent of anything else. It is a developed being that is not attached to anything else you ignorant bitch.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

Untrue and irrelevant to this conversation šŸ„±

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

Itā€™s my conversation you ugly hoe

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

I didnā€™t say it wasnā€™t human you dumb ass

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

ā€œEmbryos are not human beings.ā€ - quite literally you

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

A human being is a fully developed independent organismā€¦ Iā€™m saying itā€™s not fully developed dumbass

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

would you say that your skin cells are human beings too? lmao no because that sounds genuinely fucking stupid.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

human being noun : an individual of the species of primate mammal that walks on two feet : a person -Merriam Webster Synonyms: person, life, creature, thing, etc. You said they arenā€™t human beings. You didnā€™t say they arenā€™t fully developed. Donā€™t embarrass yourself.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

ā€œan individualā€

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

also, you can refer it to the definition I already posted in chat dumbass šŸ’‹ maybe you should take your own advice about not embarrassing yourself!

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Is a newborn baby independent? Is it a human being?

upvote 1 downvote