Anonymous #2 9w

Based on the evidence and her testimony and her lawyer

0

Anonymous #2 9w

Well that part is just the fact of the matter, the opinion issue is whether or not she is criminally responsible. We all know she did that shit, it’s a “why” debate at this point

10

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 9w

She belongs in either a mental institution or in prison, Its weird people think otherwise

1

Anonymous #2 9w

Yeah man, the two sides are mostly arguing about which of those places she needs to be sent to

10

“women” and youre talking about people who make money off of you getting this worked up over it and then using it to make generalizations of the female gender. Get a fuckin grip

-2

Anonymous justinian 9w

you literally admitted to how the patriarchy had a role in this. she had a mental health issue, the patriarchy upholds that mental health isn’t a priority. Sure some people have a been abit extreme about it, but yeah the society is at fault for these kind of cases.

-3

Anonymous #4 9w

Oh it definitely had a role in how women’s mental health issues are understudied. But she didn’t kill her kids directly because she was directly upset about sexism or something.

-1

Comment Deleted

0

I’ve also seen that, along with a 4th side who are calling the husband a coward/a cuck/whatever insult you want, because the husband testified that he’s forgiven her and views her as sick, not evil.

4

Comment Deleted

0

Me

0

Comment Deleted

0

I’ve seen men who agree with her insanity defense, but not men in the “she did nothing wrong” camp.

10

Can you give me an argument why we shouldn't let clearly bad genes die off?

0

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

I am pro killing children that do not benefit society as a whole

0

Comment Deleted

0

Sure we might lose a few Picassos but we'll kill a lot more future dregs on the systems. In the long run it works

1

Anonymous #7 9w

satire

1

Anonymous #8 9w

You are unable to think bigger picture you idiot

0

Anonymous #7 9w

there is no bigger picture my mom didn’t kill me or my sister bc of post partum depression.

1

Anonymous #7 9w

Who cares if some Psycho kills some mutts. Would you rather that psycho raise those children to be little degens? No! It's natural selection we kill the weak to preserve society

-1

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

You'd hate my opinions on single mothers then lmao

-1

Anonymous #7 9w

You have to crack a few eggs to make an omelette and to have a great society I'm sorry but we need to kill some kids

-1

Comment Deleted

0

Oh sorry we're not allowed society because it makes people uncomfortable

-3

Anonymous #7 9w

Give me an non emotional reason why when looking at pure public good we shouldn't allow people who will cause societal harm to get rid of themselves

-2

what does that have to do with anything they said😭

1

Anonymous #8 9w

you mean people who get paid by you rage watching them?

-3

again, misogyny had a role in that. she’s gonna be put into a hospital anyway, the next time you see anything about it it’s gonna be your wife.

-1

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

It's not genetics. Statistically speaking if you have a psycho parent you would be more socially maladjusted. The best way to end cycles of abuse and the proliferation of antisocial behaviour is to let the natural course take hold and let them kill their children

-1

Comment Deleted

0

Comment Deleted

0

I'm ok with 5% of children dying if it means less criminals and degenerates

0

Comment Deleted

0

Because I think my genes are good? What kinda question is that? If my mother wanted to kill me then shit I wouldn't be able to stop her

2

Comment Deleted

0

I'm having an intellectual discussion and you cannot seem to get over base emotion

1

Anonymous #7 9w

Like women kill their kids all the time and we allow it. That's what SIDS is! I'm just saying we cut the bs and say what we're already doing!

1

Anonymous #4 9w

i don’t rage lmfao i have a good life and know the media wants men and women to be divisive so there’s less children in the world

0

Anonymous #7 9w

men kill their whole families all the time lmfao

5

Anonymous #8 9w

What makes you think I don't support that?

0

Anonymous #8 9w

Someone was talking on how “women are like Lindsay Clancy” and I responded that the vast majority of Family Annihilators are dudes and they never got back to me

8

Comment Deleted

0

You don't understand I'm not pro men or pro women I'm pro killing children

-1

Anonymous #7 9w

I cannot be more clear

-1

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 9w

Women are usually more open with their repressed homicidal desires. Thats why they post. Men bottle it up until they eventually kill everyone. You'll see more women talk about it even if more men kill for that reason

-1

You seem incredibly mad about this for some reason. I bet 10 bucks that you'll eventually kill your children

-1

Comment Deleted

0

A hit dog will hollar

0

I bet you’re a lovely guy, don’t worry reality will catch up w/ you

2

Anonymous #7 9w

11/10 Rage bait my guy

3

Anonymous #8 9w

Yeah, keep coping psycho

1

omg you’re a psycho. Your life is miserable I can tell

1

Anonymous #4 9w

Yeah I guarantee he'll be a family annihilator when he gets older

5