Anonymous #1 13w

Have you seen Top Gun maverick? It’s basically the same plot as A New Hope. They’re pretty much interchangeable in this case.

-1

Anonymous #2 13w

Is this supposed to mean anything to me?

1

Anonymous OP 13w

Not if you can’t read.

4

Anonymous OP 13w

You know Top Gun Maverick isn’t a Star Wars film, right?

0

Anonymous #1 13w

Have you seen Top Gun Maverick? You can’t really tell the difference.

1

Anonymous #2 13w

Are you trying to say you still think that Iran wasn’t trying to build nuclear bombs! That argument was dead in the water like 4 days ago, where have you been? 😂

-1

Anonymous OP 13w

Evidently you can’t, for sure.

0

Anonymous OP 13w

Source: Trust orange man

1

Anonymous OP 13w

Why do you think that?

-1

Anonymous #1 13w

Source: The IAEA saying Iran had enough uranium enriched to 60% to build 9-10 nuclear bombs 🫢

0

Anonymous #1 13w

Buddy it’s a joke, are you actually silly?

0

Anonymous OP 13w

It isn’t a joke. Jokes are funny.

0

Anonymous OP 13w

So you don’t believe our Director of National Intelligence that Donaldo appointed himself? That tracks.

2

Anonymous #2 13w

Buddy she said that back in March, it’s June now. Things change and adults are able to recognize that you have to keep up with the fact as we learn more. Also for the record I would tend to believe the IAEA over Tulsi, yes. I better not catch you spouting anymore “Iran wasn’t building a nuke” shit anymore either. Consider yourself educated 🧑‍🎓⭐️

0

Anonymous #1 13w

Hey make sure you don’t conveniently ignore the other comment chain where you learned that Iran was in fact building nuclear bombs, that’s called being ignorant.

-1

Anonymous OP 13w

I feel like i lost more brain cells talking to you about this than a SBS child. Maybe you should figure out what’s real and not. Or don’t. Idc what you do. You clearly don’t.

3

Anonymous OP 13w

I don’t think you know what happened when the US pulled out of the JCPOA and why it nullified the agreements. But that’s ok. You’ll learn.

3

Anonymous #2 13w

Oh ok so you are accepting that Iran was trying to build nukes but you’re converting to the “Why shouldn’t Iran be able to have nukes 😡” argument instead. Well at least you have the capacity to change your mind when presented with new information 🥳

-1

Anonymous OP 13w

Nope. They weren’t. But thanks for playing!

1

Anonymous #2 13w

Bro you’ve really gotta get rid of that screenshot it doesn’t mean anything to anyone that knows anything 😂

0

Anonymous OP 13w

Just because you can’t read doesn’t mean it’s not real

-1

Anonymous #2 13w

Do you understand that that just isn’t a valid view point anymore? Like it’s just actually not up for debate we know 100% that they were enriching uranium to almost weapons grade and had enough of enough to make 9-10 nuclear bombs.

0

Anonymous OP 13w

Except they weren’t and they didn’t. But you’re definitely on the national intelligence committee so you would know.

1

Anonymous OP 13w

You mean like our President ignored intelligence that they weren’t, in fact, making nuclear weapons?

2

Anonymous OP 13w

I have enough milk to make 40 cakes. That doesn’t mean I’m making 40 cakes.

0

Anonymous #2 13w

Oh cool credentialism now too. You just have an entire playbook of logical fallacies lol. Your only source that you’re basing your entire argument on is an article quoting Tulsi from three months ago before the conflict really got underway. You’d rather believe Tulsi, the recently appointed head of the NIA, rather than the IAEA, who operates under the UN with the cooperation of every Western nation on earth, whose entire job it is to monitor nuclear energy?

-1

Anonymous #1 13w

Uranium needs to be enriched to 3-20% purity for nuclear reactors. Past that there is no utility for higher purities. They were enriching it to TRIPLE that purity. Why do you think that is?

-1

Anonymous OP 13w

There’s zero proof of them enriching anything. Because they weren’t. But keep going.

3

Anonymous #1 13w

Whataboutism lol. I’m not a Trump support, that doesn’t hurt my feelings😂, I just like to be informed. Just read what I’m saying please stop letting your denseness prevent you from being learning something.

-1

Anonymous #2 13w

Ffs make one google search please. “Was Iran enriching uranium to 60%”. Do that and let me know what you come up with before you embarrass yourself further.

-1

Anonymous OP 13w

👌🏾I have. And you’re literally missing everything about the fact that the agreement is nullified. And the part that they weren’t working towards nuclear weapons. Please stop disguising racism as patriotism. Get educated

3

Anonymous OP 13w

I don’t think you know what whataboutism is. This is literally the same topic.

1

Anonymous #2 13w

There’s something in your brain that isn’t connecting and I don’t know how to help you. The facts are: Iran was enriching uranium to near-weapons grade, triple the purity needed for nuclear reactors. The IAEA knows this, it is a fact that you can’t argue because that’s how facts work. Your Tulsi thing is irrelevant, see my screenshot below from the bbc with the most recent word from Tulsi. Also Iran signed the NPT. Also the JCPOA also still exists you know.

-1

Anonymous #1 13w

“What about Trump ignoring intelligence 👶“ as a means of not acknowledging what I said. I honestly can’t tell if you guys are trolling ran

-1

Anonymous OP 13w

You forgot the fact that Trump told her she was wrong which is the only reason she changed her statement. Even though she was under oath. I guarantee you also don’t know how enrichment works and that even if they WERE doing that (they weren’t/arent) it would take more than 3 months to get to the levels you think they were striving for. But again, I’m sure you’re knowledge on all of these facts.

3

Anonymous OP 13w

I’m acknowledging the intelligence that contradicts yours, dumbass.

0

Anonymous #2 13w

Do you understand that 3 months is not a long time? Also how fucking dense can you be? What do you need to be presented with to understand that they were enriching uranium to weapons-grade purity? I don’t know what could possibly get through to you at this point. Also, I’m not a nuclear physicist and I don’t claim to be. Believe it or not, you don’t need to be to form an informed opinion. It takes one google search to find out what purity uranium you need for a bomb 😊

1

Anonymous #1 13w

Old, outdated intelligence. You’re the kind of guy to think the earth is flat because scientists thought that X number of years ago. It’s ok to change your opinion when presented with facts 😊

-1

Anonymous OP 13w

Take your own advice, iPad kid.

0

Anonymous #1 13w

Hope you get smarter someday. I think this app is only for college students so boy oh boy if you can’t then your college should give you a full refund 😂

-5

Anonymous OP 13w

Ironic.

0