
Thank you for your conversation. I will leave you with one more prompt, the things that happened to the victims of Epstein were the most obhorent violation of human rights. If our nation cannot unite even against that due to political difference, how will it ever make progress in other areas? Maybe sometime sacrifices have to made now to see progress even if it means working with those who fundamentally thing and value differently.
yes, I do believe that. If the average American valued child or human life, they would be more vocal on the Epstein files. They would be more vocal on the genocide in Palestine, they would be more vocal supporting systems and programs in the United States that would support human life. The average American doesn't care about something unless it affects them and unfortunately child rape just doesn't affect them so they don't care.
I said that nowhere by the way, I said that your politics reflect your morals. for example, if you don't believe that rape is that big of a deal you tend to support Trump despite the way he talks about women and the allegations against him. That's a difference in morals. People's stance on ice and what they're doing. That's a difference in morals and their politics reflect that. someone's stance on gay people. Their politics will reflect the morals they hold
if those differences were not as significant as they are, sure. However, I can't just ignore our differences when the differences include thinking i'm less of a person or don't deserve rights because i'm transgender. it is a difference in morals and a lot of people don't want to put aside their morals, their key values.
I'm not saying or suggesting you put those values away. Rather, I'm asking if for the sake of justice and simply doing what's right could we accept that there are people that disagree with our fundamental values and instead of focusing on these differences we put our efforts into thing that both sides value.
i'm not gonna lie I'm not really interested in keeping the conversation up, but I will say that I cannot and will not work with people who are against my existence as a concept. I cannot work with people who constantly work to keep me in my community in danger. I cannot work with people who do the same to other marginalized communities. Human rights are too big of a thing to just be something you agreed to disagree on and come back to later.
Which I personally believe is the intended effect of releasing the files in the first place. They want people to be demoralized and realize that these crimes will continue to happen wether the public is outraged or not. They want people to know that they’re powerless. We’re not; we just need to organize properly and that’s the tricky part
I think the factor that is largely missing is the acknowledgment that this is larger than a political issue. There are individuals on BOTH sides of the political parties that are involved in this and in covering it up. And until that is discussed or understood I fear people are going to continue to turn this into an “us against them” situation.
I’m not really sure what you mean tbh. It is at its foundation a political issue. Decades of lenient criminal justice policies led to unaccountability for the rich and powerful in this country. MAGA extremism led to tampering and dishonest investigations into the crimes detailed in the files. Citizens United allowed businesses and their ceos to buy favors and hide their crimes if they paid enough.
It unfortunately is an us against them situation. Us (the people) against the unaccountable ruling class. Within that class there are two parties and one is slightly more interested in justice than the other, although both are happy to support the status quo. I’m not interested in acting like the right and left are equally guilty here though, there’s really no evidence to support that
Have you seen that play out in the federal government? If you look at all the attempts to prevent these documents being released, all the lies told about them, all the failures to investigate people featured most prominently, you find that the perpetrators are equally Republican and democratic?
Well I mean yes of course we can unite under the belief that child sex abuse is wrong, thats not really a high threshold. My point is that the solution probably requires understanding the cause of the problem as well as we possibly can. To that end we should find out who the worst and most guilty abusers are
I’d disagree on that, I think we know quite well which party is more interested in justice for victims of sex crimes like this. For starters the maga party controls the entire federal government right now which is currently trying to put an abrupt end to the investigation despite not obtaining any sort of justice for the victims or having interviewed trump a single time despite his name being featured prominently in the document. He is accused of rape and it was dismissed out of hand.
I mean they’ve been partially released and trump is featured prominently in them. He’s also a convicted rapist for all intents and purposes which makes me more inclined to think he’d likely be unbothered by pedophilia too. The most that any democrat has going against them is that they were friends with Epstein, which is also true for hundreds of other people who haven’t committed any crimes.
That being said I get your point, releasing the full files should be the focus, not partisan finger pointing. I just want to push back on the “both sides bad” thing a bit because 1. It is one side that is most clearly obstructing justice at this moment and 2. It is the same side that more often defends sex criminals in the first place.
Don't give up, keep fighting, and most importantly don't let our government divide us in hate so they can get away with this. Because I truly believe that the majority of people are good people, albeit flawed in many different ways and with different beliefs and we are fundamentally stronger united