
Easy, there’s lots of different types of Marxism and most of them didn’t end up in charge of a country. Broadly there’s just Maoism and Marxism-Leninism that became state ideologies, while other Marxist and Marxist-adjacent ideologies like Luxembourgism, various sorts of anarchism, etc, all define themselves in opposition to the authoritarian Marxism of the USSR and China
Not require educated enough to call myself a Marxist, but Lenin made a compelling argument regarding the state and revolution regarding the class system and the way the owning classes uses the legal system as a tool for keeping their own stability, while running through the logistics of a working class person doing the same
The USSR never followed Marxism, it was Lenin, then Stalin. North Korea isn’t a traditional communist country. You’re thinking of china—which had Mao. Lenin and Mao were inspired by Marx, Stalin was just a psycho. Mao had a better run, but all current examples of “communism” in practice wasn’t true communism, the reason these governments failed/had problems was bc the countries were going through economic hardship and then bc of poor leadership got worse
That’s my personal issue with communism. The principles seem great in theory, but would require a greedless utopia to pull off on a large scale. I just don’t think it’s feasible or possible. It’s just like how ideal capitalism never would’ve gotten this bad- but the ideology incentivizes excessive monetization and wealth disparity, something we can see clearly now as we live in it.