
All some of you people ever do is talk about voting. Did we win civil rights by voting? Or the 40 hour work week? Even the New Deal which probably seems like this amazing example of what electoral politics can do was brought about by widespread and organized pressure from normal, working class people.
My point is we spend hours and hours and hours talking about voting for politicians already bought out by lobbyists when we should be talking about organizing a movement of working class people. If you guys are aware of any organizations in your area (not dems!) that are working against ICE or any of the issues we are facing you should think about getting involved with em
My issue with comments like yours is that it puts forward this idea that anytime someone is talking about voting that itâs a waste of time. Thereâs always someone who has to jump in here and misrepresent calls to vote as if we think voting is the most important thing. Essentially no one here thinks that. Itâd be like if we were talking about getting a car running and I brought up alignment and you go âno! We should only talk about brakes and throttle! Talking about alignments are a waste of
Time!â Like obviously we need to talk about brakes and throttle too but itâs a whole system of things that need to work, sometimes you do need to talk about the alignment. People should be allowed to talk about the utility of voting without constantly being attacked and having their argument misrepresented
Iâm sorry but if weâre realistic about the minuscule amount of organizing in America compared to the (unfortunately not common enough!) practice of voting then we gotta shift the conversation over to organizing. I get what youâre saying but like look where voting has gotten us. A vote is such an isolated political act and the equation of voting to politics has led so many people to be defeatist about the state of the world rn
I think youâre missing my point. People can discuss multiple ideas and can shift their attention from one idea to another from one conversation to the next. I donât know where this dynamic came from where we have to choose one or the other. Both concepts are important and have time and energy devoted to them
Yeah I guess but if people think organizing is crucial for change they donât act like it, at least not in America. Voting is quite obviously not going to fundamentally change anything in our country. Only widespread organizing can do that. So vote! But more importantly, organize!
I think there is a difference, but also letâs stop pretending that said candidates are out here voting for everyone to go get ice cream lol. People have plenty of valid reasons to be hesitant about voting for some dems. In particular dems who clearly have no spine or genuinely held beliefs
Thatâs my issue with your rhetoric though, you are putting the onus on the poster to address something you are assuming they donât know. I donât expect my mechanic to say âhey first of all let it be known that I do care about your brakes, but with that being said hereâs whatâs going on with your alignmentâ I just let them make the point about the alignment and if something else about their comments gives me the indication that they neglected brakes Iâll say something about it then
I mean people have reasons to dislike democrats, to resent and despise them for the reality that they are so spineless and yet the better of the two. But reasons to not vote for them? Absolutely not. Itâs just a trolley problem. Nobody gets ice cream and on one track 100 people die and on the other 90 people die. We can sit around and talk about how bad both tracks are all day long but ultimately why would you ever refuse to pull the lever? Do those 10 people that could be saved not matter?
I mean the difference is that the dems rn are just giving up on so many issues theyâve run on. Remember when Kamala said that she would âfollow the lawâ in regards to laws attacking trans people? Or how about when Clinton went to Michigan to talk down to Muslim voters who wanted an end to the ongoing genocide the US is funding? Itâs not dems going âoh we will only have ninety people killedâ but rather âoh we lost, maybe we can sacrifice 91 people to appeal to the median voterâ
Those things are all horrible and I wholeheartedly agree. They matter as a problem but not in the context of a decision between two fixed options. What youâre doing here is fixating on how horrible it is that people are tied to trolley tracks. Of course thatâs terrible, we need systemic change to prevent people being on the tracks in the first place. But voting is the switch and all that can do is choose between two bad outcomes. No matter how bad the blue one is, it is better than the red one