Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
"no I don't want to vote for harm reduction I just want a picture perfect leftist candidate that will do all the change I want at once"
3 upvotes, 25 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in US Politics. ""no I don't want to vote for harm reduction I just want a picture perfect leftist candidate that will do all the change I want at once""
upvote 3 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 17h

Gaslighters incoming 😔

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 16h

The option they want you to vote for: “ummm well in the tradition of bipartisanship, we will allow you to drive the car off of a smaller cliff”

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 17h

All some of you people ever do is talk about voting. Did we win civil rights by voting? Or the 40 hour work week? Even the New Deal which probably seems like this amazing example of what electoral politics can do was brought about by widespread and organized pressure from normal, working class people.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 17h

Obviously you should vote because it takes like an hour out of your year, but some of you guys act like that 1 single hour out of the nearly 9000 hours in a year is the most important political act.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 17h

Working class people who also voted lol

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 17h

Yall always do this I stg. Nobody is saying voting is the end all be all. It’s important among other things, nothing about this post disagrees with that

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 17h

Did I say don’t vote?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 17h

My point is we spend hours and hours and hours talking about voting for politicians already bought out by lobbyists when we should be talking about organizing a movement of working class people. If you guys are aware of any organizations in your area (not dems!) that are working against ICE or any of the issues we are facing you should think about getting involved with em

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 17h

My issue with comments like yours is that it puts forward this idea that anytime someone is talking about voting that it’s a waste of time. There’s always someone who has to jump in here and misrepresent calls to vote as if we think voting is the most important thing. Essentially no one here thinks that. It’d be like if we were talking about getting a car running and I brought up alignment and you go “no! We should only talk about brakes and throttle! Talking about alignments are a waste of

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 17h

Time!” Like obviously we need to talk about brakes and throttle too but it’s a whole system of things that need to work, sometimes you do need to talk about the alignment. People should be allowed to talk about the utility of voting without constantly being attacked and having their argument misrepresented

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16h

I’m sorry but if we’re realistic about the minuscule amount of organizing in America compared to the (unfortunately not common enough!) practice of voting then we gotta shift the conversation over to organizing. I get what you’re saying but like look where voting has gotten us. A vote is such an isolated political act and the equation of voting to politics has led so many people to be defeatist about the state of the world rn

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 16h

I think you’re missing my point. People can discuss multiple ideas and can shift their attention from one idea to another from one conversation to the next. I don’t know where this dynamic came from where we have to choose one or the other. Both concepts are important and have time and energy devoted to them

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16h

Because the whole point of the post was just saying “don’t be a moron and abstain when voting could help reduce suffering”. Nothing about that goes against the idea that organizing is crucial for change

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 16h

you left it out lol

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 16h

Would you not take a greater chance at survival as opposed to a worse one? Unless you think candidates like trump and Kamala are exactly identical then you know very well which is less harmful, even if they’re both bad

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16h

Yeah I guess but if people think organizing is crucial for change they don’t act like it, at least not in America. Voting is quite obviously not going to fundamentally change anything in our country. Only widespread organizing can do that. So vote! But more importantly, organize!

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16h

I think there is a difference, but also let’s stop pretending that said candidates are out here voting for everyone to go get ice cream lol. People have plenty of valid reasons to be hesitant about voting for some dems. In particular dems who clearly have no spine or genuinely held beliefs

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 16h

That’s my issue with your rhetoric though, you are putting the onus on the poster to address something you are assuming they don’t know. I don’t expect my mechanic to say “hey first of all let it be known that I do care about your brakes, but with that being said here’s what’s going on with your alignment” I just let them make the point about the alignment and if something else about their comments gives me the indication that they neglected brakes I’ll say something about it then

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 16h

More succinctly put; don’t assume a discussion about voting is making any greater claims about voting being the end all be all. It usually isn’t and is an important thing nonetheless

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 15h

Yeah my fault

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 15h

I mean people have reasons to dislike democrats, to resent and despise them for the reality that they are so spineless and yet the better of the two. But reasons to not vote for them? Absolutely not. It’s just a trolley problem. Nobody gets ice cream and on one track 100 people die and on the other 90 people die. We can sit around and talk about how bad both tracks are all day long but ultimately why would you ever refuse to pull the lever? Do those 10 people that could be saved not matter?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 15h

Ur good, its so common that I’ve become irritated about it but its just one of those semantic things that happens all the time, nothing too major 🙏

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 14h

I mean the difference is that the dems rn are just giving up on so many issues they’ve run on. Remember when Kamala said that she would “follow the law” in regards to laws attacking trans people? Or how about when Clinton went to Michigan to talk down to Muslim voters who wanted an end to the ongoing genocide the US is funding? It’s not dems going “oh we will only have ninety people killed” but rather “oh we lost, maybe we can sacrifice 91 people to appeal to the median voter”

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 12h

Those things are all horrible and I wholeheartedly agree. They matter as a problem but not in the context of a decision between two fixed options. What you’re doing here is fixating on how horrible it is that people are tied to trolley tracks. Of course that’s terrible, we need systemic change to prevent people being on the tracks in the first place. But voting is the switch and all that can do is choose between two bad outcomes. No matter how bad the blue one is, it is better than the red one

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 12h

Which is why it’s important to vote for harm reduction and organize outside of voting for systemic change. Both are important

upvote 1 downvote