Anonymous #2 11w

He’s defending Trump… a criminal

1

Anonymous OP 11w

Just because u don’t like Trump don’t make him a criminal. If u wanna see a real criminal google hunter biden

-1

Anonymous #2 11w

😂😂😂 Being convicted 34x makes him a criminal. And when did I say Hunter Biden isn’t a criminal? I’m not denying he’s a criminal but you’re definitely denying Trump is despite the facts. Make sure to zip up his pants when you’re done

4

Prove the jury lied about the verdict then. If there was no evidence it’s a crime for the jury to have ruled out of bias.

3

Then prove the jury lied. Prove it.

2

Anonymous OP 11w

Are u talking about the 34 felonies put against Trump ONLY so he wouldn’t run for president? But he has balls of steel and still did anyways. The same ones where there were no victims and even the banks said no crime was committed. That’s just literally political persecution bro

0

So it shouldn’t be hard for you to find a source that says that, right?

1

Bingo

1

Anonymous #2 11w

The so called balls of steel you can’t stop sucking.

3

Feelings are not proof

3

So you’re letting your feelings get in the way of facts. Got it

3

In other words, you have no proof.

4

These guys are so brainwashed and programmed to hate trump no matter what it’s not even worth wasting your time. Trump could save them from a burning building and they’d still hate him

-2

So then prove it. It shouldn’t be so hard to prove it.

5

Can you comprehend?

4

Anonymous #2 11w

Yeah you’re right. I’d still hate him. Because that doesn’t cancel out all the horrible things he’s done and will continue to do. Not my fault we don’t like licking boots of politicians and billionaires.

3

Anonymous #2 11w

Do you support Trump knowing this?

3

Common sense isn’t facts. Try again: Show proof it was rigged. I’m waiting.

2

Anonymous #4 11w

She gets 5m because he brushed up on her. He didn’t rape her dumbass

-2

I’ll take that as a no. You can’t even provide a single source. You should be able to back up your claims with proof yet you haven’t. You’re making up shit.

4

Anonymous #2 11w

Saying things isn’t showing proof that he’s NOT liable for sexual abuse It was a jury trial, prove the jury lied. I’ll wait.

3

Anonymous #2 11w

No he only touched her without her consent. It’s only sexual assault right? You’re defending a sexual assailant. Fuck you

5

Anonymous OP 11w

So if I tap u on your shoulder to get your attention I should be locked up for sexual assault?

-1

Anonymous OP 11w

Not saying that’s what Trump did but that’s the precedent she’s setting

0

Anonymous #2 11w

That’s not what Trump did you fucking moron. He touched her genitalia and that’s sexual assault

5

Anonymous #2 11w

Prove that the jury lied. We’re all waiting for you to stop throwing a tantrum and show the proof IF it’s real.

1

Anonymous #4 11w

I doesn’t matter. You will keep moving the goal post. You will just keep asking to prove and prove forever

-1

Anonymous OP 11w

I literally said that’s not what he did above. Also she sued him only for defamation not that sexual assault. And if he did that he’d be in prison bc she’d go after him criminally. She just wanted money and u fell for her scam too

-1

Anonymous #2 11w

So you won’t show proof of something that would prove you right because of something else that hasn’t happened?

3

Anonymous #2 11w

I’ve read the actual court documents. She didn’t just sue him for defamation, he was found legally responsible for the accusation of sexual abuse in a civil case. It’s funny to me you don’t know basic law

3

Anonymous #5 11w

lmfao they got cooked

3