Anonymous #4 1w

I think the part about saying the civil rights act was a mistake. Yuh know, the sweeping legislation that allowed for the integration of schools and other public facilities, prohibited discrimination in public spaces, and made employment discrimination illegal. So not quite but you’re on the path of true enlightenment on what racism actually is…

6

Anonymous #2 1w

He did say the civil rights was a mistake, but the policies that followed that incentivized single parent homes.

-1

Anonymous #4 1w

*didnt

-1

Anonymous #4 1w

Yes he did. He was connecting dots that don’t exist. The Civil Rights Act by outlawing public segregation and employment discrimination has no causal relationship to fathers in the home. There is no study showing this, there is nothing other than an observation that doesn’t even make sense. Correlation ≠ causation go back to highschool if you think the protections by the civil rights act SOMEHOW incentivizes single parents homes. What a fucking joke…😂

1

Anonymous #2 1w

Some social welfare programs literally incentivize single parent homes

0

Anonymous #4 1w

“Incentivizes” is a good way to put it for people that don’t want to actually understand the system… The problem with the term is that it’s relative. If I give you $10 for X you would say I’m encouraging it. But if the following week I give you $8 am I still encouraging it or am I now discouraging it because I lowered the rates? If I previously enforced a $10 penalty on Y, but then I changed it to $8 am I encouraging it or discouraging it? You can make arguments for both but no one wants to

1

Anonymous #4 1w

Rely on a few $100/month to support a child. And not only that, but then people will say child support makes up the difference, but child support itself notoriously difficult to enforce unless the father is actually just entirely ok with it.

1

Anonymous #4 1w

I think it’s important when we are trying to measure how much we are “incentivizing” something to look at the alternative. Two parents working a full time job is always going to provide better economical benefits compared to being a single mother living on welfare. There is no luxury to it that people think there is, and ending the benefits literally ultimately just takes food away from single mothers and children lmao.

1

Anonymous #4 1w

Also going back to civil rights act, that doesn’t even provide social welfare benefits so what do the two have to do with each other

1