Sadly this isn’t nearly true enough

21

Anonymous #7 3w

are you fucking stupid

68

Anonymous #7 3w

There should be low-level, unimportant jobs for people without experience so that they can acquire experience in a relatively low-stakes environment.

29

Anonymous #7 3w

Would you want a surgeon who has 0 medical and surgical experience to do brain surgery on you or would you want a cashier with 0 experience working a cash register scan your items and give you change?

27

Anonymous #8 3w

Ok, my company is a fast-paced high-stakes environment, we require 3-5 years experience minimum

-3

Anonymous #7 3w

And I give a shit because…?

11

Anonymous #8 3w

Exactly

-4

Anonymous #7 3w

The fact that no one gives a shit about your worthless company does not prove any point of yours.

19

Anonymous #9 3w

It’s not misinformation. Thomas Fugate is the current director of CP3

21

Anonymous #8 3w

Yeah he is, but the picture says he's the director of the counterrorism program, which he's not. He's the director of CP3. Joseph Kent is the director of the national counterterrorism center. I really shouldn't have to spell it out for you

-1

Anonymous #9 3w

The CP3 also counters terrorism. That is its job. It just focuses more on community-based prevention. Nothing in the post is misinformation just because the specific organization wasn’t mentioned. You’re desperately grasping at straws to defend the incompetency of the Trump administration. The most charitable interpretation of your critique is that it was simply a whataboutism, but it actually sounds like you were trying to discuss the same topic as the post.

14

Anonymous #8 3w

Hey buddy

4

Anonymous #8 3w

You're desperately grasping at straws to try and defend a disingenuous post. You seem like a sad and depressed person. I bet you're super fun at parties though. You probably have a lot of friends too.

3

It’s not. Two different people lead two different organizations with overlapping goals. What’s so difficult to understand about this? It is not inaccurate to say that Joseph Kent leads our anti-terrorism program, and it is not inaccurate to say that Thomas Fugate leads our anti-terrorism program. If it’s difficult for you to wrap your head around the fact that our government has multiple anti-terrorism programs, you should be pretty embarrassed.

13

Anonymous #8 3w

Also, the picture says he's the lead of the program, which he isn't lmao.

0

Anonymous #9 3w

He’s the lead of CP3. The post isn’t incorrect. It just lack detail. Neither Joseph Kent nor the NCTC is relevant to the post. You just want to interpret it that way because of your preconceived biases.

6

Anonymous #8 3w

Yeah he is, but not the leader of the primary anti terrorism program in the United States. I really have to spell it out for your smooth brain again.

0

Anonymous #9 3w

Notice how it says, PRIMARY

5

Anonymous #9 3w

Lmao. I think it’s quite obvious to everyone who is grasping at straws here seeing as you’re the one having to keep qualifying your claim based on which one is more "primary." The reality is that they aren’t comparable at all. They have completely different purposes. Nothing you are saying is relevant.

0

Anonymous #9 3w

Notice how the post DOESN’T say "primary"? 🤣

1

Anonymous #8 3w

It is relevant, you just don't want it to be relevant because it disproves your point. He is not the leader of the anti terrorism program. He's the leader of CP3, which isn't what the post says. Showing misinformation and how the post is disingenuous. You're the reason the United States education system is so frowned upon.

0

Anonymous #8 3w

You might genuinely be the stupidest person I've ever seen. And I'm not just saying that.

0

Anonymous #9 3w

"Our anti-terrorism program" is a vague allusion to the goal of the specific organization they are referring to. It does not specify the organization. You are (falsely) ASSUMING which organization they meant to try to characterize the post as misinformation, which is incredibly stupid since there is an organization they could have meant that makes it accurate (CP3).

0

Anonymous #9 3w

It is more likely that they were referring to an organization that makes all the facts align than coming up with a random lie that would be true if they were just referring to a different organization. Learn how to implement the law of parsimony (Occam’s razor).

0

Anonymous #7 3w

that was a stupid thing to say and you know it lmao

3