Anonymous #1 1w

^I’m sayin. Y’all aren’t a bit suspicious that the files released by the trump admin are full of less than damning photos of bill Clinton ?

2

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1w

man this is why nobody gets arrested lmao. yes the Trump admin manipulated the files that’s the most obvious thing in the world but holy shit Bill Clinton is not an innocent man being framed😭 that mf is evil.

7

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1w

like let’s show some conviction here.

4

Anonymous shrimp_fried_rice 1w

I can’t find the pic of your dog in my camera roll 😭 wanted to post that as a reply

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Ok but he has to be charged with a specific crime. There’s a very good reason we don’t send people to jail for vague reasons

5

Anonymous OP 1w

Dude I’m just saying let’s be intentional here. The idea that everyone is corrupt at roughly the same level is how authoritarians all around the world put up smoke screens around their own corruption. Look at Putin.

-1

Anonymous #1 1w

Are we forgetting the time he had to resign as president bc he raped an intern? Out of conscience to hate Trump more?

1

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1w

Also it’s just useless in a practical sense. Ok we’ve assumed every major politician is a pedophile. What now? We can’t get rid of all of them, guess we need to figure out who the biggest offenders are. How do we do that? By finding evidence. Then we’re back to square one. The only people who benefit from throwing facts and the legal process out the window are people like trump

1

Anonymous #4 1w

He was impeached but not convicted and did not resign

1

Anonymous #4 1w

You gotta fill me in cause this is news to me

3

Anonymous #1 1w

He was acquitted by the senate which is some bullshit bc the only charges that was brought against him was lying under oath about his sexual contact with her. Not the actual rape. Which is psychotic and we should be disgusted

1

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1w

I meant to say nearly resigned but fucking Apple keyboards are the devil and don’t type half the shit it’s supposed to

1

Anonymous #4 1w

Ok yk to be fair I didn’t know about the accusation of rape so that’s sorta valid. But it seems to me that there wasn’t a real case to be made on the rape charge. You’re talking about Broaddrick right?

1

Anonymous #1 1w

The Epstein transparency act says they can only redact victims and stuff critical to active investigations. The fact the women are redacted should mean they are victims, but I’m not sure they didn’t just redact everybody but Bill Clinton and dead people

1

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1w

Monica dude. She was an intern and he was the president. There’s no way for her to have been able to reasonably consent due to the power imbalance. It’s like prisoners and COs level of power imbalance.

1

Anonymous #4 1w

Legally idk if that’s rape, but it’s absolutely an ethical/HR issue

4

Anonymous #1 1w

At the time probably not, but most modern legal guidelines for consent would allow it to have been charged as rape (ofc state by state law differences change this, but generally this would be true in most jurisdictions)

1

Anonymous #4 1w

Oh yeah, I mean that’s terrible for sure but I don’t think rape is an accurate term. Not trying to excuse his actions there, just trying to express that it’s different from true rape like what trump did to E Jean Carrol

1

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1w

Again, with most legal guidelines for consent, under modern law she would not have been able to legally consent, and thus it was “real” rape. Different kinds of rape than Trump and e Jean Carrol, yes, but no less real

1

Anonymous #4 1w

Could you elaborate on that? Tbh I’m not familiar with how those laws work, I thought rape was more defined by a person physically forcing themselves on someone or something like that? Cause she was of legal age albeit very young (22). If it is as you say, how do they determine what adults can and can’t consent based on relationships?

1

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1w

Rape is generally defined as non consensual sexual acts, though this does also depend on state laws around sexual battery, sexual assault, and harassment and where these definitions are differentiated. Many things limit people’s ability to consent, such as age, mental capacity (including intoxication), and coercion (which would include cases of extreme power imbalance)

6

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1w

Having sex with a superior is usually a serious problem, at least in the eyes of corporate HR, because sometimes promotions and other things can hang in the balance. I think Harvey Weinstein did some of that

1

Anonymous #4 1w

Appreciate it 🙏 ig I just mean, is there an agreed upon metric for types of relationships that would make sexual acts rape automatically? Like if a McDonald’s employee and manager had sex that likely wouldn’t be coercion. But at the extreme end of president and very young aid it is. Is there a meter stick for this? Or is the term rape applied as the result of jury deliberation or something?

1

Anonymous #1 1w

Yeah I knew that, I just mean that having sex with a superior while obviously problematic is not Inherently rape

1

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1w

The thresholds are different depending on state statutes and case law, but generally if someone’s livelihoods are threatened in a way a “reasonable and prudent” person would find valid, it would be considered coercive. That would be the prosecution and defense’s main argument, and ultimately decided by the jury.

1

Anonymous #4 1w

But there are coercive sexual encounters that aren’t rape right? What makes the distinction?

1

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1w

In states that have clear outlines for the difference of sexual battery and assault, it would probably be considered assault instead of sexual battery. But not all states have those distinctions and it would all be under the same charge. That’s kind of the difficult with law, you can’t make super general statements bc everything is really on a state by state, case by case basis

1

Anonymous fuuuckyikyak 1w

But all coercive sexual encounters ARE crimes. No if ands or buts about that

1