
Genocide is also a modern term with 20th century (thus fundamentally modern) sensibilities at its core. A genocide doesn’t even necessarily require extermination through violence/death, genocide could be cultural or social in nature like stripping away culture from one group to enforce a different culture on that same group. It depends on how strict your definition of genocide is but what is happening in Gaza is 100% a genocide of some variety unless you are obtusely restricting the definition
Oh I’m sure, and it also ignores the fact that many anti Zionist Jews exist. The JVP is doing great work for example. People like oop don’t care about Jewish people or else they would actually listen I’m not Jewish, but I am trans, and to a much lesser extent I get the same treatment. The whole “well be trans in Gaza” is similar in that it’s a cynical use of identity to justify genocide
You didn’t study history in higher education and it shows. There is a massive gap between a PhD and a BA but a lot of history students (probably most) work with a PhD in their field or concentration during studies. I myself am friends with several PhD professors in my concentration. Having a BA in History does actually mean something, it’s much harder to bs your way through a history degree than an English or art degree
No one is saying anyone is high and mighty or that you absorb information by working with people. I am pointing out that studying history requires you to understand the material, context, among other things and that you have a large quantity of opportunities to continuously learn from people who know more than you. Again, you don’t seem to be familiar with what I am talking about, which indicates that you have not studied in a similar way