Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
It’s so amusing how Leftists claim to be intellectuals and call Conservatives “rightoids” Yet they boil complex issues (healthcare, Iran War, Cuba) into one liners: crisis in Cuba is caused by US, Iran War bad, universal healthcare good. 0 nuance lol 🙂
upvote -10 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 19h

The current crisis in Cuba IS caused by the US and us bombing girls schools in Iran IS bad…?

upvote 19 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 19h

This stuff is not complex at all bro 🥀🥀🥀

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 19h

I’m curious what your nuanced take on Iran is. Maybe those school girls had it coming?

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 19h

Brother, hit me.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 19h

Once they repeat their 1 liner, they usually can’t answer follow up questions (bc they haven’t actually thought through the issue)

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 19h

No no, you see, us bombing that school is a complicated topic with lots of nuance 🤓

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 19h

Why not give an opinion and make your points instead of having a meta argument about how people who disagree with you argue

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 19h

Question #1: thoughts on sugar production and labor shortages? To what extent are they responsible for the current crisis?

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 19h

Yeah too bad their sugar-generated power grid can’t run anymore due to their sugar productions problems lmao

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 19h

Central planners didn’t plan for enough sugar production. The energy workers are starving as a result and that’s why hospitals have to shut down 💯

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 19h

Question #1: In 2023, Iran launched 180 rocket and drone strikes on coalition troops in Iraq. Iran also supports terror proxies in Yemen, Lebanon. Intelligence suggests Iran had developed long range missiles and 60% enriched uranium. In January, Iran killed 30,000 student protestors. As President, how would you respond to the Iran situation?

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 19h

Ready for Question #1 ?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 19h

Probably listen to the experts that have modeled a conflict with Iran for years, who showed that the biggest piece of leverage Iran has is closing Hormuz. Would wipe my hands clean of the problem and do nothing and win. Morality is not a factor here, don’t act like the US hasn’t committed its own atrocities.

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 19h

Maybe not pulled out of JCPOA in the first place

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 19h

In fact, I wouldn’t have broken the nuclear deal we had with them to begin with. But the worst thing you could do is start a hot war with nothing to gain. We’ve given them all the incentive they need to actually want a nuke

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 19h

Question #2: Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Egypt have all publicly stated if Iran develops a nuclear weapon, they too will develop nuclear weapons. Critics argue nuclear proliferation in the Middle East is dangerous, given regional instability. Should a crisis occur, it could escalate to all out nuclear war. Since the Cold War, preventing the proliferation of nuclear weapons has been seen as a global imperative. As President, how do you balance non-interference with a potential Nuclear Iran?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 19h

JCPOA

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 19h

Those are major symptoms but not root causes of the crisis. The crisis is mostly driven by systemic inefficiencies in state-run agriculture, decades-long U.S. sanctions, and the crippling lack of foreign currency.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 19h

These are easy questions because the solution already existed, it just needed a president to come along and mess everything up. Really Israel should have its nukes confiscated.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 19h

Time Machine. Cool. So you acknowledge there’s no good solution.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 19h

Not anymore no, Trump sort of just repeatedly shot himself in the foot

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 19h

No there is no good solution anymore. Trump saw to that

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 19h

going to war with Iran ensured there was no good solution, usually electing to go to war when you have other choices tends to be the wrong decision

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 19h

I give zero shits about Iran and what Israel wants the US to do for them. I’d probably negotiate and grant concessions. But negotiations have been made more difficult by a certain country whom use them as opportunities to attack. Israel is an enemy to stability in the region, a war between the US and Iran only benefits them, not the US nor Iran

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 19h

What’s your opinion? You seem antsy to give a nuanced take

upvote 4 downvote