Anonymous sunset_plug67 2w

Wrong 😂 silly rightoid

7

Anonymous sunset_plug67 2w

It does exist, it’s just not enforced, and that is because of right-wingers

9

Anonymous sunset_plug67 2w

Rightoids defending raping children (they are pedophiles)

6

Anonymous OP 2w

Why do all rightoids call age of consent laws infringements? 🤔

5

Anonymous #3 2w

also i’m not really a rightoid just a realist

0

Anonymous #2 2w

It’s not enforced because it’s practically against international law for countries to enforce it without considerable effort.

0

Anonymous #4 2w

it’s not enforced because it’s designed to protect the interests of capitalist states rather than humanity as a whole

1

Anonymous OP 2w

Why do you leftoids simply REFUSE to shower

-2

Anonymous #6 2w

it is racialized, it does exist. it was never meant to protect the global south. accept it. it is to aid its plunder.

10

Anonymous sunset_plug67 2w

Projection 🤭 nice try rightoid

7

Anonymous OP 2w

Stop lying to yourself. We can all smell it. You reek

-1

Anonymous sunset_plug67 2w

every accusation is a confession lol

3

Anonymous #2 2w

Bro, it was literally started with the USSR as one of the big five. It was made to keep peace after WWII. There are plenty of resolutions each year that pass or almost pass against the will of the US. How the hell is the UN designed to protect capitalist interests, other than make long a more secure world, which is in the interest of everyone.

0

Anonymous #4 2w

The UN didn't create a "secure world for everyone.” It created a regulated arena for capitalist states to compete without blowing each other up, while collectively keeping the global working class in check. Making the world "secure" for investment isn't the same as making it just for people.

1

Anonymous #2 2w

The UN wasn’t designed around capitalism, it was designed around power balance to prevent another world war. That’s why the USSR/Russia, US, UK, France, and China all have veto power in the Security Council. It includes every recognized country in the world, most of which aren’t Western, and the General Assembly regularly passes resolutions critical of the US and Israel. What you’re addressing much closer to the IMF or World Bank.

0

Anonymous #4 2w

The UN (and the League of Nations before it) aren’t neutral arbiters but an alliance of robbers. The Security Council veto isn’t about peace but rather a mechanism to ensure that no major imperialist power’s core interests (markets, resources, spheres of influence, etc.) are threatened by the others. They can get back to the real business of exploiting the Global South and the working class.

1