I literally don’t give a fuck about your recycled shitass ad hominem apologetics

3

Comment Deleted

0

Yes ad hominem. Your attack was based on the composition of the commission itself and not on the evidence presented. The British made reports about Nazi German atrocities in Europe. The British had their fair share of human rights abuses. Does that mean the reports were fake?

1

Anonymous OP 11w

But you types don’t care about the evidence. Your opinion is pre-determined. Thus every atrocities must either be denied or excused.

1

Comment Deleted

0

Literally repeating exactly what an ad hominem is. Was that really your example? You get called that a lot?

6

Also the British literally invented concentration camps. The German concentration camps they reported were still real. Fucking duh.

5

Comment Deleted

0

Of course you use fucking grok. And oh look another ad hominem! Slightly error on my part. The Cuban camps slightly predate the British ones. But the British heavily pioneered their use during the Second Boer War, which inspired Germany to first use them during the Herero and Nama genocide, which inspired the Holocaust. Still, the British had them before the Germans.

2

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #2 11w

Not like Netanyahu! Who is completely honest and always tells the truth

1

You don’t know what’s wrong with the ai that started calling itself “mechahitler”? Yeah checks out that you’d defend genocide.

1

Comment Deleted

0

Most free thinking grok user:

5

Comment Deleted

0

Because this isn’t a debate. I don’t give a fuck. You’ve clearly shown you aren’t going to engage in evidence so I’m just going to clown on you for my own amusement.

5

Anonymous OP 11w

Like bro I’m not arguing with you on equal footing, you gave that up the moment your choice was to “nuh uh” clear evidence for genocide and sidestep all presented evidence for vacillating bullshit. You just don’t like receiving what you dish out.

5