Anonymous #2 2w

Yeah thats the vague idea but what part of the cell or dna is fully unknown

6

Anonymous #4 2w

Frfr like the whole patent thing legit just says money printer (hai insulin guy (super Hitler))

1

Anonymous OP 2w

Not the original guy he was super chiller the new guy

2

Anonymous #5 2w

The premise that the elites exist only to make money completely ignores the fact they see themselves as inherently superior to those who don’t have their levels of wealth and power

1

Anonymous #5 2w

I mean sure the rich and powerful be doing shit we can’t comprehend but the idea they’re doing stuff no one on earth could ever think off with thousands of the worlds brightest working on it all at once wild

1

Anonymous OP 2w

They have more than enough wealth to bankroll their own armies of private researchers to accomplish whatever they could possibly want without publishing for peer review. I think it’s ridiculous to suggest they couldn’t achieve scientific process while hiding it from the greater scientific community

0

Anonymous #5 2w

U don’t know many stem majors do u…

7

Anonymous #5 2w

After all all modern scientific process is built on the back of capital

0

Anonymous OP 2w

Not sure what knowing stem majors has to do with anything, all I know is not a single bit of research in the past 40 years was conducted without grant money (money physically not possible to have without rich backers)

0

Anonymous #5 2w

If u know stem majors u know a single dm can get u years and years of paywalled research for free with a tutor to explain it to u all because we too atustic and hyped up about how cool our shit is too keep it to ourselves

9

Anonymous OP 2w

That sounds anecdotal at best…

0

Anonymous #5 2w

It’s not I got my anti androgen research fully done for me by a cancer researcher who taught me how to synthesize bica Not to mention all of my friends who got papers fully explained to them in their research U gotta remember restrictions happen without the researchers control and every researcher wants to spread the word

1

Anonymous OP 2w

>”it’s not anecdotal” >anecdotes >mfw

0

Anonymous #5 2w

U know this is like a famous thing in all stem fields To the point where it’s common advice to just dm the researcher on LinkedIn if u dont understand anything I pull up anecdotes becuase it’s the most concrete thing I can say outside of a billion people telling me to dm the guys who discover it

5

Anonymous #5 2w

brother, you don’t know more about medicine than the people studying medicine there is no secret cure for cancer bc diff types of cancers are caused by diff things also the wealthy don’t know if treatments work without studies, so if they have a secret “cure” they don’t even know if it works you’re just a conspiratorial numbnut

6

Anonymous #6 2w

Counter point bush def killed jfk

0

Anonymous OP 2w

evidence

1

Anonymous #6 2w

Him supposedly forgetting who was supposed to be in charge of jfk’s security that day, the evidence for a second shooter being mysteriously lost under cia supervision, and the current theory of the shot being unable to be recreated in any simulation ever

0

Anonymous OP 2w

supposedly forgetting is an urban myth, he was in Tyler Texas at a lunch club, the National Academy of Sciences debunked the second shooter myth perpetrated by HSCA as misinterpreting the mechanics on Oswald’s firearm, and a simulation is 100% possible and has been confirmed lmfao Spreading debunked claims is quite something lol

1

Anonymous #6 2w

Debunked claims Look inside Talked to people personally who were on the committee Actual video footage of the future director of cia say he doesn’t know who was in charge of saying “windows shouldn’t be a problem durring this parade”

0

Anonymous OP 2w

there is no actual video footage unless it’s AI-edited, he never said that I did a whole project on the misinformation surrounding the JFK assassination Did the CIA fuck up the records surrounding Oswald? Yeah. Did the CIA dislike JFK? Of course. Is there any evidence to suggest a broader conspiracy? Not in the slightest outside of disinformation or unreliable, unproven claims.

1

Anonymous OP 2w

A lot of the conspiratorial claims come from Russ Baker’s Family of Secrets book which has many uncorroborated, unverified claims Id love to see corroborated evidence from more than one source before jumping to conspiratorial conclusions

1