
I limit my caving somewhat because i dont have ppl to go with (recently moved across the country) so i dont go too deep. I’m also a bigger guy so i dont fw tight squeezes. But lava beds national monument in Northern California has some cool lava tubes you can go in. Some of them have indigenous petroglyphs near the entrances.
We live in an era where you can see the world. It is unprecedented. What is the point of not taking advantage of it? See the redwoods. Snorkel with corals. Learn another language. Meet people of other cultures. Learn from their experiences. Try their food. You only have one life. Make the most of it.
Some of the most beautiful parts of the world are not digitized. The majesty of a redwood does not come through in a photo. The wonder of seeing a whale swim beneath you. The intricate cultural experiences of being in another country. A great many archaeological sites are not digitized and are not well known outside of the local area.
Are you familiar with ecotourism? It was an essential part of my degree. Without ecotourism, in many areas there is little incentive to preserve the environment, and few places for employment. I’ve been to the Galápagos Islands and to rural South Africa. The reason those ecosystems are preserved rather than destroyed is because they are more profitable for the local people to keep around. And that tourism is what gives local people employment.
Overtourism is bad. Tourism has to be managed sustainably. But there is a reason local governments try to promote it. Hell, I come from a tourist town. That’s the thing that sustains my hometowns economy. And there is a reason conservationists like myself see it as an essential part of preserving ecosystems.
Yeah. So like in the part of South Africa I visited, outside of the nature reserves most of the large mammals have been hunted out of existence. The only place they still exist is within the reserves. And without tourists coming to see the lions, the local people would probably just kill them. It’s not worth the risk to themselves and their livestock. And the safaris are an essential source of employment in a pretty impoverished area.
Truly one of the best places I’ve been in regards to sustainable tourism is the Galápagos Islands. Tourism is strictly regulated there and is solely based around the wildlife. So no huge sterile beaches. Most of the businesses are locally owned, so no mega hotels displacing locals. Now people no longer eat the tortoises, and preserving the wildlife is what preserves the economy. And it’s a massive source of income that helps the Ecuadorean government fund poverty alleviation.
Think about it. People need to make income somehow. And if you live in a small tropical island, it’s going to be tourism, money laundering, or fishing and agriculture. Intensive tropical agriculture is super environmentally damaging. It’s good to have an economic value to preserving the forest. But it of course needs to be balanced, like anything does. Costa Rica is the poster child for ecotourism done right.
They need to bring money in somehow. An elephant is either going to be valuable poached or valuable as something tourists want to take pictures of. Ecotourism is the alternative to poaching in much of Africa. It’s the only thing keeping the gorillas in Rwanda alive. They’re too damaging to crops otherwise.