Anonymous #1 8w

That is not happening. You thinking that’s happening is you being a propagandized zombie with none of your own thoughts. Literally just regurgitating nonsense proving my point

9

Anonymous #1 8w

Have you been attacked by a gang of migrants or something? Or do you just hear sensationalized headlines

11

Anonymous OP 8w

It is happening and there is overwhelming proof, not just the thousands of Moroccan men that are going to sack the small community which is being denied any protection

-3

Anonymous #1 8w

You can call it nonsense but you have no business to stand on

-2

Anonymous #2 8w

I don’t live in the UK, but I’ve seen the statistics, the rape inquiry, and the countless examples of places where natives are minority and subjugated. You do not have to live in Israel or in Palestine to understand the conflict, do why do I have to have first hand experience for this?

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

The subjugated natives bro is talking about is fucking white British people and not the actual subjugated indigenous groups in Europe who are threatened by the exact assimilatory policies the European right supports.

10

Anonymous #3 8w

Oh really? Who is forcing large populations on them, who is swallowing their culture? What if I told you that the people coming in now will swallow the British and them?

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

The British aren’t losing their culture bro

11

Anonymous #1 8w

So do you just not have any fucking clue about any history before 1776?

6

Anonymous #3 8w

Well some British are. But that’s the welsh, Scots, Gaels, northumbrians, Cornish, travelers, and northern Irish being subject to English assimilation. Not the English dudes you’re thinking of lol

6

Comment Deleted

0

Yeah clearly you don’t know what it is, you’ve made that clear.

4

Anonymous #3 8w

There is a legitimate concern of Morocco invading Ceuta, that is something their government has threatened. Dudes looking for jobs in a richer country isn’t what that looks like.

4

Anonymous #3 8w

Yes it is an invasion. incursion of an army for conquest or plunder. There is no justification for overpowering a small population unless you are trying to ethnically cleanse them. There is no justification for why many London counties have 50%+ Middle Eastern recent migrants, who espouse their culture and their Islam, unless that is the dominant power you want.

0

Anonymous #1 8w

Oh isn’t that the UK rape inquiry written by the guy who is supported by literal fucking neonazis?

3

Anonymous #1 8w

fucking imbecilic nationalists. no, it’s not, you’re just a cowardly little fuck who can’t stand the idea of living next to someone with a culture different from your own. you are the problem, ultimately.

6

Anonymous #6 8w

Nah when the native Americans were being subjected to mass migration of Brits they had the right to fight don’t you think? Or are you pro-colony. You are the pushover that the elites want you to be

-2

Anonymous #1 8w

dipshit you’re doing the bidding of the “elites” right now. Who the fuck do you think is funding the bullshit you’re spreading? why do you think 4chan’s pol board was discovered to be an intentional plant by Jeffrey Epstein and the like in order to radicalize the masses towards extremism? you’re a literal clown.

6

Anonymous #6 8w

I don’t even use 4chan lmao. You’re so brainshot it’s insane. Can you at least agree that the native Americans were just in defending themselves upon the advent of the mass migration of British to their areas?

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

and don’t try and tokenize the indigenous population for your own exclusionary goals, as the founders of this country held the exact same ideology as you, except in their own favor, aka white supremacy. I wonder why you didn’t mention land-back, either? Or is that too far for the likes of you? surely you don’t need a reminder on Spain’s own history as a colonizing nation as well, right? Hell, the line of demarcation?

8

Anonymous #1 8w

I would say they are

-1

Anonymous #6 8w

You avoid the question because you exactly where I’m going but you hate white peoples because it’s only colonization when white people are going to other lands and building their infrastructures and buying up land.

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

You hold their ideology against the Europeans and against the native British. We are not the same. If you want to argue that we should deport hundreds of millions of people from a country that has existed for a while now be my guest. I don’t look at the scar on my right arm why my left bleeds out.

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

you’re a genuine imbecile, you responded as I was typing my second comment then got pissy when I never saw the question you lobbed. obviously they were, but you’re not being colonized you stupid fuck. the fact that you’re trying to compare MIGRATION to a fucking COLONIAL GENOCIDE is baffling, and it just shows how much of a scumbag you are.

6

Anonymous #6 8w

and I am white, you fucking moron, I’m just not an utter piece of shit like many of my fellow white people, such as yourself.

6

Anonymous #6 8w

Yes I am. My population is lowering, the other is increasing. My children are being raped, my towns and my communities are being overwhelmed. My land is being taken. And the government will do nothing, and what is happening in Spain is just what I am fighting against. I have a right to exist. England has a right to exist, whether you like it or not.

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

I say this not out of hatred, but love for my people, that they should not be replaced in their own ancestral homeland. We can ignore the Native American proposition. Do you think it’s right for a native population to be overwhelmed by another?

0

Anonymous #1 8w

dipshit, that is not colonization you fucking imbecile. and why don’t you show actual statistics and *proof* that link immigrant populations to the crimes you mention, instead of the native citizens being at fault? you won’t do that though, because you’re merely weaponizing the emotional response of certain crimes rather than relying on actual events and facts. you’re a dirty white supremacist and you’ll one day suffer the consequences for these choices.

3

Anonymous #1 8w

Does bro think the Italians were ethnically cleansing the English when they came to New York 💔

8

Anonymous #1 8w

Don’t act like you give a single shit about Native Americans bro

8

Anonymous #6 8w

Your self-hatred and guilt debilitates you. If you cannot love yourself, how could you love anyone like you? Nobody is supposed to be force-fed that.

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

England, one of the most notorious colonizing state in history, I might add. fucking white supremacists I stg, genuinely the utter dumbest people on the planet.

3

Anonymous #6 8w

Yeah like I wonder if he knows why Spain shares a land border with Morocco lol

6

Anonymous #1 8w

“My land” bro you’re from fucking Topeka Kansas or some shit

4

Anonymous #1 8w

you. are. a. scumbag. the fact that you’re even regurgitating the *exact same propaganda* that white supremacists used to use decades and centuries ago is fucking insane. you genuinely just tried the “race traitor” card? give it a rest skinhead.

6

Anonymous #6 8w

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

get your bullshit personal website out of here, you degenerate freak. I know you’re not that educated, but we’re talking about *scholarly sources* I recommend you look up the term if you don’t know what that means.

4

Anonymous #6 8w

https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/the-impact-of-migration-on-uk-population-growth/

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

“Migration observatory” do you need your hand held as we google the definition of “scholarly sources”, or are you capable of doing it on your own? I’m sure you can do it.

3

Anonymous #6 8w

https://zenodo.org/records/18151364

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

I don’t care about whether or not a source is scholarly. If its information is not false, why would I contend with it? You alway use these silly barriers. You let elites control what you look at. If you restrict yourself, you only fall into subservience?

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

“If it’s information is not false, why would I contend with it” is such a fucking silly thing to say oh my god

1

Anonymous #3 8w

I mean if you find that an independent journal or someone online has backed up information you can’t just block it off and not look into it for clarity.

1

Anonymous #1 8w

because it is false, you stupid fuck. it’s not peer reviewed, it’s not corrected, it’s blatant disinformation. you don’t give a fuck though because you merely wish to feed confirmation bias in favor of your violent white supremacist ideology.

5

Anonymous #3 8w

All you do is doubt my intentions and make assumptions about how I feel. You attack my character but you can’t attack reality.

-1

Anonymous #6 8w

Falsify the data then. Show where there is error.

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

dipshit you literally tried the race traitor card shut the fuck up. you do a sufficient job at destroying the image of your own character all on your own. you just don’t like being called out for your bullshit.

5

Anonymous #6 8w

Here’s what you look like on my end: I declare a statement about the world You insult me and ask for evidence I provide what I think is evidence You insult me and say it is lying Sounds like an indoctrinated person to me right?

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

you utter moron. look up the definition of the word “falsify” and get back to me; and no, I’m not considering any non-scholarly sources you provide. if you want to provide data, you provide actual studies or scientific research that support your claim; not some bullshit article on a white supremacists blog.

3

Anonymous #6 8w

If you can’t contend with what I give you it just goes to show that you don’t actually have anything of substance to say besides insulting me. I can’t be a skinhead if I’m not racist, but see you are told you connect certain ideas with what is bad, not that an idea is wrong. Labels are only an obstacle to the content within.

-1

Anonymous #6 8w

I did. Did you also know that there is a crisis in science. Many peer-reviewed studies are not replicable, which hurts the trust of anyone who isn’t just a bootlicker

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

I don’t give a fuck how I look on your end, that’s the issue in your assumptions. I don’t give a fuck about the claims or perspective of a white supremacist, especially when you’ve gone entirely mask off. Also, did you forget where you pulled the “self hate” race traitor card? you can’t propagandize the conversation acting as if you’re a victim while using century-old white supremacist propaganda.

4

Anonymous #6 8w

It’s not wrong, media and education has for a long time suggested that anyone that isn’t white is somehow more spiritual and having a culture. I’ve had to deprogram that, because I used to think that being white meant I had no culture and no identity where as people in Africa and America for example were the only ones who had rich culture and identity.

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

And now we’re falling into the anti-intellectualism, naturally; and no, you didn’t. You posted niche blogs, no scholarly publications. let me guess, the only science you accept is ones that accelerate and advance eugenics

3

Anonymous #1 8w

We are taught to hate the British for their empire and we are taught all the wars of Europe, but we were never taught to hate Genghis Khan

-1

Anonymous #6 8w

I don’t believe in eugenics. Eugenics was used to sterilize people who were deemed undesirable. Who am I sterilizing? Also, you are so wrong. You are an academic elitist, not an intellectual. You believe that only those with a certain class that have top education in universities to be the ultimate givers of truth.

0

Anonymous #1 8w

Oh my god the “anti-white racism” bullshit too. You’re quite literally just a coward, who as a result of your failures, decided to blame entire demographics instead of change yourself. you, and other white people like you, are the issue. You’re too much of a coward to reflect on yourself, and instead you resort to adopting century old forms of discrimination and hate in an attempt to justify your inadequacy.

5

Anonymous #1 8w

do you even know where the term “white” comes from, in reference to racial groups?

5

Anonymous #1 8w

Because modern people aren’t still suffering from mongol oppression dude that’s so obvious if you think about it for three seconds. Genghis Khan sucked but he isn’t relevant to modern inequality.

6

Anonymous #6 8w

You insult me but you can’t contend with me. I know you’ll never believe that you are in fact extremely brainwashed, but maybe one day you’ll understand that people can do things you hate, with good intentions, and you treating me like shit has no good intentions, when you could refrain from the language.

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

attempting to redirect into disparaging me does not alleviate your flaws as a white supremacist.

2

Anonymous #3 8w

That’s not why though. That’s just your rationalization. It does not make sense to villainize the totality of a culture and heritage because of one historical era in time that has impacts today? Or to imply as though Europeans have less spirituality or culture? You didn’t need to do that.

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

mate your delusions is nothing more than that: delusions. if you dislike how you’re being treated, maybe reconsider how you treat others. white supremacists don’t deserve a semblance of civility or stability, and I’ll do everything in my power to ensure that. you want to destabilize the lives of countless others on the premise of race? we’ll make sure you’re treated exactly how you deserve. don’t try to appeal to civility when you’ve already dropped the mask.

5

Anonymous #6 8w

Again you only prove my point. If I am a white supremacist, how come I do not believe that all other cultures should succumb to white cultures, or that white culture should overtake all others?

0

Anonymous #6 8w

Your ideology is destabilizing Europe. I am the stabilizer. I treat people who give me respect with respect. By default I treat them with respect. I do not treat others poorly.

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

a white segregationist is also a white supremacist. do you think that Jim Crow laws weren’t white supremacy? and go ahead and try explaining this one then.

3

Anonymous #6 8w

so you don’t know where the term comes from, 1?

5

Anonymous #1 8w

your entirely ideology is built off the disparaging of others. being civil and “respectful” is meaningless when you’re advocating against their legal rights and protections, you malicious fuck.

6

Anonymous OP 8w

It would appear so

1

Anonymous #6 8w

how is loving yourself white supremacy. Where did I say you can only love yourself if you are white?

-1

Anonymous #6 8w

Are you arguing that a nation has no right to act when a population is forced on it that is in lieu of overtaking it.

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

you’re a genuine imbecile. The comment threads are still up.

6

Anonymous #6 8w

You are arguing against the protections of cultures and societies.

-1

Anonymous #6 8w

If I would apply my thinking to every culture that is be subjected to what my culture is being subjected to, would that just make me a supremacist?

0

Anonymous #1 8w

see how you had to rig that entire statement before even sending it? “Forced on it” “in lieu of overtaking it” you’re giving yourself away. Immigration is not invading a nation, but you seemingly see non-white people migrating as a threat, specifically as one that requires action. you’re too stupid for your own good.

5

Anonymous #6 8w

I didn’t say only white. Do you think you should hate yourself for the color of your skin, or others for that matter? I don’t think so.

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

do you know where the term “white” comes from in regards to racial groups? don’t avoid the question.

4

Anonymous #6 8w

I gave you the evidence supporting this. There are videos that show this. The mutilations and the government’s favor given to non-natives. But you refuse to look or contend.

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

and no one said as such, I said you’re a scumbag for your beliefs, which I described as white supremacy, in which you responded that I was filled with self-hate. you can try propagandizing this as much as you want, but it’s you fault for being stupid enough to regurgitate literal centuries-old documented propaganda tactics.

5

Anonymous #6 8w

No I don’t? When I see extremely large numbers and no control or that a government is actively ignoring the people who originally live in those places then that is a problem. I never said I was against immigration. I’ve been against invasion and the disregard of native people that you seem so bent on supporting z

-1

Anonymous #6 8w

I also say European culture. I don’t need to use white, but then again, society teaches you that you are when you have to fill out “race” in some government forms and then apply all the negative things to that. I’m saying these things are issues because I see beyond that.

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

and you’re not under invasion you stupid fuck, that’s the entire point. You’re painting immigration as an invasion in order to justify your more violent beliefs. let me guess one of them: mass deportation/mass migration (which is a sign of ethnic cleansing I might add)

6

Anonymous #1 8w

how long are you going to avoid the question?

6

Anonymous #1 8w

I asked you a specific question, multiple times.

6

Anonymous #6 8w

I’m not painting immigration as an invasion. Yes I’m talking about massive unhealthy amounts of it

-1

Anonymous #6 8w

So you know it’s a sign of ethnic cleansing and yet you do nothing?

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

so youre not trying to paint the US or Spain as under invasion? you agree that anyone calling for deportations from the US or Spain would be unjustified, right? or do you admit that the white supremacist OOP was you? surely you don’t need an explanation in how the far-right wing exclusionary nationalist group based in Germany, the AfD, are white supremacists, right?

2

Anonymous #1 8w

mass forced migration is ethnic cleansing, aka mass deportations. you stupid fuck.

6

Anonymous #1 8w

and I’m waiting for your answer still. why avoid a simple question this long? do you not know the answer, or are you refusing to say?

5

Anonymous #6 8w

US has a very different issue from UK. They aren’t in the swamp. I’m not a particular fan of the ICE mortality record; I will say that unchecked migration at large scale and especially ones that are not lawful do call for deportation, no matter from what country or region. If Spain is experiencing the similar problem to UK, I would then call it an invasion. When small communities are overwhelmed I would consider that an invasion in those particular communities, and if it’s a widespread issue the

1

Anonymous #1 8w

n generally.

1

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #6 8w

So you’re trying to say that one ethnic cleansing is better than the other? LMAO mister supremacist over here. Hey, at least the people that are deported would have a country, nation and culture to return to.

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

except an invasion is very specific, and implies malicious intent (as well as collective organization) amongst the “invaders” you can’t assign that merely on the premise of citizen vs non-citizen, but in doing so you’re vilifying the immigrant population in question. is it not the duty of the government to tend to those small communities? should you not be upset at your government for not providing enough social safety nets, instead of redirecting blame for social insecurity onto immigrant

2

Anonymous #6 8w

No it doesn’t. Invasion: an occasion when a large number of people or things come to a place in an annoying and unwanted way. Cambridge Dictionary

-1

Anonymous #6 8w

Populations who are less well-off than you are? do you not recognize how you’re just shifting blame onto an easy “target”, rather than actually addressing any issues at hand? you’re just looking for someone to blame, and that so happens to be non-white immigrants looking for better lives. going as far as vilifying them and relying on fringe, unverified, biased sources that confirm your bias instead of reflecting on your beliefs when actual statistics fail to support them.

6

Anonymous #6 8w

that is why you’re being criticized as a white supremacist, well on top of your little “self-hate” race traitor bullshit after I called you out for being one in the first place.

5

Anonymous #6 8w

That’s the thing the government is giving everything to incoming immigrants, while having no safety nets for the native communities that are being forced to undertake them. I’m not villainizing them. I’m just saying they are doing what any homogenous group of people that have mind for their culture alone and expressing it. It’s actually particular to specific regions like the Middle East where that kind of mindset is common

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

see, I can actually provide the source. Do large groups of immigrants from varying countries count as a unified army? Do they automatically count as “something usually hurtful”?

4

Anonymous #6 8w

Lmao so now you’re victim blaming. They are less well off, but if they’re bribing the same practices and attitudes from the place that’s less off they will ultimately impose that where they go. And that wouldn’t be an issue if they’d just respect the culture of the host country, and if the government wasn’t giving them favor over natives.

-1

Aren’t they classified by their own government as a far right extremist party? Especially for their historical revisionism around the Nazi party. Also, don’t they have ties to neo-Nazis

7

they’re inherently white supremacist nationalists, and they’re near synonymous with the early-stages of the national socialist German workers party in the 20s, aka the nazi party, before Hitler consolidated enough power to enact the dictatorship. you fail to recognize this because you hold similar beliefs as them. your failure to recognize their flaws does not absolve them of such, it only indicates your inability to recognize these things. (which makes sense in regards to how you think you’re

8

Anonymous #6 8w

not a white supremacist despite holding white supremacist ideological beliefs)

3

Anonymous #6 8w

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/invasion so can I but you don’t seem to always contend with them

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

I wonder why you didn’t post a picture…

3

Anonymous #1 8w

so, do large groups of immigrants from varying countries count as a unified army?

5

Anonymous #1 8w

(oh, before I forget: you stupid fuck)

5

ah wait I didn’t realize you weren’t 1 at first, but then again who gives a fuck.

5

Anonymous #6 8w

Any large amount coming with the result of a suppressed native culture often with the help or ignorance of the government, such that the native population is losing its own ability to govern itself is inherently wrong full stop

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

do you admit that you’re wrong for trying to classify immigration as an invasion, after seeing both your own cited definition and the leftism webster definition?

6

Anonymous #6 8w

I never classified immigration as an invasion

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

The results outweigh the meaning of the actions.

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

If I’m closing a door that prevents someone from getting out of a fire, am I simply closing a door or committing murder?

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

Even if I’m unaware, even if my intentions are good of neutral, that person still dies.

-1

Anonymous #1 8w

committing murder, both legally and technically. Also you’re an idiot.

4

Anonymous #1 8w

what do you think advocating for restricting (or even reversing via mass deportations) immigrations is? it’s the equivalent of “closing the door” in that scenario. if people are immigrating as a result of unsafe conditions, knowingly forcing them back into those conditions puts you partially at fault for what happens.

3

Anonymous #6 8w

Not necessarily equivalent. You would then have a door that has two thresholds, and the opening of one closes another. Also, the whole purpose of that was to propose that an action which results in a direct consequence is not at that point merely an action, not as an analogy for the UK situation.

0

Anonymous #1 8w

it’s not my fault you failed to recognize how you were shooting yourself in the foot prior to submitting that comment.

1

Anonymous #1 8w

You have one case where the loss is a profound loss of culture, identity, and representation in your own native country. The other party does not lose this at all if they leave.

0

Anonymous #6 8w

Not really. You misread and misused it because I forgot an intermediary step of explaining to you what my point is since you would assume things, although my example was more ambiguous than intended.

0

Anonymous #1 8w

see how you’re worried about “culture”, meanwhile trying to paint a picture of people who immigrate for the safety of their lives as an “invasion”? the more you talk, the more you confirm my critique of you being a white supremacist. you, quite plainly, are a scumbag.

1

Anonymous #1 8w

How do you compare that (if you accept it) with the “home dangers”, and the dangers that have increased for natives due to the government-incentivized invasion. You should also know that the condition of places in Middle East are poor due both to the historical actions of Britain/US and also the kind of social normals in regards to the treatment of women and their own government.

0

Anonymous #6 8w

Not all do so, and I already explained to you the principle I am using which you clearly did not listen to

0

Anonymous #1 8w

your own comments contest you. unless you’re finally willing to answer whether a group of immigrants from varying states can constitute an army; or even if a group of immigrants from a single country can constitute an army if fleeing their own government?

1

Anonymous #1 8w

“government-incentivized invasion” you’re not sneaky, but you are a scumbag.

0

Anonymous #1 8w

Who the fuck do you know who is villainizing the entirety of European culture?

1

Anonymous #3 8w

Bruh I’m in fucking Munich right now lol I don’t think Europeans lack culture

1

Comment Deleted

0

I don’t think bro knows what an invasion is

4

did you miss where I cited two separate definitions?

1

so, as I asked 1: does a group of immigrants fleeing their nations immediately classify as an army? surely I don’t need to remind you that an army is necessarily organized collectively. additionally, is a large group of immigrants inherently hurtful?

0

Comment Deleted

0

but the issue here is you’re insisting your own subjective perspective of being annoyed and not wanting immigrants is the norm. hence why I focused on the definitions tied in objectivity. for example, I could just as easily say multiple countries are being invaded by white supremacists, but you wouldn’t accept that statement now would you?

1

Anonymous #6 8w

lmao you asked for how invasion would apply and you are just moving goalposts. You are using your own subjective perspective of restricting the definitions only to what you want them to be. C2 is literally qualifying, nobody is debating that C1 is any less a definition.

1

Anonymous #1 8w

and if you still don’t like it. Taking a majority in population and therefore policy making is taking over a country. It’s just not the bloodbath you want to restrict your definitions to be. UK parliament literally admits that appealing to Islam and Muslim communities is becoming more important than to their own native people.

1

Anonymous #1 8w

even if we do accept your usage of the word in regards to immigration, it does not change the argument whatsoever. your advocated response is not justified, whether you classify it as an “invasion” or not. hence why you’re being criticized as a white supremacist, and are incapable of acknowledging where other organizations have been recognized as white supremacist due to the shared beliefs at play; and that goes for both you and 4.

1

Anonymous #6 8w

“Invasion” or not, it does not matter lmao, I was trying to get you to recognize that immigrants seeking a better life does not constitute a threat, to you or anyone else (aside from racial supremacists)

1

Anonymous #6 8w

It is justified https://www.mend.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Power-of-the-Muslim-vote-and-Muslim-voting-patterns.pdf

0

Anonymous #1 8w

think about it. Cultures which are in contradiction to British values have an overrepresentation of power

0

Anonymous #6 8w

I like how you always literally ignore everything that is being explained to you. I already explained that the conditions brought about justify the classification of invasion, but again you only focus on the door and not the murder.

0

Anonymous #1 8w

go ahead and cite a source for your claim on the “uk parliament” topic; and even if that’s true, do you not recognize the importance of addressing and tending to communities that have been historically and presently underrepresented in both political representatives as well as legislation? other people being treated fairly is not oppressing you; it just feels that way since you’re comfortable with the role of oppressor.

1

Anonymous #1 8w

no, it’s not. You’re just seeking to retain power within the role of oppressor. white people are not oppressed within counties that have both historically and presently codified white supremacy, the UK being one of those countries. you just dislike that status quo of white supremacy being dismantled.

1

Anonymous #1 8w

mate, you are committing the murder by closing the door. I don’t know why you keep bringing up the analogy in which you shot yourself in the foot, unless you have some type of humiliation kink or some shit.

1

Anonymous #6 8w

Again you assume my position and nothing else. Your cognitive dissonance is astounding. You say ethnic British are not oppressed, yet they lose representation in their own country, are forced to receive large populations of people whose culture are in contradiction to them and in some cases are resentful of them, and who are gaining power while the ethnic population is dramatically decreasing. Is everything so black and white to you?

0

Anonymous #1 8w

if you choose to commit an act that results in the death and/or suffering of another, despite knowing that committing the act can result in such; you are responsible.

1

Anonymous #1 8w

What you seem to think white supremacy is, is simply the ethnic British person having a sense of identity and ancestry and right to their own homeland. Is anyone who wants that for their own homeland a supremacist?

0

Anonymous #6 8w

You are ignoring everything. I already explained to you that the analogy was to the principle of seeing an action not just for it alone but for its consequences and you just ignore that to improperly use it against me. How can I reason with someone so irrational?

0

Anonymous #1 8w

I am seeing the mass immigration for what it has resulted in, as clearly an invasion. That is the nuance that you have yet to comprehend.

0

Anonymous #1 8w

you have exposed your position time and time again, need I remind you of the “race traitor” bullshit you pulled? oh, “ethnic British” now? did you stop saying white after I asked if you knew the origins of the term? A question in which I’m still waiting for an answer, I might add. did you plan on responding? need I remind you about the royal family, you inbred imbecile?

1

Anonymous #1 8w

the fact that you think anything about your belief system is nuanced is hilarious in an of itself.

1

Anonymous #6 8w

I love how you ignore all your reading comprehension and ignorant failures. I am not going to waste yours or my time answering questions that have no relevance to the actual matters of discussion. Do butterflies steal your attention on the road?

0

Anonymous #6 8w

If this is going nowhere, which it seems like it, why don’t you and I just stop talking. Go mess with #4

0

Anonymous #1 8w

did you miss the part where I said “even if we accept your use of the word”? what you fail to realize is my argument is not reliant on the definition of invasion, it’s reliant on you perpetrating document white supremacist propaganda and being too stupid to realize as such. that being said, go ahead and run like what is expected of you; especially since you continue to refuse to answer the question of where the term “white” came from in regards to racial groups.

1

Anonymous #1 8w

at the end of the day, a white supremacist is nothing more than a cowardly piece of scum throwing blame for their problems at everyone that looks different from themselves.

1

Anonymous #1 8w

it could go somewhere if you answered questions when asked.

1

Anonymous #6 8w

documented*

1

Anonymous #6 8w

You have mischaracterized me, insulted me, blamed me, misused my own analogies, moved goalposts, diverted from conversation, refused sources after you ask me to provide them assumed bad faith, assumed propaganda means wrong, and that non-scholar material means wrong. Ultimately, I have assumed good faith of you and given benefit of the doubt where you could not. Have a good day.

1