Anonymous masterdebater6769 11w

Part 1: “You have to go back to your communities and try to get your elderly relatives to understand that this connection between Israel and Zionism that is expressed over and over again through a lot of these Jewish institutions … is teaching people the idea that Jews are monolithic. And this is a dangerous — it is a very — because, look, it’s a very dangerous mode of propaganda.

1

Anonymous masterdebater6769 11w

Part 2: “And you wanna know why? Because people don’t fuck with Israel any longer. And if Jews in America keep putting this idea out there that they are singularly invested in Israel, eventually someone’s going to come around and take action. Not against the State of Israel, mind you, but against American Jews.”

1

Anonymous masterdebater6769 11w

He is directly contradicting his own words about Jews “not being a monolith” by quite literally making them a monolith. The part that matters: “if Jews in America keep putting this idea out there that they are singularly invested in Israel”

0

Anonymous masterdebater6769 11w

To be far, I hate this fuck with a burning passion and I do think he is an antisemitic fuck…but I also think it’s completely moronic that the United States Congress is having some symbolic vote of condemnation of a Twitch streamer…I think a nation has a little bigger fish to fry

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 11w

I mean poor wording if that’s direct quote but the point he is making is still correct lol he’s a streamer saying things off rip, if the point you highlighted was changed to if people in America keep putting this idea out there that Jews are singularly invested in Israel, the points still the same but optics look better

3

Anonymous masterdebater6769 11w

It’s not the same though? Changing it to “people” is a change to the agent of the claim. The agent is Jews, not “people”. That is intentional. In Hasan’s actual wording, Jews are the people producing the harmful perception about themselves. In your suggested change to “people”, other people are producing a false generalization about Jews. Those are materially different propositions.

1

Anonymous masterdebater6769 11w

I mean if you watch the full clip it’s pretty obvious what he was saying. He’s objectively correct. My question is regardless why are the Dems wasting time on this to the point of siding with the republicans & why is it Dems who receive tons of money from AIPAC & have pics with Bibi or giving him a standing ovation???

1