Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
How come nothing is being done to regulate AI
upvote 17 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 22h

The people who own AI also own the politicians

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 22h

Google the term “Lobbying”

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 22h

It seems like none of the politicians really understand the issue and can’t agree on what should actually be regulated. There was like 4 new AI regulation bills introduced though

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 12h

It’s a bit of a fools errand. Seems to be a propaganda tool to try to turn AI into the new potential bad guy. People fear what they don’t understand and they clearly don’t understand enough about it that they are trying to garner support for whatever reason. That or they do understand it’s most likely just going to kill the “bill gates” type people of the world, and this is some kind of plea to get everyone on board with saving them from their own hubris coming back to bite them.

upvote 1 downvote
🃏
Anonymous 21h

There has been. States are already passing AI laws on deepfakes, discrimination, consumer protection, government use, healthcare, etc.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 22h

i think regulation is often reactionary in the US

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 22h

i dont think you know what that word means

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 22h

And none might be a strong statement but a lot of them seem to have little understanding of

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 22h

which one? i mean that regulation often comes *after* something bad happens like as a reaction to a situation rather than preemptively

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 21h

thats not what reactionary means.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 21h

yeah reactive would’ve been better, my bad

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 21h

its kinda funny because reactionary is by definition the polar opposite of what you were trying to say

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 21h

yeah i meant reactively but coffee has yet to hit the brain so got all jumbled 😞✌️

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 21h

Okay, this conversation is on a tangent can we get back to talking about AI regulation

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> ___joker__ 21h

Not my state. Ohio isn’t doing anything to regulate AI

upvote 4 downvote
🃏
Anonymous replying to -> OP 21h

I suggest you take a closer look at your state house because you’d find out that you’re factually wrong.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 21h

i stand by the idea that regulation is often done retroactively here (look an even better word). ik the EU has the Al act and the changes are being applied globally. i think some also think the benefit outweighs the risk

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 21h

the united states operates in a specific way: release product without any safety research, then the population faces the harm and consequences. companies get money, harm is externalized, and then no justice is had. politicians are beholden to "innovation," where you do your research on your paying customers. they are paid to be this way.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 12h

Which again, it’s a fools errand… idk what they hope to accomplish by regulating it. The cat’s already out of the bag on the Epstein island stuff. People know. I don’t trust AI a ton to even do a look up unbiased, but I trust it a heck of a lot more than bill gates. It’s really funny to me they chose him as a spokesman for AI regulation.

upvote 1 downvote