Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
If one side is wrong about climate change, we worked towards a cleaner earth based on a fake threat. If the other side is wrong, we face ecological and potentially civilizational collapse
upvote 147 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 41w

Bro think of the shareholder value bro a mass extinction event is worth it bro

upvote 23 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 41w

Modern version of Pascal’s Wager.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 41w

Here's the issue one side is disregarding fact and ignoring it, the other is saying the fact, science isn't a field of being "wrong" it is the systematic way of approaching how to understand the way the world works and is factually based

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 41w

except this doesn't have the inherent flaw of there being a secret third outcome if you fight climate change like with pascal failing to consider that any religious besides his own might be the correct one in the hypothetical

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 41w

THINK OF ALL THE MONEY THAT CANT BE WITHDRAWN FROM THE STOCK MARKET AND THINK OF HOW CHEAP GAS WILL BE IN A MASS EXTINCTION

upvote 1 downvote