Anonymous #1 2w

True! I respect their ability to actually win elections and coalition build unlike leftists who get really mad when you call out that basic truth about them.

-9

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

fucking fascistic loser

24

Anonymous #1 2w

Ohhh you’re so hard for that.

-6

Anonymous #2 2w

Ineffective leftist.

-5

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

you’re such a fucking spineless loser you care more about gaining power than what people actually do with it spineless centrist immoral asshole

14

Anonymous #1 2w

YES! I do care about gaining power. THATS HOW THINGS GET DONE LOL

-5

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

figures lol, you could care less what people with power do, you only covet the power because you had some fucked up childhood which made you feel powerless or something idk

11

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Because Biden was super effective. You know who’s effective? Mamdani.

17

Anonymous #1 2w

Holy projection

-5

Anonymous #3 2w

Mamdani has been mayor for barely 3 months. It’s too soon to even say whether or not he’s effective or successful. You wanna know how he got into office though? You’re never going to guess how!

-4

Lmao damn

7

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

And in those three months he’s been more effective at his job than anyone you support.

11

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Kinda funny you chose to portray yourself as a creature in mortal danger

12

Anonymous #3 2w

AOC? Nancy Pelosi? Jon Ossoff? You sure about that?

-3

Anonymous #3 2w

I couldn’t care less what some online leftist larper thinks. They’ve been ineffective up to this point so I don’t really expect much of a change.

-6

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Yes man, Mamdani is a more effective politician than Nancy pelosi in regards to pushing for policy that benefits normal people. Also, you openly support pelosi? Jesus

15

Anonymous #3 2w

LOOOOL no shoooot you even believe that remotely. That is a wild ass statement.

-4

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Your entire ideology is represented by people who habitually get nothing done. Schumer? Jeffries? Sure they might be in office, but doing what? Not a damn thing.

14

Anonymous #3 2w

Right-wing media doing numbers on the leftist psyche. Horseshoe theory claims another victim.

-4

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Right, because liberals have been oh so effective for the last 30 years. They totally haven’t accepted the right wing framing on every single issue and aided in the rightward shift of the overton window to the point of playing directly into the fascists’ hands. Liberals have held more power than leftists, sure, but what good is that when they refuse to wield it against the Right?

22

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

bro said “Nancy Pelosi” like it’s 1978 lmfao

13

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

In what ways has your life been bettered by Nancy pelosi? Because it better be a fucking lot to make up for her decades long push against universal heathcare, her incompetence on climate legislation, and her opposition to workers rights.

10

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 2w

Yeah seriously they’re stuck in the past

14

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 2w

That question can literally be turned back on you and would blame the system in place. For a group that has such righteous morals and effective policy, you sure have done fuck all to actually get into positions of power to forward those morals and policy.

-3

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

“It’s your fault that the people I support are evil, because you haven’t replaced them yet”

7

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Well stop fucking supporting them then

6

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 2w

Pelosi has been the most effective Dem in our lifetime LOL. Brain rot Tiktokers being tikking!

-5

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

I love how all you ever do is attack leftists, and then as soon as you’re asked to defend your precious geriatric liberals, you just immediately refuse to do anything of the sort lmao you’re just as spineless as Nancy, no wonder you like her so much.

12

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Yep. Most effective in our lifetime. And look at all we have to show for it. Americas really doing great.

13

Anonymous #3 2w

Bro you’re the populist LOL you have the popular support of the people, right? What good would I be against such popular demand for leftist candidates?

-3

Anonymous #3 2w

😱 It’s almost as if there is another opposition party called the Republicans who also govern sometimes.

-3

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

You personally? Nothing. You’re nobody. But the broader establishment designed to prevent progressive populism? That same urge that makes you like fascists over progressives? That shit is a rot in this country.

5

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 2w

This thread literally started because I went at a conservative by the way. So good job with that character analysis.

-2

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

But people like mamdani and talarico prove that the rot can be tamed with enough public effort. So hey, here’s hoping.

13

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Imagine having all of the US’s intelligence agencies, and the DOJ in your hands for 4 whole years and then refusing to lock up your criminal opposition because “muh civility” lmao

5

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Yeah I saw I just don’t really care. Yeah, conservatives are evil. But like, so are you. What you want good boy points for pointing out there’s other shitty people?

11

Anonymous #3 2w

Talarico has to win the general AND he has to govern. I don’t get how you guys rejoice when “your candidates” who run under the DEMOCRATIC PARTY win and haven’t even had enough time to actually do anything. It’s completely unfair for ANYONE to judge Mamdani this early. He needs a year minimum and 2 years max for long term policy promises.

-2

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Talarico isn’t even a leftist tho, he’s like dead-center at best

6

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 2w

So you do accept that this thread started because I went at a conservative?

-3

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

I understand talarico hasn’t won yet champ, I’m just saying the fact he beat Crockett proves progressive outsider candidates can beat DNC (and RNC) backed shills.

12

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

You’re so desperate to miss the forest for the trees. You’d do anything to look past the reality sitting right in front of you.

6

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

I actually didn’t go through your string of six quote posts that exist because you’re only capable of leaving comments on your own shit, apparently

5

Anonymous #3 2w

“Progressive outsider” you mean the guy running on everything leftists hated Harris for aka trying to play to moderates?

-2

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

the Dems are closer to the republicans than most leftists are to the Dems The Dems are a center-right party

11

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

it’s just right-wing infighting

7

Anonymous #1 2w

Okay, that’s fine. We’re center-right. Now fuck off and go start your own leftist party lol.

-2

Anonymous #1 2w

Ehhhhhh hes definitely a sleeper leftie. When asked one thing he loved other than his family he replied “trans children”. Kamala and newsom would never do that. Maybe in 2016 but not ever now.

10

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 2w

So you didn’t know this started from me attack a conservative then? Is that what you’re admitting?

-3

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

You already know that if a leftist party started getting votes you’d immediately be pissing and moaning about then being “spoilers for the GOP” lmao we know how this goes

5

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

It doesn’t really matter.

8

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

It’s always “we don’t need your votes anyways” until you lose, and then suddenly it’s “why would the left do this”

11

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 2w

No, I’d be fine with it.

-3

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Like I know you want it to matter that you’re anti Trump but that’s such a low fucking bar.

13

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Except when people like Mamdani show up, you’re not fine with it. Why lie?

14

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Play to moderates by openly being progressive? Yeah. That’s fine.

11

Anonymous #3 2w

It does matter. You guys loooooove when I go at conservatives hard as fuck, but as soon as I turn on leftists who don’t do anything other than criticize Dems while also screaming how they’re not going to vote, you guys start getting assmad. Just like the Dems, you’re not immune to criticism ☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️

-2

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Right. Because one of those groups is evil and the other isn’t. Also I don’t really care when you “go hard against conservatives.” You don’t actually believe the right shit, so you don’t actually have a lot to say. You just coincidentally have a correct target.

15

Anonymous #3 2w

I have nothing to say about Mamdani because he hasn’t had enough time to govern LOL. No one is lying here.

-2

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

If anything, you’re the least qualified person to criticize conservatives.

13

Anonymous #3 2w

Ahhhh…one group is evil! Why didn’t just realize that!

-1

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

I don’t know but you should get too it.

7

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

*to

8

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Bro I remember what you were posting about mamdani a few months ago, there’s a reason you hide your posts on your profile. You *are* lying. Absolutely.

6

Anonymous cheese_of_the_world_unite 2w

And it’s always “Leftists don’t have enough power to sway elections!” but also “You need to cater to leftist ideologies!” Your comments make no sense.

-1

Anonymous #3 2w

I hide my posts because I’m not moron who needs people going through my shit so they can brigade the report system to have the automod mute me.

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Who’s saying we can’t sway elections?

9

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

We absolutely can.

6

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

We do locally like all the time.

8

Anonymous #3 2w

If you can sway elections, then why would anyone refute liberals being mad at leftists for saying that? 🤣

-1

Anonymous #3 2w

You can’t be powerless and powerful at the same time. Pick one and run with it.

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Fuckin what?

5

Anonymous #3 2w

READ WITH YOUR FUCKING EYES BRO

-1

Anonymous #3 2w

Did Harris lose because of leftists or not? Did Clinton lose because of leftists or not?

-1

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Crash out time for joker

10

Anonymous #3 2w

👍

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Clinton no, Harris yes in a way. She lost because of her stances on Gaza, it seems based on that leak. So yeah probably.

7

Anonymous #3 2w

There was no leak 🤦‍♂️ The Axios article is just hearsay.

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Actually, maybe Clinton yes? I was very young. But the way they did Bernie might’ve been a turn off for a lot of people

3

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

Pfft okay bud

5

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

“Ignore the mountains of evidence that points to the contrary, actually democrat voters love Israel” Okay joker. Name makes sense.

1

Anonymous #3 2w

Damn, you’re hitting all the points today. They rat fucked Bernie!!!

1

Anonymous #3 2w

Who said anything about Dems loving Israel????? LOL bro you’re so binary

1

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

I just said that there was a leak suggesting that Kamala Harris lost because of her stance on Gaza. You disagree. That implied Kamala’s stance on the conflict does not bother most Democrat voters. Her stance is pro Israel, so that would make their voters…? What would that make them? You got this bud

1

Anonymous #1 2w

By the way, in case you got muted for that cute little comment you made, I didn’t report you. Welcome to why I keep my history off.

-1

Anonymous #3 2w

The “leak” was made by the IMEU, a group that supports Palestinian rights and aid. Forget party alignment or whoever you support. Matter of fact, if you can’t, we can play a hypothetical. If a group called the Project for Israel came out and said that Democrats met with them and they told Axios that the Dems lost because they didn’t support Israel hard enough, would you believe that?

0

Anonymous #3 2w

The claim made by the IMEU states that Dems LOST THE ELECTION because of Gaza. As of right now, there’s no autopsy that’s been released to state that fact, just the IMEU saying they MET with Dems and they said that. No evidence, just hearsay from a group with an ideological bias. I’m hesitant to believe ANYTHING like that and the fact that you aren’t says more about you than me.

1

Anonymous #3 2w

My opinion, which is just from what I’ve seen and heard, is that Gaza, didn’t mean fuck all to the American people. What mattered to them was the economy and immigration. You somehow can’t separate ideological views and political analysis for whatever reason. I could be wrong on Gaza, but again, I’ve seen ZERO FUCKING EVIDENCE to suggest that Dems lost because of it.

0

Anonymous #3 2w

Still there, champ?!? I hope I didn’t lose you with all that nuance I just gave you!

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

yes

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

bro is downplaying the news bc it doesn’t align with his worldview why would the IMEU leak a statement, burn bridges, all over a lie?

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

also IMEU never said that Gaza policy cost Kamala the election, they said it was a net negative to Kamala’s campaign

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

so strawman, false equivalence, and what else lol?

0

Anonymous #1 2w

The DNC literally denied, like I knew they would! LOL It’s literally a “he said she said” at this point.

0

Anonymous #1 2w

That is NOT what was being claimed when that story first broke even remotely. Anyone with a fucking brain could tell you that not support Gaza was a net negative FOR YOUNG PEOPLE WHO DONT FUUUUCKING VOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOTE

0

Anonymous #1 2w

The largest swathe of voters who wanted support for Gaza was in Michigan and specifically in Dearborn! WOW! I wonder what chunk of voter demographic that could be!

0

Anonymous #1 2w

And it’s not about burning bridges, it’s about trying to orientate the political conversation in their favor. They benefit from Democrats, who are weak right now, facing the fire in hopes that they can get the Democrats to switch their position. There’s nothing wrong with that and no one here said there is.

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

tbf democrats are less popular than even republicans atp by the polls, i think clinging to what the Dems stand for now is a losing strategy when they have close to a -25 approval rating

1

Anonymous #1 2w

Crazy how that has NOTHING to do with the conversation.

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

You…actually think Pelosi has been effective at doing literally anything?

1

Anonymous xi.jinping 2w

You…are a tankie?

0

Anonymous ___joker__ 2w

That’s not an answer to my question

1

Anonymous xi.jinping 2w

I don’t need to answer your question. You’re ideologically poised against anything I say so it doesn’t matter lol.

0