Anonymous #1 3w

100% illegal and unlawful orders. There needs to be clear and decisive reasoning under ROE.

12

Do you not understand rules of engagement?

8

No. That is not how it works. Maybe learn about wars before you try to argue and make yourself look even more silly. Have the day you deserve.

11

ok bro go sign up for the military to shoot fishermen with millions of dollars in missiles

2

I feel like I shouldn’t have to explain how any and all Iranians don’t count as enemy combatants. You can’t just shoot whoever you want aimlessly on sight. That’s literally a war crime. You have to identify that they’re an enemy combatant that’s trying to attack you first. Jesus fucking Christ.

3

Anonymous #4 3w

What if the enemy uses civilian vessels for a military purpose? Under the “laws” of war you mentioned any vessel suspected of being used for a military purpose is by definition a military vessel and can be treated as such. Same thing with hospitals, if you use them to store weapons or as a base of operations it loses all protection under the laws of war. That’s part of the reason why civilian casualties were so high in Gaza. So many people don’t understand the Geneva conventions and

-1

Anonymous #1 3w

Even more have never read them

0

Anonymous #1 3w

For someone who thinks they know Geneva conventions, they sure don’t know rules of engagement.

0

Anonymous #1 3w

Bro you can’t just say ‘Well I think that boat is a military ship so I’ll blow it up without confirming what kind of boat it is or whose on it’. Are you fucking nuts?

1

Anonymous nsa.org 3w

Define the term rules of engagement

1